toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I think you have it backwards.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:13
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser
I don't know if you are totally wrong, I don't think you would
In my experiences, what I notice over the time is that the programs
which have 64 bit versions goes to the X86 folder whereas those which are 32
goes to the other one.
That being said, I don't know why Kevin was
expecting the program to install on a different folder if it's a 64 bit
program as far as I could see based on what he wrote.
Em 28/02/2019 19:06, James AUSTIN
I could be wrong about this so please correct me somebody if so, but I think that the suffix X 86 for program files points to user installed applications. The original program files points to applications installed by Windows. However in most installation wizards I have used you can choose where to install files.
On 28 Feb 2019, at 21:53, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io <the.big.white.shepherd@...> wrote:
Hi, I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version. at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer. any ideas anyone else had this?
On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.
If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all
It's only fair that one should be wary.
Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
Well its the latest chromium alternertive.
FFull add blocking and extra security.
I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.
Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.
Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.
If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.
This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.
One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.
Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.
But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.
The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.
If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.
Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.
Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.
Ports come and go.
It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.
CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.
Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.
Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.
And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.
I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.
Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.
THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.
Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.
I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.
On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser
How do we know this is a safe browser?
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)