Re: I've largely changed my mind about Chrome, I like it much more now
Another advantage of Chrome is that it's accessible under Mac OS and Chrome OS as well as Microsoft Windows, so if you use either of those operating systems you can easily let Chrome synchronize browser history and bookmarks across your devices.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 5/6/18, 14:05, "Angela Delicata" <email@example.com on behalf of firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I just want to thank you so much for having mentioned Chrome: I finally
decided to try it again and my experience was really amazing! It is very
fast and seems accessible using nvda!
So thank you again guys: you are a great help to me.
All the best and speak with you soon.
Angela from Italy
Il 06/05/2018 19:53, Dejan Ristic ha scritto:
> To add to what Gene has said so far, let me also say that I use Google
> Drive more than successfully via Chrome. As for streamings, Live Video
> on Facebook is possible to use via Chrome, too. Gene has mentioned
> speed, so I will simply skip this. Let me also say that the Opera
> browser is a Chrome-like one, so I use it too because it largely
> reminds me of the Chrome's features. As to skype online, I've also
> used it with Chrome, for the skype app on my Win7 64bit machine has
> gone through some errors while updating it from version to version. As
> for downloading, I've found that Chrome is a bit slower than Firefox,
> but it is not a tragedy. As to using Gmail in the Basic HTML view
> mode, Chrome is smooth, too. I also like the way the bookmarks in
> Chrome are arranged. I use them so much. As to the Messenger, I've
> found two accessibility issues:
> Firstly, I am unable to do the search of persons in messenger, while I
> do not fail on the standard facebook.
> Secondly, if I wish to forward a message in messenger, I fail, too,
> while I do not on facebook.
> I do not know how Firefox behaves as to these issues because it is
> almost unusable for me at the moment.
> On 06/05/2018 11:57, Gene wrote:
>> I may have sent messages in the past in which I expressed a much
>> stronger liking for Firefox than Chrome. At this point, I've changed
>> my mind and, unless things change over time, as they may as Firefox
>> continues to implement its new internal technical changes, I consider
>> Chrome to be superior for general browsing. I haven't tested it for
>> uses such as streaming or RSS or other uses. I will therefore only
>> address general browsing and the interface. Others may want to
>> comment on other aspects I haven't compared.
>> This is a long message, a bit of a review and a bit of discussion of
>> the interface. I hope those interested in the subject find it useful.
>> If you try Chrome and find it superior for general browsing, you may
>> still not want to use Chrome as your main browser. There are various
>> considerations. I'll explain why I changed my mind and what you may
>> want to consider. You may have other or different considerations as
>> The reason I say Chrome is better for general browsing is because it
>> loads pages faster than Firefox. You may want to compare and see if
>> the difference is important to you. There is a very noticeable
>> difference. I hadn't compared Chrome with Firefox for speed on a
>> fast machine. I compared them on a slow machine running XP perhaps
>> six or eight months ago. I had expected that, if Chrome was faster,
>> there would have been a noticeable difference, even though the
>> machine was slow. But there wasn't a difference that amounted to
>> I recently decided to compare on a reasonably fast machine running
>> Windows 7 since many people have said on lists I'm on that Chrome is
>> faster. There is a very noticeable difference in speed on my Windows
>> 7 machine. I don't know what the results would have been on a fast
>> XP machine.
>> I haven't used Chrome much but the increase in speed is the reason I
>> say it's better for general browsing.
>> The Chrome interface is different than Firefox or Internet Explorer.
>> It isn't difficult to learn but it is different. You will likely
>> want a tutorial or some instructional material. If you are good at
>> learning by exploring, you may not want or need such material, at
>> least not to use in depth, but you may benefit in early learning by
>> using material.
>> The main things to know in terms of the differences in the
>> interface are that Chrome shows many things as web pages, such as
>> settings and history and there is one menu, which you can open with
>> alt f, that is, hold alt and press f. Of course, there are submenus
>> and there are also items that open like web pages such as settings.
>> I don't recall if there are classic dialogs that open from the main
>> But if you work with settings, you need to know that the settings
>> interface doesn't work quite properly in the following way:
>> It's a web page-like interface but there some controls that don't
>> work as they should. I tried to activate two buttons today and I
>> couldn't do so in browse mode using NVDA. I don't know what JAWS
>> does. I had to manually go into forms mode, and activate the
>> buttons. I may have had to tab to the button because forms mode may
>> not have been properly calibrated with browse mode in that interface,
>> at least at times.
>> I seem to recall that in another instance, I needed to be in browse
>> mode to activate something but I'd have to experiment more to know if
>> that is the case since I don't have a clear memory of whether that
>> was necessary.
>> There's a very useful settings search feature in settings.
>> One of my main objections to Chrome in the past was that the book
>> marks interface is not nearly as comvenient to work with as Firefox
>> because the search feature in Chrome book marks appears to be
>> inaccessible. I very recently learned from someone on a list I
>> follow that this problem can be more or less eliminated. I say more
>> or less because I haven't played with it much, but enough to see that
>> it works well or reasonably well. I'm hedging because I'd want to
>> play with it more before saying just how well it works. It' appears
>> to work well from the very little testing I've done. If you are in
>> the address bar, you can type some or all of what you want to find
>> such as york times or new york times and you can up and down arrow
>> through results. Some of them will be search results using a search
>> engine but the top results in the list should be from book marks and
>> history. Try reading the current line after typing to see if that
>> contains the first result. I haven't played with the feature more
>> than a little and I'm not sure. But if it works well, this would
>> eliminate what I consider to be an important deficiency. In other
>> words, this feature may make book marks just as easy to use in Chrome
>> as in Firefox.
>> If you use Firefox extensions that you consider important and use
>> them a lot, that may be a consideration in which browser you want to
>> use. and then, there's just convenience of not learning a new
>> interface and continuing to use the familiar Firefox. You, of course,
>> can determine questions like that. It's nice to have pages load a
>> good deal faster, but the importance of speed may vary from user to
>> user. But if you haven't compared with a hands on test, you may wish
>> Browsing is either identical or nearly identical between the browsers
>> because they both use browse mode, or the Virtual PC cursor, which is
>> the JAWS name for the same thing.
>> So you can compare by installing Chrome, and then opening and
>> using some web sites. Control l moves you to the address bar, just
>> as in Firefox. I believe when you open Chrome, you are automatically
>> placed on the address bar, but you can check. If you want to make
>> sure, it takes almost no time to execute control l.
>> I hope those who are interested in this subject find these comments
>> useful. If people are curious or dissatisfied with Firefox or
>> another browser, they may want to try Chrome. I haven't used Edge at
>> all so I don't know how Edge compares.