Re:
Gene
I am not aware of any settings governing the
behavior you are describing. I tried listening to your example using
ESpeak and I did not get the results you describe.
Gene ----- Original Message -----
It has nothing to do with the Synthesiser. I have used both SAPI (the version as default on Windows 10) and ESpeak. Both these synthesisers give me the same problem. Isn't there a autocomplete option or something that I need to uncheck somewhere? Thanks Heaven On 4/19/16, Gene <gsasner@...> wrote: > What synthesizer are you using? This appears to be an issue of how your > synthesizer works and not NVDA. > > Gene > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: HBotma > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 2:17 AM > To: nvda@groups.io > Subject: Re: [nvda] > > > Hello > > Talking about pronounciations. NVDA has a way of reading words as > months. For instance, if I read a word that starts with the letters > JUN with a number preceeding or succeeding it, NVDA reads it as June. > This is rather annoying and I would actually like to know how to > change it. > > If I can give you an example NVDA reads 2 Mark as 2 March k. > > On 4/19/16, Christo Vorster <christo.vorster@...> wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> >> My first experience with computers was back in 1986. A friend of mine had >> an >> Apple with SoftVert as speech programme. I still am of the opinion that >> SoftVert was way ahead of it’s time. >> >> >> >> Then I moved into a new job at the Pioneer School for the Blind in >> Worcester, South Africa. >> >> >> >> Just for interest sake. I was appointed as Piano Tuning teacher. What I >> wil >> remember for the rest of my life is that I got a desktop computer. A 186 >> (the rest of the letters and numbers I cannot remember), 20 MB hard drive >> and something like 4 MB of RAM. I can’t even remember the version of DOS >> I >> used, probably something like 3.1, or something. At that time I thought >> that >> 20 MB of hard drive space was so much that it would last me for the rest >> of >> my life. Those were the “good old days”. Now 2 TerraByte is pushing it >> for >> space. >> >> >> >> Yes! We must live with change. Fortunately one can change, but we my >> still >> remember the starting days. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> From: David Moore [mailto:jesusloves1966@...] >> Sent: Monday, 18 April 2016 9:32 PM >> To: nvda@groups.io >> Subject: Re: [nvda] >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I used the dec talk hard ware synthisizer in the 80s with an IBM >> computer. >> Wow, that really brings back memories. Take care. >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Arianna Sepulveda <mailto:englishrider91@...> >> >> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:34 PM >> >> To: nvda@groups.io >> >> Subject: Re: [nvda] >> >> >> >> Thanks for those samples. I've never really been a fan of Decktalk, but I >> have heard quite a bit of it over the years, and you are right. This >> version >> does sound quite different than what's shipped with Window Eyes. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ari >> >> >> >> People who are interested may want to hear a recording I made when I was >> evaluating this version of Dectalk. it speaks differently enough and has >> a >> bit of a different inflection pattern as well and those interested should >> hear the program when deciding. You may be able to use it as a demo but >> this recording may allow you to decide what you think of this version. >> The >> original DECTalk couldn't be replicated, I think because the code was >> lost >> at some time and this is a reconstruction. The person selling the >> program >> isn't responsible for this. She is making available what has been >> supplied. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The person selling this version is very friendly and it was a pleasure >> corresponding with her. >> >> The link to download the samples is >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25812011/DECtalk%20samples.mp3?dl=1 >> >> The sample consists of the reading of a small part of Genesis at two >> different speeds. Trying the synthesizer as you would use it may be >> preferable but this may give you a reasonable idea of whether you want to >> pursue the matter. >> >> >> >> Gene >> >> >> >> From: Shaun Everiss <mailto:sm.everiss@...> >> >> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 6:04 AM >> >> To: nvda@groups.io >> >> Subject: Re: This is the moderator speaking: [nvda] Question Regarding >> Eloquence for NVDA from Code Factory >> >> >> >> Well if people don't want the legal version of eloquence. >> emailing enablerehab@... and asking for their dectalk synth may be >> the better option. >> They don't exactly sell it anymore because there is no interest however >> they will sell it to you for basically what its worth. >> Their licence with fonix means you need to pay but there is no fixed >> price so pay what you want. >> I put in 20 bucks for the thing but you could pay anything from 1-2 >> dollars up. >> For those not liking eloquence this may be the better solution. >> My only complaint is that some of the voices are a bit quiet volume >> wise. >> However for about a couple mb you get every dectalk voice and language, >> sadly no singing but even so. >> >> >> >> On 18/04/2016 10:33 p.m., Joseph Lee wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> 1. CF version is legal. >>> 2. Sometimes we do see illegal Eloquence pop up, and this version is the >>> one we don't allow (legal versions are allowed). >>> Hope this helps (and please have a long rest). >>> Cheers, >>> Joseph >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christopher-Mark Gilland [mailto:clgilland07@...] >>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 3:25 AM >>> To: nvda@groups.io >>> Subject: Re: This is the moderator speaking: [nvda] Question Regarding >>> Eloquence for NVDA from Code Factory >>> >>> This is the only Eloquence related post I'm going to send to this list, >>> but it has 100% everything to do with what Joseph has just said. I'm >>> neither promoting nor asking about how to get this working with >>> Eloquence, >>> so know that up front. >>> >>> So, my question is, first, Joseph, you say that Code Factory released an >>> addon. I guess my question is, is that addon considered to be illegal? >>> Second off, I'm a little bit confused. Are you saying that Eloquence is >>> allowed, or are you saying it isn't allowed at this time on list. >>> Further, if not allowed, please then be more specific. Are you saying >>> it's not allowed period, or are you saying it's allowed, but only if >>> talking about the CF version. >>> >>> Sorry, your message was just a little bit vague. I've had an extremely >>> emotionally rough night, I won't go into it more than to say, I've been >>> crying my eyes out all night, so therefore as you can imagine, I'm >>> incredibly tired, so perhaps my mind is a bit oblivious right now to the >>> meaning of your message. If so, please forgive me. >>> --- >>> Christopher Gilland >>> JAWS Certified, 2016. >>> Training Instructor. >>> >>> clgilland07@... >>> Phone: (704) 256-8010. >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Joseph Lee" <joseph.lee22590@...> >>> To: <nvda@groups.io> >>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 6:17 AM >>> Subject: Re: This is the moderator speaking: [nvda] Question Regarding >>> Eloquence for NVDA from Code Factory >>> >>> >>> Ladies and gentlemen, >>> >>> Until a few months ago, discussion of Eloquence wasn't allowed on this >>> list. >>> This was relaxed last summer when Code Factory released Eloquence >>> add-on. >>> Back then, Nimer and I (Nimer being the actual list owner) said >>> discussion >>> of illegal version isn't still permitted. >>> At this point, it would be advisable to suspend Eloquence discussions >>> for >>> a while. We cannot risk giving NVDA a slightly muddy reputation at this >>> important occasion: NVDA's tenth anniversary and NVDACon. Please don't >>> forget this: the reputation of a product, particularly a product that >>> many >>> of you depends on, depends on what users say about the product and the >>> discussions surrounding it. >>> For those new to this list: I'm known for being generous. However, I'm >>> also known for being a volcano, especially if the integrity of the list >>> or >>> the reputation of a product or a community is questioned. I'll not >>> activate moderation flag for anyone out of respect for everyone and for >>> newbies to get accustomed to this environment. >>> For our old friends: Yes, I am indeed serious, more serious now that >>> we're >>> about to help NV Access celebrate NVDA's tenth birthday. Not only I'm >>> speaking on behalf of moderators, but as one of the planners of NVDACon >>> 2016 (I am indeed the chair of the planning committee), I'd like to >>> kindly >>> request that we care about reputation of NVDA, NV Access and this >>> community. >>> These days, what gives me more stress isn't the question of who will >>> succeed me or success of NVDACon, but the reputation and future of this >>> community for months and years to come. What gives me more joy is to see >>> you all become folks who can think about what's going on and make >>> informed >>> decisions (yes, that's the reason why I've proposed certain proposals in >>> the past). >>> In conclusion, I do know I will not be able to sleep tonight, but >>> believe >>> I need to say this: NVDA community, specifically this forum, is facing a >>> crisis: misinformation abounds and passion trumps reason at times. We're >>> suffering from a disease called "misinformation" - what is illegal being >>> seen as legal, people not being informed as to what's available to them >>> when they need it, name calling at times and so forth (as I mentioned in >>> my blog, I will not accept name calling). Being passionate about >>> something >>> is good, but it is better to think about what's going on before >>> defending >>> one's arguments. In other words, contrary to what we've said about this >>> forum to the outside world, we're at times known for doing the opposite. >>> Lastly, in regards to free material: there is no such thing as free >>> lunch. >>> I do need to say this in public: NVDA isn't technically free. For the >>> benefit of many, NVDA is made available as a free, open-source and >>> community-driven screen reader. But there are costs associated with this >>> project. Please stop now and imagine for a second: imagine a group of >>> developers who have decided to promote equal access to technology at no >>> additional costs, using their talents to give opportunities for someone >>> who lives in poverty somewhere. >>> NVDA is more than a screen reader now: it's a movement, and workers >>> deserve their wages - support, encouragement, opportunities and so on. >>> Thank you. >>> Cheers, >>> Joseph >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Afrim [mailto:afrim.maja@...] >>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:43 AM >>> To: nvda@groups.io >>> Subject: Re: [nvda] Question Regarding Eloquence for NVDA from Code >>> Factory >>> >>> Why do people talk about it? They can, and I don't consider it against >>> the >>> rules of the list since the add-on, the alternative if you like to call >>> it >>> is available and accessible from within the add-on list of NVDA. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 9:33 PM, mk360 <mk.seventhson@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I can pay, but the first condition is that the paid versions works as >>>> fine or better that the alternative, and as reviews as been said, that >>>> is not the case. >>>> However, I know that in the list we can't speak about that >>>> alternative, so I don't understand why the people speak about it. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> mk. >>>> >>>>> El 17-04-2016 a las 8:04, Greg Wocher escribió: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I want to give those of you who use the illegal eloquence add on some >>>>> food for thought. When you do it and proudly proclaim that you do, >>>>> you give NVDA and its users a bad reputation. I think I may purchase >>>>> the Code Factory add on later this afternoon from AT Guys and I will >>>>> let you all know if it gets rid of the choppiness. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Greg Wocher >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/17/2016 5:32 AM, Peter Beasley wrote: >>>>>> My sentiments exactly. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Afrim >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 6:40 AM >>>>>> To: nvda@groups.io >>>>>> Subject: Re: [nvda] Question Regarding Eloquence for NVDA from Code >>>>>> Factory >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been using the old add-on of eloquonce someone made, and I am >>>>>> not going to pay for a program that does essentially the same >>>>>> thing. The add-on I am talking about works so fast and reliably. >>>>>> cheers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 6:22 AM, Kelly Sapergia <ksapergia@...> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Recently, there was a discussion about alternative voices for NVDA, >>>>>>> such as Code Factory's add-on with Eloquence and Vocalizer. I >>>>>>> mentioned that when I tried this particular product, I noticed that >>>>>>> Eloquence sounded quite choppy compared to other screen readers and >>>>>>> other synths I have for NVDA on my machine running Windows 7. >>>>>>> I also never experienced this with Code Factory's SAPI 5 >>>>>>> implementation. >>>>>>> Anyway, I got thinking about it this evening, and decided to do >>>>>>> some searching to see if anyone else was experiencing similar >>>>>>> issues. I found a thread about the add-on in the old NVDA list's >>>>>>> archive, and saw a message stating that the choppiness would go >>>>>>> away once the product was paid for. I was just wondering if this is >>>>>>> indeed the case? If yes, it's not what I'd consider the best way to >>>>>>> limit a trial version, but I might buy it after all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yours Sincerely, >>>>>>> Kelly John Sapergia >>>>>>> Show Host and Production Director >>>>>>> The Global Voice Internet Radio >>>>>>> http://www.theglobalvoice.info >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Personal Website: http://www.ksapergia.net Business Website (KJS >>>>>>> Productions): http://www.kjsproductions.com Follow me on Twitter >>>>>>> at: kjsapergia >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> . >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > |
|