Hello everyone, I have been intending to write this message for the past few days, however decided to wait to see if discussions of such nature continued. It seems as if they have, so I am sending

I generally use Chrome because it seems, from the small amount of comparison I've done, to be faster and Firefox may lose its place on more complex pages until the pages really fully load. But I

Zahra, its time you moved on. Xp is long gone. I know it meets your needs. What are you going to do if that computer dies. It’s not good to cling to the old clunker xp. The longer you stay with xp

Well, I find Chrome more responsive then firefox. It could have been that the last computer I had was 7 and it was badly slowing down. I just happen to like Chrome better. I know it’s like firefox.

Because there are times when you can do something with Firefox you can't do with Chrome and the other browsers being discussed, Eddge, Chrome, are Chrome-based browsers. I think it is a very good

Try using the media creation tool to do it. http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=691209

Preach it! I didn’t like it either when I had windows 7. I don’t have it on this system. I don’t intend to install it here. All the browsers like Chrome are like it. So, why would I want firefox

Hi, The actual announcement was sent to Win10 forum, although I did hint at that a while back (if I’m reading the list archives correctly in the midst of working on multiple NVDA pull

- Wait until Version 2004 is offered, or at least until another month goes by before trying to force update. In the meantime if you have not been updated to the latest version of Windows 10 App

Hi Group, I have my system set to automatically receive windows updates. I have no delays or any other qualifications for this. However, I am still stuck on windows 1903. Worse than

I used Firefox enough to generalize this problem. I don't think anyone's system is bad. -- Sean Email: seantolstoyevski@...

I use chrome myself, and still use waterfox classic. There are a few niggles with this but the classic interface is good and the classic way of doing things is more accessible.

Screen readers and Browsers are programs that do not require much CPU. Firefox is known as CPU and RAM friendly. It's not like the people here think. No matter how new and

I agree, and if you can't afford one of the latest, try x business or x lease. I am doing work for my uncle who has a 6th generation x lease system and while it has a few small niggles like it likes

When is the last time you tested Firefox? I don't use it much but earlier, I had more crashes and on the few times I've used updated Firefox, I haven't had crashes. Also, you can't assume that

I actually hate firefox. I use the latest what ever that is on windows 10 and it slows my system to a crawl. I'll use it for testing stuff, but I prefer brave. By the way I'm running windows 10 2004

No version of Firefox is compatible with NVDA than Chrome. It is also valid for Quantum. I really wanted to use Firefox. But just like your problems, crashes occurred. --

Then you need a newer more powerful computer so you can run Windows 7 or 10 or whatever you want to run. You can't run any version of Firefox later than 51.x with XP. Gene

Try it and see. Just because people generally report that a program doesn't crash doesn't mean you will have the same performance, because there are differences between systems, perhaps corruption,

Yes that is confirmed. I read something about it last night. I never took the update yet. There is an update to edge. Sent from Mail for Windows 10