No. Jaws tandem is a problem for a lot of corporations and offices.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Or that's at least what they believe.
That's why FS have created a way for customized non tandem installers.
On 1/15/20, Lenron <lenron93@...> wrote:
It's insane after all jaws has remote and it's not a problem.
On 1/14/20, Mark via Groups.Io <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I agree 100% as team leader of a tech team we use nvda remote all the
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Sarah k Alawami
Sent: 15 January 2020 01:02
Subject: Re: [nvda] State of the NvDA Remote add-on: NV Access sent
to add-on authors
Agreed. I still don't understand why it is not added to core. After all
have jaws tandem and no one complains about it. So why not nvda remote in
nvda itself? This would be useful for us personal helpers too. I hear
feedback all the time on the phone, or on twitter etc.
Sarah Alawami, owner of TFFP. . For more info go to our website. This is
also our libsyn page as well.
to subscribe to the feed click here
Our telegram channel is also a good place for an announce only in regard
podcasts, contests, etc.
Our discord is where you will know when we go live on youtube, twitch and
mixer. Thanks Restream staff.
Finally, to become a patron and help support the podcast go here
On 14 Jan 2020, at 16:35, Robert Kingett wrote:
This is the beauty of open source software. I only wish this could be
to the core without non profits and government people freaking out about
I'm beyond happy this is an open source project. The add on, and the
reader. I also, of course, understand why many see this add on as a
security risk. While I don't think the same way, I can understand the
for high security assurance. Could multiple people from the NVDA
be in charge of that github page so they could review and merge changes
the developers become completely tired of it in the future?