Re: A question for users of multiple screenreaders.
I'm sorry but to be blunt, and I'm not serving anyone well if I'm not in a case like this, your message is misleading and inaccurate.
I've seen many instances where one screen-reader works better with something than another. I'm speaking from years of experience.
In addition, your correlation, or I should say, alleged correlation, between views on why screen-readers are expensive if they are powerful and for profit and advocating using more than one screen-reader is irrelevant and I see no reason that there should be such a correlation. The reasons screen-readers are expensive or views on that subject are completely unrelated to the imperial and demonstrable from experience, question of whether there are instances where one screen-reader works better than another on a certain web page or in a certain program.
----- Original Message -----
Multiple screen readers are not particularly useful, unless possibly you
are a access technology trainer or assessor or someone who works in the
industry. I guess one possible use case might be, your primary screen
reader crashes. Then you need sound so you can figure out why the screen
reader crashed, so you pull up your secondary screen reader and find out. I
think it's interesting that the people who subscribe to the multiple screen
readers are better idea also subscribe to the business of vote the market
for screen readers and access Technologies being too small to keep the
price point down. Mastering multiple screen readers is outside the scope of
time effort and expense that most people are willing to put in. even
considering the diverse feature sets strengths and weaknesses of the
various window screen access products, I think most people would be best
served by picking one and learning it well.
On October 7, 2017 3:56:01 PM "John Isige" <gwynn@...> wrote:
Hi all. Over the years I've heard several of you say that multiple
screen readers are a good thing, so much so that some have advocated
keeping demo copies installed, just in case. So I have a question. Can
you give specific cases where this is useful?
I ask this because I started using NVDA full time because I decided to
try it for a month. During that time, I ran into one or two things where
NVDA didn't read text, I think installers and the like but I can't
remember exactly, since it was like three or four years ago. I'd fire up
JFW, and it would produce the exact same results. That demonstrated, to
me at least, that I didn't get any real advantages out of running jaws.
Now don't misunderstand me. I'm not trying to start a fight here. I'm
not saying that jaws is bad or anything. I'm just saying that when I ran
into potential issues with NVDA, jaws didn't solve those issues either.
Since NVDA was doing everything else I wanted, I concluded that
switching wouldn't cause me to lose any access. So I'm curious to know
what things you might gain access to with jaws or another screen reader
that you can't get with NVDA. I suppose the obvious example would be
anything with jaws scripts, I don't know if things like Dolphin have
scripts or not. But I mean, I've just heard people advocate this, like
I've said, you know have a demo copy installed and stuff like that. So
I'd just like to hear of any specific cases where another screenreader
has helped. I think it would be really useful to know that kind of thing.