1. posterid:21621
  2. Adobe Acrobat reader & NVDA

Re: Adobe Acrobat reader & NVDA

David Goldfield
 

The only issue that I have with Vivaldi from the perspective of accessibility is that the toolbar controls are being rendered in the virtual buffer along with the contents of the Web page. Brave had the same issue in its early days but they’ve long since fixed it. I really should alert the Vivaldi developers about this as I have no doubt they’d want to know and that they’d very likely try to correct it.

 

David Goldfield,

Blindness Assistive Technology Specialist

NVDA Certified Expert

 

Subscribe to the Tech-VI announcement list to receive news, events and information regarding the blindness assistive technology field.

Email: tech-vi+subscribe@groups.io

www.DavidGoldfield.org

 

From: nvda@nvda.groups.io <nvda@nvda.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 1:15 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Adobe Acrobat reader & NVDA

 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:45 PM, Gene wrote:

I don't know about Vivaldi. 

-
Gene, when I said, "Chromium-based browsers, but the two that are my daily drivers are Vivaldi and Brave," I have no idea how I could have been any clearer.

Edge is one, too, and there are plenty more where all three of those came from.  The Chromium code base is really being exploited by myriad developers these days.

Firefox, which is not Chromium-based, also seems to have a number of folks who've created what amount to forks of Firefox.  Two that spring to mind are WaterFox and, if memory serves, Pale Moon, though I could be wrong about the latter.
--

Brian - Windows 10, 64-Bit, Version 21H2, Build 19044  

The difference between a top-flight creative man and the hack is his ability to express powerful meanings indirectly.

         ~ Vance Packard
Join nvda@nvda.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.