Re: Differences between using the NVDA and the browser commands search on a webpage


I have tried escape a number of times.  I'm not sure if it ever worked but it is not consistent.  I think it worked once and failed two or three times.  Besides, what is being discussed in terms of the cursor?  There is no cursor on the actual web page unless you are in an edit field.  So when something is searched for by a sighted person with control f, what happens?  Since there is no cursor, is the text placed in a certain area such as at the top of the document window?  Clearly, whatever is done, it is not reliable when used with browse mode.  I and others have reported that results are not consistent.  NVDA developers didn't go through the trouble of developing a browse mode find command just for enjoyment.  they did so because it is necessary.
Window-eyes had a separate browse mode search, JAWS does and NVDA does.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Differences between using the NVDA and the browser commands search on a webpage

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:13 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:
I open a web page, hit control-F, type in what I'm looking for, press enter, then press escape,
You do realize, Travis, that you omitted that last part about pressing Escape until this very post.  And that's the pivotal trick to getting the method you use to work.

It is also, to me, a very kludgey way to get the same result that every screen reader gives you using its built-in search, and with no more key presses.  Having to press the modifier key as part of the search, rather than Escape after the search, is a heck of a lot more natural to me when working with a screen reader.

But, it's clear now that there is a technique that can be made to work if one chooses to use a straight browser search:  hitting Escape.    I still find the dead silence while I'm looking for something, particularly when that something repeats, particularly unhelpful.  I have been known, on rare occasions, to tell someone something like, "find the fifth occurrence of supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" on the page.  I find that most of them find it much easier when they can hear occurrences one through four as they search through.

To each his or her own.

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763  

A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.

          ~ Saul Bellow, To Jerusalem and Back



Join to automatically receive all group messages.