You say that you use a hotspot with your computers sometimes, but that you wouldn't use it for talking, because that uses a lot of data (and that is presumably expensive).
It may be cheaper than you think. I don't know what sort of mobile tariff you have, but a typical pay-as-you-go example in the UK is from Three, who charge 3p per minute for calls, 2p per text message, and 1p per megabyte of data.
Voice codecs used for telephony use no more than 100 kilobits per second of data - that's about 10 kilobytes per second. So, Three's 1p per megabyte of data will buy you 100 seconds of talk time, which works out considerably cheaper than paying 3p per minute for a standard mobile voice call.
I suggest you look at the tariff you get from your mobile provider and work out what a minute's work of voice-over-data would actually cost you before simply dismissing it as being too expensive.
Antony.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Monday 16 July 2018 at 21:42:45, Eleni Vamvakari wrote: It doesn't matter to me if something is popular, as long as it's accessible. Those who truly wish to talk to me have already said that they would use what works for me. I'm not going to use something that works horribly to please everyone else. I don't need stereo recording, as long as the sound is clear. I usually avoid echo cancellation and noise suppression, as I prefer omnidirectional microphones which capture everything,a and which have a good, full sound. I'm used to everything from records to mp3s at no more than 128kbps and sometimes less, so I don't need the highest sound quality. But I know that I have to use a feature on Teamtalk to prevent it from being extremely loud or distorting sound. How accessible is Google? I, too, would be interested in trying whatsapp, but I don't know how well the web version works with NVDA. I tried Messenger but although I got it to work, I was not pleased with the interface.
I, too, enjoy filt ransferring. I hate dealing with Windows Explorer in Windows 7, but in XP, it works wonderfully. This is one feature that I wish existed in NVDA Remote, but I know it wasn't designed for that purpose. I think Teamtalk supports file transfer.
What is the difference between TeamTalk and Team Speak?
I don't own or want a smart phone, as I hate touchscreens, but I do use a hotspot with my computers at times. Still, I wouldn't use it for talking, as it uses a lot of data.
On 16/07/2018, Tyler Wood <tcwood12@...> wrote:
Lol.
I remember 3.8 had 8 k audio all the time. It has been forever since quality has gone that low on skype for me *since* Microsoft bought it.
Go mobile, even on relatively good LTE, and team talk audio is so bad you can't use it. It takes nothing to make you break up whereas team speak has such a huge buffer you could probably talk in a stereo channel on satellite. Very latent, but doable. I have played around with the transmit interval on team talk to no avail.
I use zoom for work, but have yet to be mobile with it so am curious on how it will handle that. I have a lot of rural areas that get excellent HSPA coverage which should be more than enough for any audio communication, yet team talk struggles like crazy. Frustrating.
On 16-Jul-2018 2:15 PM, Lino Morales wrote:
Well I use Skype and TT on my PC not in a mobile environment due to a Android phone that has 8 GB of memory. I do 99.9 percent of my stuff on said PC with a 200 MBPS download speed on my Spectrum connection. Skype technologies SA should never should have sold their souls to the devil AKA MS. V 4.X had great audio. MS broke it.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <nvda@nvda.groups.io> on behalf of Tyler Wood <tcwood12@...> *Sent:* Monday, July 16, 2018 3:12:13 PM *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Microsoft is Killing Skype Classic on September 1 - Maybe it is for you. Not everyone needs high quality audio for voice communication, using tons of mobile internet that they don't have. I have used zoom, and I see absolutely 0 difference in audio quality. Mostly because of internal microphones with noise suppression enabled.
On 16-Jul-2018 1:46 PM, Lino Morales wrote:
If I were a podcaster I’d use Zoom or TT. Sorry, but I standby what I said. The audio is crap.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------- - *From:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <nvda@nvda.groups.io> on behalf of Sarah k Alawami <marrie12@...> *Sent:* Monday, July 16, 2018 2:44:27 PM *To:* Nvda List *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Microsoft is Killing Skype Classic on September 1 - The audio quality is fine. It’s not zoom quality but I can understand what’s beeing said, and if I can do my job still Ill take it. I am actually loving skype and I do use it on my vodcasts.
On Jul 16, 2018, at 11:38 AM, Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
The audio quality is crap. TeamTalk is better for what you want to do.
Sent fromMail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>for Windows 10
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- *From:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io><nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>> on behalf of Joshua Hendrickson <louvins@... <mailto:louvins@...>> *Sent:*Monday, July 16, 2018 2:36:56 PM *To:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io> *Subject:*Re: [nvda] Microsoft is Killing Skype Classic on September 1 - I'm not exactly a fan of the new version of skype. If I can figure out how to invite multiple people to a skype call, that would be great. However, I can use this new version of skype ok. Granted, I don't like it as well as 7.4, but I can use it.
On 7/16/18, Ervin, Glenn <glenn.ervin@...
<mailto:glenn.ervin@...>> wrote:
What ever happened to Microsoft Net Meeting? I used to use that on days of dial-up and Windows 98. Glenn
-----Original Message----- From:nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io><nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Eleni
Vamvakari Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 1:03 PM To:nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io> Subject: Re: [nvda] Microsoft is Killing Skype Classic on September 1 -
I used GW Connect for a while, but now, even the patch doesn't seem to work.
I installed it on one of my machines a few nights ago, but it wouldn't even
let me see my contacts. This is truly sad, as it was great software. I
don't know why Microsoft is forcing everyone to use their software, especially when it's not even fully accessible! Usually, I use S Portable, which is a portable version of regular Skype 7 if
I remember correctly. Granted, I don't really like the interface there
either, especially as I have to use Task Manager to close the program, but
at least it's better than the one that my friend has on his laptop! I tried
it and got a headache! Here is the link to S Portable.
https://portableapps.com/apps/internet/sportable
Personally, I liked MSN/Windows Live Messenger better than all of the above,
as it was simple, fast, and in its earlier days, didn't include all sorts of
unnecessary features! Now, I must find an accessible alternative to Skype.
*sigh*
All the best, Eleni
On 16/07/2018, Ervin, Glenn <glenn.ervin@... <mailto:glenn.ervin@...>> wrote:
Does anyone here still use GW Connect? Glenn
-----Original Message----- From:nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io><nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Sarah k
Alawami Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:29 PM To: Nvda List <nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>> Subject: [nvda] Microsoft is Killing Skype Classic on September 1 -
https://www.thurrott.com/cloud/microsoft-consumer-services/skype/163 33
7/microsoft-killing-skype-classic-september-1 -- Facebook:elvam2167@... <mailto:elvam2167@...>
anyaudio.net <http://anyaudio.net/>: elvam2167
Skype: elvam2167 -- Joshua Hendrickson
Joshua Hendrickson
-- Schrödinger's rule of data integrity: the condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted.
Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me.
|