Devin, I'd agree with that too. As long as the terminology is clear, it's just a case of making the choice.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 2/16/2019 11:00 PM, Devin Prater wrote:
I would agree with just "commands", or "input commands."
Devin Pratersent from Gmail.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 5:54 AM Ian Westerland <iwesterl@... <mailto:iwesterl@...>> wrote:
Another way around the issue might be to define what the word means in
context so "gesture" could be used within the contextual definition.
Just a thought.
On 2/16/2019 10:51 PM, Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io wrote:
> Yes we need a whole new word or phrase.
> How about user input schemes or something like that?
> bglists@... <mailto:bglists@...>
> Sent via blueyonder.
> Please address personal E-mail to:-
> briang1@... <mailto:briang1@...>,
putting 'Brian Gaff'
> in the display name field.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Bartholomew"
> <rlbart53@... <mailto:rlbart53@...>>
> To: <email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>>
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2019 10:16 AM
> Subject: [nvda] CLARITY OF TERMINOLOGY AND DOCUMENTATION
>> The underlying explanation of what input gestures are is
>> understandable; however, for me, the issue isn't semantics per
>> if the
>> top-level description isn't immediately obvious to the end-user,
>> failed in some way. In this case, the word gesture implies
>> and, so, discouraged me from finding the time to delve into an area
>> which I
>> thought wasn't relevant to me. A personal failing I admit but
>> demands upon our time so if we can weed out what we think are
>> diversions, it's often the pragmatic way to go!
>> I accept that this whole area is a minefield as you can please
>> people, some of the time, etc, etc, etc!
>> Good luck!
>> Richard Bartholomew