Re: I take it there have been no improvements to the flawed espeak ng in 2017.4?

Sharni-Lee Ward

Funny the things you start tuning out after a while. The Roman Numerals
thing can be a bit irritating sometimes, but that's been around since I
first started using Espeak and at the time, I was so happy to actually
have a Screen-reader with which I could browse the internet (Narrator
couldn't do that at that point) that I didn't care about a few little
things that were either supposed to be pronounced like that or were
unfinished words.

My chief problem is with names. As I said, I'm a fanfiction reader and
there are so, so many Pokémon names and anime character names that are
misrendered, but since I'm using an English voice, I can hardly expect
it to cooperate with names like "Bakura", because they're not English in
origin. I'd like it to cooperate but I understand why it doesn't.

On 28/03/2018 2:23 PM, Tyler Spivey wrote:
As you said, a lot of us don't use espeak. This has the unfortunate side
effect that nobody suggests improvements.
Just to give a few examples of why I don't:

I don't like the sound of the voice. If I speed it up using rate boost
to get anything like a nice speed, sonic kicks in and makes it not sound
smooth anymore.
I suspect I'd get used to it in time, though.

The synthesizer isn't very flexible, in multiple ways.
First, the dictionary. If I want to add a word to it, I need to
recompile the whole dictionary.
There's no ability to alter it at runtime, so I can't simply edit a file
which adds to the existing dictionary and have a word pronounced
correctly, like I can do with some versions of Eloquence.

The abbreviation handling is poor, with no easy way to turn it off. For
example, in these two examples:

Mr. Smith

Mr Smith

The sound changes depending on whether the period is present or not.

I don't want to hear things like vi read as roman six. If I want that,
I'll add the ones I do want to the dictionary with their correct
capitalization/the pronunciation I want.

If a sentence doesn't start with a capital letter, there's no pause
after the last one. for example in this one.
This makes sentences run together if they're not written correctly.

There's no ability to adjust the punctuation pause (after ., ?, ,, etc).

These are just a few I can think of. If I started using it, I'm sure I'd
find more.

On 3/27/2018 5:07 PM, Sharni-Lee Ward wrote:
That's a lot of work! I'm sorry for my judgmental initial subject line.
It's just that I was very very used to the way Espeak pronounced words
like "Possible," beforehand (I was only reminded of this after sending
the other messages on this topic) and the slurring in certain words and
phrases was very distracting for me. I'm getting accustomed to it, but
that doesn't necessarily mean I /like/ it.

It's becoming clear to me, as this thread goes on, that less people use
Espeak NG than I had assumed. I figured, since it was the default synth
that came with NVDA, that more people used it, and therefore more people
would notice the oddities, and therefore you'd heard this stuff before a
lot of times. I also didn't know how much work was being done behind the
scenes, although in hindsight that was an assumption on my part and I
apologise. I still want these issues to be fixed, but throwing a fit the
way I did wasn't really helpful to anyone, and I apologise for that, too.

I don't have a Github account, or know the terms used to explain stuff
on there. Most of what I see on the Espeak NG dev list confuses the heck
out of me. xD

As for the person that said Espeak sounded very mechanical, I'll admit
that's part of the reason I use Linda almost exclusively. The other
female variants either sound overly synthetic or have weird
echos/breathiness that sounds even odder to me. The male variants didn't
play nicely with maxed inflection, and anyways, as a woman, I like my
computer to have a female voice. So Linda it is. Once you get used to
her, she's like an old friend, although I admit she sounds very robotic
coming out of speakers.

On 28/03/2018 5:17 AM, Reece H. Dunn wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:42 am, Shaun Everiss wrote:

Espeakng is nice, better than espeak but I do wish the
could be corrected, I mean there was nothing wrong with the old ones.

Taking the regression in the pronunciation of "resignedly" as an
example, this was caused by a fix to words like "allegedly" and
"reputedly" that were misporounced in espeak. The issue is that those
words without the -edly suffix end in an 'e', while "resignedly" does
not. The fix ended up adding an 'e' to "resign" when removing the
-edly suffix, causing it to sound strange. I did not detect this
because the word list I was using to compare the old and new
pronunciations did not contain "resignedly".

If there are any pronunciations that are wrong, let me know and I can
fix them (even if you just say which words they are). If you say
things like "espeak-ng sounds wrong", or "espeak-ng is broken", then I
cannot fix that as I don't know what needs changing.

Additionally, from espeak I have fixed the pronunciations for:
manoeuvred, reckon, Frances (the name), sponging, Southend, Austen,
aurora, recollect, ignoramus, straightforward, hippopotamuses,
multiple, muse, soothsay, Orion. eta. theta. zeta, lambda, delta,
thermal, sage, palazzo, cherish, resemble, visage, egress, chew,
praiseworthy, racquet(ball), pureblood, d's, h's, k's, o's, p's, t's,
y's, z's, and more. I have also fixed sir, nosir, and yessir in the
Scottish English accent.

Join to automatically receive all group messages.