Locked Re: why does seem that so many blind people are so against change?


No one can see change coming, though sometimes when it comes its like you are crashing into a brick wall at 100 miles an hour.
Sometimes its good, often not.

On 20/04/2016 6:09 a.m., Ron Canazzi wrote:

On 4/19/2016 3:10 AM, Isaac wrote:
there against change because they can't see it coming!
----- Original Message -----
From: Christo Vorster
To: nvda@groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 1:58 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] why does seem that so many blind people are so
against change?


I use OutLook, Win 10 and office 2010, on my work computer. To me
OutLook is perfect, but that is the program I learnt everything
concerning email on.

I always say that making choices regarding computer programs is
much like buying a car. The only question is “what do you prefer,
like, or what works for you”.


From: n8mnx@... [mailto:n8mnx@...]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 April 2016 4:14 AM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] why does seem that so many blind people are so
against change?

I think that maybe blind people are not against change for the
sake of change but it's the fear that their old favorite programs
won't work and how accessable will the new os be or how accessable
will the new programs be. I to did like windows xp with outlook
express and when I was concitering upgrading to windows 7 I was
hesitent because I did not know what email program would work and be
accessable. I did of course upgrade and used windows live mail and
when I began to have issues with it I went to thunderbird and I now
have windows 10 and I still use thunderbird. I think that the reason
that we all like outlook express isthat it is just a simple email
program with nobells and whistles like calendars or features that we
don't need or can't use. Outlook express will always be the best
email program but we have adapted to other programs but that does not
mean that we are happy with them we just adjust. We all don't like
change but we can and do adapt but we don't like it. With new
versions of windows there may be features that we don't need or want
or we can't use but we use what we want to use or what we can use. I
know that every one has their screen reader of choice and they think
that theirs is the best I use nvdathen there is the issue of winamp
it's no longer supported but I still have not been convinced that
there is a better program so I will just keep using it. We should
upgrade if we need to but we chould not have change fordced upon us
this should be our choice. Think of the Omish people they don't have
cars they still use horse and buggies that is their choice and so is
somones choice if they still use windows xp if they are willing to
take the risk thats their choice and not ours.
Brian Sackrider

On 4/18/2016 9:48 PM, Pauline Smith wrote:

Change is hard, but we must adjust. I wasn't fond of Win 7 when
I got this computer, but I have adjusted. When a colleague told me
how to find and put terms into the search bar by hitting the Start
button, much frustration has been saved. Now, I'm comtemplating doing
the upgrade to Win 10. I just wanted to make sure I knew what I was
getting into before doing it.


On 4/18/2016 6:27 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:

Rosemarie Chavarria wrote, in regard to a friend of hers who
insisted on staying with WinXP, "I asked him why and his answer was
that it was simpler to work with."

And I can't count the times I've heard this, about way more
than Windows, and thought, "No, it's not easier to work with - it's
what you're used to." Win XP was an OS I loved and Microsoft has the
annoying habit of alternating "good" and "bad" versions of Windows.
The number of things that require manual intervention from the user in
XP is huge compared to later versions, particularly Windows 7
forward. And, when it comes down to it, even in the "ugly" versions
of Windows the similarities to their predecessors is at least as
strong as the differences, but the differences are where people are
required to learn something new.

David Moore's comments regarding those who live to be 100, or
near it, really resonate with me. My grandmother died in the 1990s
and was in her 90s at the time. When I think about what technology was
at her birth and the amount of change she and her age cohort had to go
through I am amazed. I don't know if I could be as flexible as they
were. While the pace of change has picked up, particularly in the
cyber world, the majority of changes I've lived through (I'm just
short of 54 years old) feel to me much more like refinements on very
familiar themes rather than complete divergences from what came
before. That was not true for my grandparents at all, and my parents
experienced more revolutionary changes than I have, too. I think my
only two revolutions were the introduction of the personal computer
and the ascendance of the internet.


Join {nvda@nvda.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.