Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [nvda] chrome not that accessible in m.facebook.com
I knew that was the problem, I had just told him to replace the M with WWW, but I wanted others to know about this.
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> On Behalf Of JM Casey
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [nvda] chrome not that accessible in m.facebook.com
Pictures do not look so great on it. It’s optimised for mobile use, as the name implies. If you send him a link, next time just replace the “m” with “www” in the url.
Funny though, I always use the mobile site too, and it works well, and I sent a link to my sighted brother to have him look at the picture to see if this was our cousin, and he said the link I sent him gave him a page that was messed up on his computer. He said it was a page for a person with that name, but he could not make sense of it.
So maybe the mobile site is not good for people not using a screenreader.
The mobile site of Facebook,
works the very best in IE 11
That is the only site I use in IE LOL! I like it better than Firefox, Even.
I have tried using Chrome and Edge for using the mobile site, and it is a lot different.
It is tricky LOL!
Have a great one, guys!
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Hi, I know exactly what you mean, for that reason I use Firefox, it actually works.
Warm regards, Claire Potter, Check out my brand new website: http://www.pottersplace.me.uk/
On 12/07/2018 20:23, Davy Cuppens wrote: