locked Re: test please read
|
Gene
The original message specifically said that he was
not receiving list mail. If that statement is accurate, then no amount of
replies on list would reach him. If someone wants to tell the person that
his message reached the list, replying off list would be the logical thing to
do.
I'm simply pointing out that when someone
specifically says that they are not receiving list mail, the logical way to
respond is to reply off list tlo the person.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Le Baudour
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 6:47 AM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] test please read I would guess he wants to be pretty sure at least a message has been sent, and he might not be sure with his own mail as some mailing lists don't send back your own messages. I'd assume it'd be best to check the archives to see what was sent and when, but he might not know avout thet, have difficulties with the website, not thought of it, etc. -- Patrick. Le 21/03/2016 12:09, Gene a écrit : > I see that I was wrong in one point. The original message said any > response would be welcome to see if the ISP is blocking messages. But > again, if the person is not getting list mail, what sense does it make > to respond on list? > Gene
|
|
|