toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The one thing some don't get is the company you work for desides
what software they want on there computers. You as a employ have
very little say in that. Even when it comes to accessibility.
My job used xp with jfw 9. When current was win7 and jfw 16 at
them time. The software would of worked better updated. But, not
my box and sysops says what goes on box.
On 5/26/2021 10:20 AM, Brian Vogel
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:32 AM, JM Casey wrote:
the OP stated that his employer leaves him no choice
in that matter.
I read that as meaning that encryption is required, and nothing
more. I could be wrong. But were I in this position, I would be
pushing back against the need for drive encryption in general and
BitLocker in particular. It's gross overkill if it's strictly
client data that you're seeking to encrypt.
There are other alternatives. And the one I mentioned has now
been confirmed as fully accessible and does not require full drive
encryption. There are others, too.
Brian - Windows 10, 64-Bit, Version
21H1, Build 19043
I do not understand why some seek
to separate a person from their actions. The self is
composed of an individual’s thoughts, actions, and
expression, which are contained in and actuated by the
body. What you do and say is the clearest indicator of who