I've found that Eloquence/IBM TTS is
most accurate in pronouncing times and currency out of the box
without any weird geeky "regular expressions" which I've not yet
ben able to master.
Roger
On 1/30/2023 2:12 PM, Gene wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I haven't used the newer kind of synthesizers to any extent but
Eloquence, compared with the small amount I've used some newer
synthesizers, pronounces the most words correctly without
correction. I used Dectalk a lot before Eloquence and Eloquence
is more accurate out of the box. For whatever reason, that is my
experience.
Gene
On 1/30/2023 1:49 PM, Travis Siegel
wrote:
Oh, and I wanted to comment on the dictionary corrections of
voices. I think you'd be surprised if you checked the
dictionary entries, and/or the voice source. I think you'll
find there's way more word corrections than you'd otherwise
think, regardless of the synth you're using.
Often times, there's built-in dictionaries that aren't
accessible to the end user that change pronunciations without
the end user even being aware those entries exist. English is
a complicated language, so this isn't really a surprise. Add
to that, the existence of several different dialects, and you
run into the case where the developer of a particular synth
thinks a word should be pronounced one way, and a user from
another part of the country hears that as the wrong
pronunciation, so that complicates things too.
Never mind accents from different parts of the world.
On 1/30/2023 12:47 PM, Gene wrote:
If
you tell me how to get and use Reed, I may try it, but I
simply don't believe you can make E-Speak sound enough like
NVDA and perform enough like it at fast speech rates to be
anywhere near satisfactory to someone who wants NVDA.
When I set the speech rate to 56, which is slower than I
listen with Eloquence but is getting to be reasonably fast,
speech is annoyingly choppy and much harder to understand than
Eloquence, even when Eloquence is set to read at much faster
rates.
I haven't tested this, but I would be very surprised if
E-Speak pronounces nearly as many words correctly, without
dictionary correction, as Eloquence.
Unless you have significantly redesigned E-speak, I am very
skeptical of your claim. How can we try Reed and/or send a
recording of E-speak reading at the speed of 56 and perhaps a
sample of it speaking somewhat faster.
You may have persuaded one listener, but one listener isn't at
all representative of how others may react.
Gene
On 1/30/2023 11:28 AM, Gene via
groups.io wrote:
I haven't given
any thought to what you are suggesting and I don't have an
opinion. But I have never, and you have often said things
like, this synthesizer, or these changes, sound like
Eloquence, found any statements from anyone of the sort to
be true.
Gene
On 1/30/2023 9:38 AM, Josh
Kennedy wrote:
hi,
Last night I did something I thought impossible. A friend
of mine is, and was, a user of eloquence tts for many
years. Then I showed him the changes I made to espeak,
asking him what tts I was using. He had to pause for a
second before answering, espeak. I then asked him if he
liked the much improved espeak. He sai that he did. After
I helped him set the variant to Reed, set inflection to
30, lower the pitch by a small amount, he was quite happy
with espeak. He also complained that the reason he still
uses Jaws is because jaws has a bunch of features NVDA
does not have. I told him you can find most of those
features in NVDA addons. He complained that Jaws is nice
because it gives you everything in one package already
there. so therefore my suggestions are these.
1. Instead of the addons manager putting you onto a
website and you have to go find the addons, please make it
more like how window-eyes did things. Add a web scraper to
the addons manager that will go out to both:
https://addons.nvda-project.org/index.en.html
and also:
https://nvda-addons.org/
and
https://github.com/BabbageCom/objEnhancer
scrape those sites for all addons, their descriptions and
download links. Put them in a list view with checkboxes.
have their descriptions in a read only edit box and an
install button and uninstall buttons beside the edit box.
This will make it easier for new users to find and install
the addons they want, even installing multiple addons if
they choose. You could even filter addons by type of
addon, if its a voice addon like vocalizer or an addon
that just adds new features you want? If its vocalizer it
will let you download the addon but its still up to you to
purchase it.
2. Offer two NVDA download options, NVDA basic, and NVDA
advanced or NVDA full packages. NVDA advanced or full
would be much larger than the basic NVDA because it would
contain all compatible NVDA addons. And NVDA basic would
be the small traditional NVDA, the one with no addons by
default. The one we currently download. NVDA full would be
great for new NVDA users because it would just have
everything they need or would want in the future all
addons preinstalled. They could hit a keystroke for
helpful hints and just use the features they want as they
become familiar with them. NVDA full would be great for
assistive technology trainers and employers because
everything they would ever want and need is right there
all addons preinstalled. Want to relabel an object in your
work application? The object enhancer addon is already
there.
|