toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Out of curiosity most installs of jaws I have seen are not on a
huge network There might be lone machines I mean only a copy on
one pc out of all of them on a network.
If so have they got it so the remote add on will not work on a
huge network or some how have it disabled.
I mean as in there version of the addon tandam.
Or are they happy to let the person use a tandam remote part of
The reason I ask this is here in new Zealand the 3 large networks
which are library networks have nvda installed on all of there
The APN K network 750 computers.Christ church libraries 390
Auckland libraries 600 computers all with nvda on them.
So I would be guessing they would have to lock down the remote
add on some how if it was installed into nvda you would say for
I know if nvda is not running then it does not matter.
I guess we will have to wait and see what happens.
home use etc does not matter but a large network might and might
be one of the questions from them to know how to do it if part of
On 15/01/2020 2:02 pm, Sarah k Alawami
Agreed. I still don't understand why it is not
added to core. After all we have jaws tandem and no one
complains about it. So why not nvda remote in nvda itself?
This would be useful for us personal helpers too. I hear
that feedback all the time on the phone, or on twitter etc.
Sarah Alawami, owner of TFFP. . For more info go
to our website. This is also our
libsyn page as well.
to subscribe to the feed click here
Our telegram channel is also a good
place for an announce only in regard to podcasts, contests,
Our discord is where you will know
when we go live on youtube, twitch and mixer. Thanks
Finally, to become a patron and help support the
podcast go here
On 14 Jan 2020, at 16:35, Robert Kingett wrote:
This is the beauty of open source software. I
only wish this could be added to the core without non
profits and government people freaking out about it. I'm
beyond happy this is an open source project. The add on,
and the screen reader. I also, of course, understand why
many see this add on as a possible security risk. While I
don't think the same way, I can understand the need for
high security assurance. Could multiple people from the
NVDA community be in charge of that github page so they
could review and merge changes if the developers become
completely tired of it in the future?