Re: "Unofficial" NVDA Add-Ons Repository
Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
I think though that one is always going to find people writing thing out of a requirement they have not always conforming to the strict guidelines we have. It is always up to the user to decide the risks.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I also concede that anyone doing this and not in the know about new nvda versions might end up having an add on that screws up the software.
Also when python 3 version of nvda comes along simply dealing with the old legal and tested add ons is going to be a very big task for somebody!
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal E-mail to:-
email@example.com, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Blackburn" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] "Unofficial" NVDA Add-Ons Repository
Safer to stick with the official add-on repository
Things have been tested there
On 3 Jun 2018, at 11:27 pm, Brian Vogel <email@example.com> wrote:
Thanks much! I'd far rather not "reinvent the wheel" and if someone has something they don't find in the official repository, or already in Jeff's, they'd ought to be sending them to him.
Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134
Explanations exist; they have existed for all time; there is always a well-known solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.
~ H.L. Mencken, AKA The Sage of Baltimore