toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
So what do you recommend I do? I really like the field, and my
research will likely not be primarily in phonetics. I also really
want to get an advanced degree in linguistics.
On 11/27/2018 8:58 PM, Brian Vogel
John, you wrote, in part: "There's nothing about sight that makes you look at an 's'
with a mark under it and immediately go "ah yes, that's the 'sh' sound,
as in English 'ship"! You learn that when you learn the IPA."
Indeed, that is true.
You also wrote, "Now, maybe it's harder because nobody bothered to name the IPA characters."
Bingo, and the character names are just a mess. I
think that most speakers of English get that "shingle", spelled s
h i n g l e, where each character has a single syllable name, much
more easily than Esh, small capital I, n, lowercase script g, l
I certainly never looked at the word shingle,
phonetically transcribed, and ever thought about the characters in
the way I do when reading text. Perhaps I'm odd. But I would no
sooner condemn someone to work with phonetic transcription who's
blind, and expect ease and proficiency, than I'd expect them to
fly to the moon using their arms as propulsion. And I'll be the
first to admit that there are plenty of sighted who never get the
hang of the IPA, either. And heaven forbid you're going to deal
with phonetics across languages, some of which take forever [if
ever] to retrain the ear to even hear (or the brain to process)
when those are not linguistically significant sounds in your first
language, then having to put those down on paper in the IPA!
Thanks, but no thanks.
But, to each his or her own. Some people like
challenges that I'd sooner avoid.
Brian - Windows 10
Home, 64-Bit, Version
1809, Build 17763
deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the
need for illusion is deep.
~ Saul Bellow, To Jerusalem and