On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 02:52 PM, Bob Cavanaugh wrote:
I had several versions of it in my inbox. I don't know why it wasn't muerged into one big thread, but it wasn't.-
It was, in the archive, but that's the only place that a topic that's been split, whether accidentally or intentionally, can be merged back together.
All it takes is the person sending a reply making a single character change in the subject of the message, or correcting a spelling or capitalization, or similar, for a single topic to be split into two as far as e-mail clients are concerned. And those who reply to the original topic will show up on that topic, and those who reply to any message in a revised subject topic will end up on that one.
There is no way for any list administrator to fix that, as e-mail threading itself is what causes that split.
That is why I have, on multiple groups, asked people to avoid changing subject lines. And on those occasions where I need to re-title a topic so that future archive searchers are likely to find it, I always send out a message with the revised title and ask all who wish to respond from that point forward to use that message, or one that is a direct response to it, as the thing to reply to, not the original.
I spend a lot of time merging topics split by members, whether by intent or by accident. But I can only make them come together again in the archive, not in email clients. And if a member takes a topic that you've muted or unfollowed, and changes the subject line, it will appear again because it is considered a new topic, both by e-mail clients and groups.io.
Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042
The depths of denial one can be pushed to by outside forces of disapproval can make you not even recognize yourself to yourself.
~ Brian Vogel