Re: Why is installing an addon on firefox such a nightmare!
There is a signed version of Webvisum that will work with the current version of Firefox. I don't have the address for downloading it but it went through the signing procedure by James Scholes, (spelling) and he is a trusted person. So the file is safe to use and has not been laced with malware. You can read about it on the blind bargains site. And information about the download link and how to install it is given there as well.
----- Original Message -----
because its not a approved firefox extension firefox by default blocks
such extensions from other websites
you can get around this by editing your about;config settings
and disableing strict compatibility
but i didnt tell you that if it all goes to hell in a hand cart
On 16/04/2016 11:50, Robert Mendoza wrote:
> If you are using newer version of a Firefox it will not allow to
> install the said addons. From the time Firefox update to 43 and newer
> that there is some security features being added into it. I would
> suggest to use an old version to get it and successful installation
> from your end. But, there is an option in order to accept it but its
> is quite not secure and it will void the security if you made some
> modification in the setup of firefox. I believe somewhere here also,
> mentioned here the steps for it.
> Robert Mendoza
> On 4/16/2016 6:40 PM, Ali Colak wrote:
>> Added to my previous message, I've encountered this problem
>> previously and it isn't something rescent. Previously I just asked
>> someone sited to click the button for me.
>> On 4/16/16, Ali Colak <alish54@...> wrote:
>>> Or am I doing something wrong.
>>> Hello to all. Last night I tried to reinstall webvisum, as I have
>>> just baught a new computer. When ever I press the install link, the
>>> notifaction to allow firefox to install the addon comes. I've tried
>>> pressing alt+a several times, and I've tried pressing the space bar or
>>> enter when it seems that I'm on the allow button, nothing works.
>>> I don't remember seeing any other complaints about this from anyone,
>>> so is it only me getting something so basic wrong?
>>> Any suggestions?