|
Re: the latest version of add on updater
Well the reason its in the dev section is that its not stable.
If you run the beta version of nvda, then the current add on updater works fine, if its the stable nvda, its seems not to, but its
Well the reason its in the dev section is that its not stable.
If you run the beta version of nvda, then the current add on updater works fine, if its the stable nvda, its seems not to, but its
|
By
Brian's Mail list account
·
#45926
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
The point is that as far as I am aware nobody built in any kind of support for sound cards for a dos machine, only external synths. This was due to the slower processors and lack of memory, remember
The point is that as far as I am aware nobody built in any kind of support for sound cards for a dos machine, only external synths. This was due to the slower processors and lack of memory, remember
|
By
Brian's Mail list account
·
#45925
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
Its probably going to be sold o the British Government its about their level of IT understanding. :-)
Brian
bglists@...
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal E-mail
Its probably going to be sold o the British Government its about their level of IT understanding. :-)
Brian
bglists@...
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal E-mail
|
By
Brian's Mail list account
·
#45924
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
Actually, if you really mean dos and not an emulated dos then no. As nvda requires the resources of the windows nt shell.
However Hal for dos was still available but you do need a hardware synth for
Actually, if you really mean dos and not an emulated dos then no. As nvda requires the resources of the windows nt shell.
However Hal for dos was still available but you do need a hardware synth for
|
By
Brian's Mail list account
·
#45923
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
Hi!
DosBox itself will not speak unless you run a DOS screen reader inside
of it. A complete setup including three DOS screen readers can be
downloaded
Hi!
DosBox itself will not speak unless you run a DOS screen reader inside
of it. A complete setup including three DOS screen readers can be
downloaded
|
By
Felix G.
·
#45922
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
You could always use a copy of the ASAP screen reader.
73 N2DYN Angelo
You could always use a copy of the ASAP screen reader.
73 N2DYN Angelo
|
By
Angelo Sonnesso
·
#45921
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
but don't you still need to run a screen reader for dos box?
I haven't used dos in so long things may have changed
--
check out my song on youtube
https://youtu.be/YeWgx2LRu7Y
but don't you still need to run a screen reader for dos box?
I haven't used dos in so long things may have changed
--
check out my song on youtube
https://youtu.be/YeWgx2LRu7Y
|
By
The Wolf
·
#45920
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
As others have said, no way will NVDA run without Windows, but I'm curious
about why you want to build a DOS machine anyway?
What do you plan to do with it?
Antony.
--
"640 kilobytes (of RAM)
As others have said, no way will NVDA run without Windows, but I'm curious
about why you want to build a DOS machine anyway?
What do you plan to do with it?
Antony.
--
"640 kilobytes (of RAM)
|
By
Antony Stone
·
#45919
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
Actually you got the name wrong. Its name is Vocal-eyes, not Vocalizer
Actually you got the name wrong. Its name is Vocal-eyes, not Vocalizer
|
By
Sky Mundell
·
#45918
·
|
|
Re: Screen Reader under DOS
probably have to use vocalizer for dos or jaws for dos. Or you could run a windows machine with dos box.
probably have to use vocalizer for dos or jaws for dos. Or you could run a windows machine with dos box.
|
By
Isaac <bigikemusic@...>
·
#45917
·
|
|
Re: the latest version of add on updater
Hi,
Travis is correct: I intend to not release a stable version of this add-on, as lessons learned through this add-on will be applied to a feature which I'm writing for NVDA.
Cheers,
Joseph
Hi,
Travis is correct: I intend to not release a stable version of this add-on, as lessons learned through this add-on will be applied to a feature which I'm writing for NVDA.
Cheers,
Joseph
|
By
Joseph Lee
·
#45916
·
|
|
Re: regular expression and speech dic
Glad to hear you've got it solved.
That second capture group is interesting, that's for sure.
--
Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134
The psychology of adultery has been
Glad to hear you've got it solved.
That second capture group is interesting, that's for sure.
--
Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134
The psychology of adultery has been
|
By
Brian Vogel
·
#45915
·
|
|
Re: regular expression and speech dic
I finally got it working like this:
(lv)([0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+|[^a-zA-Z])
Brian Vogel 於 26/8/2018 11:46 寫道:
I finally got it working like this:
(lv)([0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+|[^a-zA-Z])
Brian Vogel 於 26/8/2018 11:46 寫道:
|
By
Mr. Wong Chi Wai, William <cwwong.pro@...>
·
#45914
·
|
|
Re: regular expression and speech dic
William,
Everything's good, your command of English is far, far, far, far [. . .] better than my command of Chinese.
If the last regular expression I offered does not catch what you
William,
Everything's good, your command of English is far, far, far, far [. . .] better than my command of Chinese.
If the last regular expression I offered does not catch what you
|
By
Brian Vogel
·
#45913
·
|
|
Re: regular expression and speech dic
Brian
Thanks.
Well, this is how Chinese work. Chinese normally don't have spaces between words. Unlike English there are lots of spaces, Chinese almost have no spaces.
For the
Brian
Thanks.
Well, this is how Chinese work. Chinese normally don't have spaces between words. Unlike English there are lots of spaces, Chinese almost have no spaces.
For the
|
By
Mr. Wong Chi Wai, William <cwwong.pro@...>
·
#45912
·
|
|
Re: Future of speech synth add ons
Oh, I forgot to mention in my first post that those using Codefactory's Sapi version of their synth probably won't be affected. Thanks for bringing that up.
If Tifflotecnia's add on stops working with
Oh, I forgot to mention in my first post that those using Codefactory's Sapi version of their synth probably won't be affected. Thanks for bringing that up.
If Tifflotecnia's add on stops working with
|
By
Supanut Leepaisomboon
·
#45911
·
|
|
Re: Future of speech synth add ons
Fortunately, I use a SAPI 5 version of Eloquence from Kodefactory
Fortunately, I use a SAPI 5 version of Eloquence from Kodefactory
|
By
Sky Mundell
·
#45910
·
|
|
Re: Future of speech synth add ons
I hope they can update Tiflotecnia's Vocalizer for NVDA to the new Vocalizer Expressive version by Nuance, if that's the case, I'm going to purchase a new lisence for the version. I shurely have the
I hope they can update Tiflotecnia's Vocalizer for NVDA to the new Vocalizer Expressive version by Nuance, if that's the case, I'm going to purchase a new lisence for the version. I shurely have the
|
By
Luis Carlos González Moráles
·
#45909
·
|
|
Re: Future of speech synth add ons
Well, we have been told that a major update is coming, but to this day we haven't seen any major updates from Tifflotecnia. But since NVDA 2018.3 will break compatibility with add ons not updated to
Well, we have been told that a major update is coming, but to this day we haven't seen any major updates from Tifflotecnia. But since NVDA 2018.3 will break compatibility with add ons not updated to
|
By
Supanut Leepaisomboon
·
#45908
·
|
|
Re: Future of speech synth add ons
I’m sure tiflotechica will update theirs in a good time, but I doubt Code factory will. In any case, the community will update their addons just fine, I’m sure.
I’m sure tiflotechica will update theirs in a good time, but I doubt Code factory will. In any case, the community will update their addons just fine, I’m sure.
|
By
Devin Prater
·
#45907
·
|