facing some problem on gmail standard view with nvda 2021.1
farhan israk
I am using the standard view of gmail on google chrome 91 with nvda 2021.1. I am not able to read word by word properly. If I press ctrl + arrow key, nvda is changing focus to subject box or send button. Sometimes, I can read word. Sometimes, it changes focus to subject box or send button. how can i fix it?
|
||
|
||
ui automation
farhan israk
What is ui automation? How does effect it affect our daily life?
|
||
|
||
Re: has NVDA remote addon been updated
Robert Doc Wright godfearer
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
yes, It is working for me after the NVDA
update.
|
||
|
||
Re: Nvda addons
Robert Doc Wright godfearer
I did not have that problem with the two you mentioned.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Canazzi" <aa2vm@roadrunner.com> To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 8:29 AM Subject: Re: [nvda] Nvda addons Hi Group,
|
||
|
||
Re: Nvda addons
Robert Doc Wright godfearer
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Out of curiosity is there any reason why the
features in the clip speak addon was not made part of the foundation in NVDA? I
would think that knowing that you have actually triggored a command as basic as
copy, paste, cut...would be important to hear.
----- Original Message -----
|
||
|
||
Re: Training Materials
Quentin Christensen
Hi Bob, I'm the one you need to help with this :) We've just recently updated the Basic Training to ensure it is up to date. We considered offering a discount to those who did purchase the original version back in 2016 / 2017, and in the end we decided to offer a straight 50% discount to everyone, and it's still on sale in our shop: https://www.nvaccess.org/product/basic-training-for-nvda-ebook/ In uploading the new version, I made one small error during the process, which broke the download for some users who had previously purchased earlier versions of the material. I do apologise for that. I've just emailed you with your version of Basic Training for NVDA. If you are interested in the newer edition, we have it on sale as noted, at the previous link. The zip file includes the module in as a Microsoft Word .docx document, as a .html web page, as an .ePub eBook, and as a Kindle .kfx book. If you've got a Kindle device (or use the Kindle app for PC or on your phone), you should be able to download that version and open it in that. Kind regards, and apologies for the inconvenience. Quentin.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:19 PM Bob Cole <rkcole72984@...> wrote: Hello, everyone. --
Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess
|
||
|
||
Clip speak
Sky Mundell
Hello guys. I have a question. What's the status on the Clip speak add on
working with NVDA 2021? I used Clip speak quite a bit as I like to know when a text is cut, copied, and pasted to and from the clipboard. I also train on NVDA with clients and as part of the installation I add the Clip speak add-on into NVDA so that my clients know when they are copying text to the clipboard. I have emailed, or have attempted to email Damien but the email comes back as undeliverable
|
||
|
||
Training Materials
Bob Cole
Hello, everyone.
I’m not quite sure where this message belongs, so I apologize if it’s in the wrong place. In 2019, I purchased the training materials from the online shop. One purchase was for the NVDA basic training, and the other was for training books for Microsoft word and Microsoft excel. I had downloaded all of the manuals to my old phone. I ended up having to sell the phone because of financial issues. On the shop website, I’m given the option to download the books for Microsoft word in for Microsoft XL, but not for the basic training manual. I was thinking about just re-investing in the basic training manual, but through the Kindle app this time… I have two questions pertaining to this: 1) Are the manual still relevant and updated considering that the original publication date was in 2016? 2) Why is the download link not available to re-download the NVDA basic training manual or is that just a one time download? Thank you so much for any and all help concerning this.
|
||
|
||
Re: DECtalk Add-on for NVDA
Arlene
Oh that’s good. All the world to you. I still don’t want the bother hooking it to a usb port. No thanks. I liked Dectalk when I had it. Now that its gone. I won’t look for another dectalk express.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Pamela Dominguez
Sent: July 12, 2021 6:50 PM To: nvda@nvda.groups.io Subject: Re: [nvda] decktalk addon for nvda
I had mine hooked up to a USB port by a cable that has serial on one end and usb on the other end. Pam.
Oh yes they were. That’s why Iam glad my dectalk express bit the dust. It was driven by a serial port. These newer computers do not have support for those kinds of things. That’s why I’m truly glad my dectalk express died. For that reason I do not want to go back to it as much as I liked it.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Howard Traxler
Those old DECtalks were pretty big and were driven from a serial port (RS232). I have five of them that I have not tried with NVDA yet. If anyone would like one (or a couple) let me know, We could come to a deal.
Howard
On 7/11/2021 3:34 AM, Ian Blackburn wrote: > The deck talk that sounded the best was the one that was about as big as a flatbed scanner Version two it was > On 11 Jul 2021, at 4:30 pm, Ian Blackburn <ianblackburn@...> wrote: > > The hardware dick talk is USB driven it sounds okay but I haven’t used one for at least 10 or 11 years > On 11 Jul 2021, at 4:24 pm, Curtis Delzer <curtis@...> wrote: > > I am using dectalk with NVDA 20000-4 > and hopefully the add-on will be updated. Seems it was legal when I got it. > > Curtis Delzer > HS > K 6 V F O > Rialto, CA > > curtis@... > > On 7/10/2021 12:33 PM, Sarah k Alawami wrote: >> I also like decktalk and eloquence, I would pay for a decktlak add on if one existed as well. >> *From:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <nvda@nvda.groups.io> *On Behalf Of *Micallef Michael at FITA >> *Sent:* Friday, July 9, 2021 7:07 PM >> *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io >> *Subject:* Re: [nvda] decktalk addon for nvda >> I agree with Gene 100% the only dectalk version that is available is a hardware based in a usb versio, and its not cheap and because I never heard it I don’t know about its speech quality compared with the dectalk of the venerable window-eyes. >> *From:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io> <nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>> *On Behalf Of *Gene via groups.io >> *Sent:* Saturday, 10 July 2021 02:01 >> *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io> >> *Subject:* Re: [nvda] decktalk addon for nvda >> CAUTION:This email originated from OUTSIDE the Government Email Infrastructure. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe. >> As far as I know, there is no legal Dectalk add-on at least not one that sounds at all like what would be expected. I don’t know if it is possible to purchase Dectalk as a stand alone synthesizer, such as a SAPI 5 synthesizer, but I’ve never heard of that either. >> You may be able to get more information about the legal ability to purchase Dectalk with a search but I’ve been on this list since the rather early days of NVDA, and I think there would have been information on the list before this if there were a legal add-on, and a legal way to ;purchase Dectalk, at least at anything like a reasonable price, given the interest in Dectalk. >> Years ago, someone who worked with Dectalk provided a legal version of Dectalk but it was evidently very old and it sounded very different than the Dectalk people expect. >> Gene >> -----Original Message----- >> *From:*Josh Kennedy <mailto:joshknnd1982@...> >> *Sent:*Friday, July 09, 2021 6:42 PM >> *To:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io> >> *Subject:*Re: [nvda] decktalk addon for nvda >> I would like a decTalk addon that works with NVDA2021.1 as well, but I prefer decTalk 4.41 through 4.6. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
|
||
|
||
Re: In NVDA, most Microsoft OneCore voices are the same voice for me.
Quentin Christensen
It sounds like the OneCore voices / languages might have been corrupted - I've seen that happen (with various results) elsewhere - try removing and re-adding a language / language pack and see if that helps. Kind regards Quentin.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:10 PM John Isige <gwynn@...> wrote:
--
Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess
|
||
|
||
Re: more about disabled addons
Andre Fisher
Hi.
Note that NV Access neither packages nor maintains about 95% of the official add-ons. The few add-ons that they have actually authored (OCR and NV Speech Player) are free for the community to take over. It's a common misconception that needs to be addressed. These add-ons aren't like Window Eyes apps, they are made, for the most part, solely by the community. Not even NVDA Remote is made by them, despite NV Access people in the past admitting to using it. Contact the developers and see how best they can update the add-ons.
|
||
|
||
Re: has NVDA remote addon been updated
where do you get addon packer?
On 13/07/2021 11:17 am, abdul muhamin
wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: In NVDA, most Microsoft OneCore voices are the same voice for me.
John Isige
Rebooted the PC, this has actually been going on for a while. I
assumed it was just Windows being messed up. I also restarted with
addons disabled, and no difference whatsoever. It's pretty weird.
On 7/12/2021 9:53 PM, Quentin
Christensen wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: more about disabled addons
Hi, Yes - a variation was suggested almost a decade ago: https://github.com/nvaccess/nvda/issues/3208 And it appears that the days of Add-on Updater is numbered, to be replaced by something better. More on that later. Cheers, Joseph
|
||
|
||
Re: has NVDA remote addon been updated
Hi, Note that if you are using Add-on Updater, the new update won't show up yet as the website metadata hasn't been updated just yet. Cheers, Joseph
|
||
|
||
Re: more about disabled addons
Steve Wettlaufer
I would agree with that. Add-on Updater is extremely handy. Has there ever been talk of making it core functionality in NVDA itself? Steve
On 2021-07-12 7:22 p.m., Joseph Lee
wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: has NVDA remote addon been updated
Quentin Christensen
Just to answer my own question from earlier - I worked out just after I asked, that yes, NVDARemote 2.4 is the latest version, has been updated, and is compatible with NVDA 2019.3 and later, including NVDA 2021.1 - so they left the wording unchanged, even though that makes it a little ambiguous.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:14 AM Quentin Christensen via groups.io <quentin=nvaccess.org@groups.io> wrote:
--
Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess
|
||
|
||
Re: In NVDA, most Microsoft OneCore voices are the same voice for me.
Quentin Christensen
Firstly, Have you rebooted the PC since updating? It's worth doing that as we do often see odd things like this after updating and before restarting. Next, if you press NVDA+Q then down arrow to "Restart with add-ons disabled" does that make a difference? Kind regards Quentin.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:13 AM John Isige <gwynn@...> wrote: Hi all. --
Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess
|
||
|
||
Re: NV Speech Player?
Quentin Christensen
NVDA remote has been updated, the website is a bit tricky - this version, updated today, does actually work with NVDA 2019.3 and later (including 2021.1) so the wording evidently hasn't been changed, but you'll notice it's now version 2.4: https://nvdaremote.com/download/ For NV Speech Player, there is a note on the project GitHub page at: https://github.com/nvaccess/NVSpeechPlayer "Maintenance Note NV Access is no longer maintaining this project. If you make use of this project or find it interesting, and you have the time and expertise to maintain it, please feel free to fork it and let us know you are interested in taking it on. This includes the speechPlayer core itself, plus the nvSpeechPlayer NVDA add-on also in this repository. Note that the eSpeak-ng/espeak-ng project also includes a copy of the speechPlayer code as an alternative Klatt implementation." So, while I'm sorry to have to let you know we're not updating it, i would encourage you to further investigate eSpeak-NG in NVDA 2021.1 - and also if any developers are interesting in taking it on and updating it, the opportunity is there. Kind regards Quentin.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:46 AM Chris Smart <ve3rwj@...> wrote: Is it true what I'm reading on Twitter, that NVDA Remote hasn't been --
Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess
|
||
|
||
Re: more about disabled addons
John Isige
For my part, the addons community is doing awesome work. It's
just that there are some addons that are only incompatible because
the versions aren't set correctly. I wouldn't necessarily expect
anybody to do work on addons that really needed major work to
update, although obviously we hope somebody in the community will
take stuff over. But I feel like you could set up a pretty simple
script to do version changes, and then test addons to see if they
work, obviously the testing entails a bit of work. So I'm not so
much complaining about a lack of addons, as I am suggesting that
maybe a simple version change shouldn't require the original
maintainer to be involved, particularly if they can't be
contacted. Maybe I'm wrong and this is a lot more work than I
think it is, hence why it's a suggestion.
On 7/12/2021 6:40 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
|
||
|