Re: How different is NVDA different than Jaws?


Rosemarie Chavarria
 

What I like about NVDA is that it doesn't take up as much memory like Jaws does.

On 12/23/2018 8:15 AM, Clare Page wrote:
Hi!

The fact is, people’s feelings about voice synthesizers are always
subjective, we’re never going to all like the same ones. I happen to share
Brian’s dislike of Eloquence, so now that I don’t use JAWS my computer is an
Eloquence-free zone, but I respect the fact that others like its good
pronunciation of words and the fact that it sounds better at very high
speeds than some other synthesizers. Those who want Eloquence can get it
legally for NVDA now, so dislike of ESpeak doesn’t necessarily mean that
NVDA should be avoided these days, plus I gather that NVDA defaults to the
Windows voices on Windows 10, and there are plenty of extra voices available
for NVDA anyway.

For me, one important difference between NVDA and JAWS, which has nothing to
do with voices, is that NVDA is a much lighter program overall, without the
extras bundled with it that JAWS has, such as Research It and FS Reader:
also, NVDA is far less likely to add its own keystrokes for certain
operations as JAWS does, for example NVDA uses the native Windows keystroke
Windows+b to get to the system tray while JAWS felt the need to change that
to insert+F11. I’m not saying those things are wrong, use jaws if yu want
the alternative keystrokes and the extras I just mentioned: I personally
like the fact that NVDA is a much lighter program, and it’s totally optional
whether we use add-ons or not, whereas some parts of JAWS are there which
aren’t totally essential in a screen-reader.

The above is just my opinion, I’m not anti-JAWS, I just felt I should
mention what I consider to be advantages of NVDA which make it different
from jaws.

Bye for now!

From Clare



From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: dimanche 23 décembre 2018 16:18
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] How different is NVDA different than Jaws?


Are you commenting on the American or brittish voice? The Brittish voice is
terrible, obviously being programmed by people who don't speak Brittich

English and have no idea what a Brittish accent should sound like, or they
can't achieve it if they do, and the voice is given an unpleasant sound as
well. The American voice has a slight raspiness but if you speed upt the
voice to a rather fast listening speed, as a lot of people do, the raspiness
largely disappears or is reduced in how you hear it, I don't know which.


Also, Eloquence is easier to understand at fast speech rates than other
synthesizers I've heard at fast rates. And it is more accurate in word
pronunciation without adding words to a speech dictionary than any
synthesizer I've heard. It is also very responsive.


I like Brittish accents and if the Brittish voice were good, I might switch
between it and the American voice for variety and enjoyment, but its
ludicrously bad.


Gene

----- Original Message -----

From: Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io
<mailto:bglists=blueyonder.co.uk@groups.io>

Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 7:24 AM

To: nvda@nvda.groups.io

Subject: Re: [nvda] How different is NVDA different than Jaws?


Putting an alternate view here. To me anything that uses Eloquence is pretty

soon either binned or the voice altered to Espeak, Daniel or some other. I
have always hated Eloquence for its lisp and nasality, though I do
understand it is supposed to be easier at fast speeds, I find completely the

opposite. This is just my view and I'm not alone, but I would not say its a

fact for everyone. I suspect it depends on how you perceive language and
lots of other things. It is a pretty old voice now though.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal E-mail to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dang Manh Cuong" <dangmanhcuong@gmail.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] How different is NVDA different than Jaws?


Hi Maria
Beside the info of other member, the biggest different I think is NVDA
doesn't use Eloquences as the primary speech, and this also not included in
the program. If you like, you must buy it, and install into your computer.
There is an article named switching from Jaws to NVDA. If you're about to do

that, take a look at
https://github.com/nvaccess/nvda-community/wiki/SwitchingFromJawsToNVDA
Hope that help
Cuong
----------------
Dang Manh Cuong
The Assistive technology specialist
Sao Mai Vocational and assistive center for the blind
52/22 Huynh Thien Loc St., Hoa Thanh ward, Tan Phu dist., HCM, Vietnam.
Tel: +8428 7302-4488
E-mail: info@saomaicenter.org; tech@saomaicenter.org
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/saomaicenterfortheblind
Website: http://www.trungtamsaomai.org; http://www.saomaicenter.org Mobile
/ Zalo: +84 902-572-300
E-mail: dangmanhcuong@gmail.com; cuong@saomaicenter.org
Skype name: dangmanhcuong
facebook: http://facebook.com/dangmanhcuong
Twitter: @ManhCuongTech
NVDA Certified Expert: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: Maria Reyes
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 8:50 AM
Subject: [nvda] How different is NVDA different than Jaws?


How different is NVDA than Jaws? what are some differences?


Maria
blindteky@gmail.com
Want to talk all about blind technology?
Join the tech4theblind group: tech4theblind+subscribe@groups.io
Have an Apple product? Join the Apple411 group to discuss the iPhone,
iPad, and Mac. From experienced to new users.
Apple411+subscribe@groups.io












Join nvda@nvda.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.