Carlos, if you're going to be using alpha builds, it's wise to use that as a portable version. When you use an alpha, it means you're agreeing to using a version which, by the very nature of the

You say which needs to be esigned. Does that mean scanned? If you are printing it as an alternative, try opening the document and printing it in a browser such as Chrome, Edhge, Brave or Firefox. I

Good Afternoon: I can open other PDF files with Adobe with no problem. It's just this file, which needs to be esigned, that is causing a problem. That's what seemed to be questionable.

Hi, To summarize Brian's points, if you are using alpha builds, you are on your own and are responsible for providing timely feedback. In anticipation of follow-up questions about delaying backward

- Joseph, Which I really would have assumed. But this does not change the fact that it is absolutely unrealistic for those choosing to use alpha builds, months out, will not have issues such as

Hi Carlos, Do not be afraid - add-ons community is aware of your concerns and authors are working on updating their add-ons. So here is what's going on: remember back in July I explained that a

The command you are talking about does exactly the opposite. It means that the review position will change as the cursor changes in a word processor document where there is a cursor or in a list and

Also, anyone considering the HP BIOS Configuration Utility should take a look at its User Guide to determine if they even want to "go there." -- Brian - Windows 10, 64-Bit, Version 21H1, Build 19043

- And unless you happen to know exactly what you're doing, I would never recommend that an end user go this route unless they are already intimately familiar with updating UEFI/BIOS, and very few

- Amen! Anyone who elects to use alpha software should, routinely, expect all sorts of issues, including lack of backward compatibility. It is completely, utterly unrealistic to expect alpha

Are you using browse mode or working directly in the program? That may be what is causing the problem. If you are using browse mode in a word processor, try reading when not in browse mode and see

Well the same drama hit audiogames forum. No one will be leaving nvda, I mean brousers get updates, windows gets updates to get in line with things. Python is a versatile language and

I 100% agree. There is no reason to get paranoid this quickly, 2022.1 is still months away and I'm sure addons will be compatible by the time 2022.1 is released. I also commend the developers for

Such is life with software, especially that of the alpha kind. In order to move forward, things are changed. This, unfortunately, breaks backwards compatibility. I will

Hi Carlos, as far as I know they are striving to only break addons once a year at the .1 release. I suggest reading this thread as Joseph Lee's explanations in particular will hopefully give you a

Today I downloaded the alpha version of nvda 2022.1. And, once again add-ons will need to be updated to work with nvda 2022.1. Someone really needs to come up with some kind of add-ons patch that

Block quote: What are you pressing to start say all? There are two of them. One starts from the system cursor, the other one starts from the review cursor. The one that starts from the review cursor

Sorry folks, Didn’t sign my name on last post. Kind regards, Dennis huckle.

Hello all, I can definitely confirm that to do anything in the bios you, like me will need sighted assistance. Of course its really important that you know exactly what you want to achieve so as to

What are you pressing to start say all? There are two of them. One starts from the system cursor, the other one starts from the review cursor. The one that starts from the review cursor doesn't move