Re: Accessible Application Updater
Maybe you ddidn't receive my first message.
----- Original Message -----
hi Gene, sorry I should not have responded to this on list this is a
good egsample of not reading all mail first. but as said this has been
resolved. but I did not see any mail to date saying to stop speaking
On 14/03/2017 00:54, Gene wrote:
> I have no objection tothe original discussion continuing.
> When such personal disputes come up, will list members please make a
> point of reading all their male before responding? And it would be a
> good idea to wait a while to see if the thread is resolved before
> commenting. In this case the dispute had been resolved before another
> message was sent by a list member not originally in the dispute. It is
> nnot appropriate for small disputes like this to become topics for
> general discussion.
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Christopher-Mark Gilland <mailto:clgilland07@...>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 13, 2017 7:34 PM
> *To:* email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Accessible Application Updater
> Is it ok if we continue the thread as long as it is related to
> specifically the updater software, and not regarding the comments that
> were made, or would you rather it be closed period altogether.
> Please clarify. Either way, I'm ok with your decision.