Re: Best Synthesizer


Gene
 

They may be more responsive but they still have the issues so many of the more natural voices have, unnatural inflections, slurring between 2words, which, too often, sounds as though improper letters are in between words or a letter is missing, and mispronouncing far more words than a good older type of synthesizer like Eloquence. 
 
Synthesizers you pay for usually have demos so you can try them out and see what you think. 
 
Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Nutt
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 4:18 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Best Synthesizer

Hi,

I find a good compromise of human and responsive, is Vocalizer's compact voices.  The premium high voices, while sounding better, are not as responsive.

All the best

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: nvda@nvda.groups.io <nvda@nvda.groups.io> On Behalf Of Chris Mullins
Sent: 24 May 2018 22:13
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Best Synthesizer

It depends what you are using it for as to what is "best".  You can get more human sounding voices which are good for reading text and you can have electronic sounding voices which are much more responsive when being used when programming for example.  As someone else posted, it's the one that suits you.

Cheers
Chris  

-----Original Message-----
From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Dr. J. michael jones
Sent: 24 May 2018 13:00
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Best Synthesizer

Thanks I’m confused.   My question was what is the best? And I believe there is always a better maybe someone else has an opinion
> On May 24, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Antony Stone <antony.stone@...> wrote:
>
> SAPI is not a speech engine.  It's a definition of a protocol enabling
> speech applications (synthesis or recognition) to interface to other
> applications (such as a browser).
>
> Some synthesisers can only communicate with other applications via
> SAPI, some can do SAPI plus other protocols, some don't do SAPI at all.
>
> As Gene said, whether a synthesiser communicates using SAPI says
> nothing at all about the quality of its voices.
>
> Also, to add another answer to the original question "what is the best
> sounding synthesizer that NVDA supports?", I would say it's the one
> you like best and get on with best.  That may not be the same as what
> someone else likes.  These things are a very personal choice.
>
>
> Antony.
>
>> On Thursday 24 May 2018 at 13:47:29, Jaffar Sidek wrote:
>>
>> Also, Sapi is a speech engine native to windows.  The beauty and
>> flexibility of NVDA is that it allows for installation of Non-windows
>> synthesizer voices.  Cheers!
>>
>>> On 5/24/2018 7:26 PM, Gene wrote:
>>> It should be pointed out that SAPI is a way that voices communicate
>>> with the computer.  it has nothing to do with the kind of voice in
>>> terms of its speech or general quality.  sometimes, a synthesizer
>>> may have a SAPI version and a version that isn't SAPI.  There is no
>>> reason to use or not to use a voice because it is SAPI.
>>> Gene
>>>
>>> *From:* Chris via Groups.Io
>>> <mailto:chrismedley@...>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 24, 2018 6:02 AM
>>> *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Best Synthesizer
>>>
>>> There is nothing better than sapi voices
>>>
>>> Don’t waste your time or money on anything else. Have a nice day now
>>> 😃
>
> --
> The first fifty percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent
> of the time, and the remaining fifty percent takes another ninety percent of the time.
>
>                                                   Please reply to the list;
>                                                         please *don't* CC me.
>
>
>












Join nvda@nvda.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.