I was about to say even the installer for Jaws is only a couple hundred mb. I have my own reasons for not liking it so much these days. Part of that is the stupid video driver thing doesn't seem

Jeff You can read the date and size attributes in Details view by using right arrow when positioned on a particular file. This pre-supposes you have these attributes selected for display. The size

which is the point I was making in my original post. Joseph's points are what I would consider bloatware. unnecessary memory usage, decreased performance, size of the core executable

Hi, I understand that. But think about the effects of integrating add-ons into NVDA, especially those that are no longer maintained (or maintained for a while and no more), causes conflicts

That's something I can't comment on. Gene

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 02:58 PM, Joseph Lee wrote: I think we may need to consider other forms of bloat, namely performance, memory usage, conflicts and what not.Distilled to a bumper sticker:

Hi, I think we may need to consider other forms of bloat, namely performance, memory usage, conflicts and what not. For every global plugin that gets integrated (or not), NVDA must loop through them

The reason I discussed size is that that has been the main reason given by people who oppose this idea. You have pointed out lots of other considerations but my point is that if you add a good many

in nvda preferences, object presentation, the first item is report tooltip. press space on it to activate it and then press tab to okay. this item unfortunately is not activated by default, and many

This RSS feed will show you new add ons published but it will not group add ons by last updated. To check for updates, get the add on updater. https://addons.nvda-project.org/index.en.rss Add ons

remote should totally be rolled into NVDA. -- Lenron Brown Cell: 985-271-2832 Skype: ron.brown762

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:35 PM, Devin Prater wrote: I knew about the page, but I’ve never seen an Outlook add-on, neither there before nor discussed on list.I honestly can't say which specific

Hi, I must disagree with just using size as the measure of quality of add-ons: Size: add-ons are small because they are compressed – they are essentially zipped packages. When uncompressed, it can

First, as to the size of add-ons, my impression is that they are generally small and that you can incorporate many, perhaps a large number, without making the program larger enough to matter to any

I knew about the page, but I’ve never seen an Outlook add-on, neither there before nor discussed on list. This is great, and if it helps with the control+. (Period) in speaking the next message

My reference point is Window-Eyes since I converted from it to NVDA. When in File Explorer and arrowing up and down a file list, WE additionally announces things like file size, date of modification,

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:31 AM, Joseph Lee wrote: I’ll instruct the add-ons community to start porting our add-ons to Python 3 and give that a priority boost for a while.And, for the flip side of

further to my last, I also am a firm believer that if your application has default keystrokes, you should not need to completely remap the keyboard to make the application

this, I am in complete agreement with, because on the whole, the concept you're proposing flies in the face of what NVDA is truly all about. It has been stated time and time

No one will read that final dialogue. I don't eve rread the finished dialogues of software except to search for any errors.if info is missed, it's my fault but I don't have to time to speed read