Re: espeak
Antony Stone
If anyone can suggest an open source synthesiser which is better than espeak,
and which NVDA could include, then please suggest it.
Complaints such as "X is crap" without any proposal for what would be a better
alternative, are rather useless.
Do people here really expect Mick and Jamie, plus the other developers of
NVDA, to create a speech synthesiser as well as a screenreader?
By all means offer better alternatives to what is available, but otherwise
please remember that this is free software, and if you don't like what it can
do, there are more expensive alternatives.
Antony.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
and which NVDA could include, then please suggest it.
Complaints such as "X is crap" without any proposal for what would be a better
alternative, are rather useless.
Do people here really expect Mick and Jamie, plus the other developers of
NVDA, to create a speech synthesiser as well as a screenreader?
By all means offer better alternatives to what is available, but otherwise
please remember that this is free software, and if you don't like what it can
do, there are more expensive alternatives.
Antony.
On Thursday 21 April 2016 at 22:58:24, Peter Beasley wrote:
As far as I am concerned, Espeak should be called C speak. The C standing
for crap.
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Kennedy
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:10 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: [nvda] espeak
i for one would love to have sapi version of espeak-ng with edward voice.
--
Users don't know what they want until they see what they get.
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
Users don't know what they want until they see what they get.
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.