Re: NVDA Satisfaction Survey 2021
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That’s fine. In fact, I agree that you need a balancing question that challenges the positive assertions so the need to have the responder identify as a tester or user is fine and should do the trick!
I appreciate your full answer
All the best,
m +353 (0)833323487 Ph: _353 (0)1-2864623 e: cearbhall.omeadhra@...
From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> On Behalf Of Quentin Christensen
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] NVDA Satisfaction Survey 2021
Yes that's basically it - the third question, “Is the use primarily for Accessibility testing?” , is essentially meant to distinguish those who use NVDA primarily as end-users from those who probably aren't end-users and use NVDA primarily for accessibility testing. Or in other words, so we can find out how highly end users rate NVDA as being useful in meeting their needs, and how highly it gets rated by non-end user developers and testers in meeting how they use it.
Of course there will be a fair bit of overlap and quite a large proportion of end users will say that even just relying on NVDA means you spend an amount of time doing the testing and documenting of issues which developers may not have done. I guess the intent then is in that word "primarily" - if you are an end-user, then yes we know you likely provide feedback to us and others to help make products better - and we very much appreciate that, but your experience will still be different to those who are sighted web developers and only use NVDA occasionally to test changes to a site for instance.
So, that question particularly may not be perfect, but we went for simplicity originally (and consistency this year in keeping the same wording). If you're unsure, go with your gut instinct :)
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:23 AM Brian Vogel <britechguy@...> wrote: