In my opinion, a little common sense should have given you pause. I objected to unsupported disparagement but that didn't mean that I wanted disparaging comments regarding one person's alleged bad

Hi friends. I’m using e speak and don’t mind it.

I read most of your message and it is irrelevant to what is appropriate for this list. If a situation arises in the future where there is a question about a message I send regarding whether

Hi Don, On behalf of everyone, thank you :) We're glad it's working well for you. I'm here in the group if you ever need anything, and of course, Joseph and everyone else here are very helpful (and

Hi Dennis, The Master (Beta quality) builds are available from: http://www.nvaccess.org/files/nvda/snapshots/ There are also "next" builds there which are essentially alpha quality. Any of these can

I'm totally not seeing a lot of these messages, but I think it's because I killfiled Chris at some point a few months ago. Anyway, he writes in part: Finally, I called in one time not because of

I never said it was. What I said was, it was the same voice that was used by Google TTS back in Android 2.3 and below. I didn't mean to imply they were the same TTS engine the whole way around. In

 I've written Christopher Toth about this many many times, and never get any response, hince why I'm asking here. I don't plan to continue this thread, and all mods are welcome to lock this thread

Although it was created by Google, Pico is not the same as Google TTS. they are two different synthesizers with very different voices.

 Gene, You don't have to worry, as I won't give any opinions any longer. I see very strongly your side of the coin, and in your defense, I agree with most 90% of what you said, and normally

I don't have time to read your message now but I read the introduction and I'll make the following comments. I'll read the full message when I have more time but my comments are directed toward your

 You know Gene, that actually would be a good idea, and also maybe have it even when ran default to the native voice by default on the system. As, I gotta tell ya, bro, the voices now that come

It doesn't work withh nearly all the programs that NVDA does. but as with any screen-reader, there are times when it will do something better and times when it will do something worse when compared

 I dont even remember if SA had/has browse mode. It seems like it does, but, I can't recall for certain. Anyway, I think Gene really is dead spot on here. I'm neither really a fan of tabbing

 Thanks Gene, this link is very helpful, and is appreciated. I learned a bit by looking through it, which always is a good thing. Chris.

i also mean this feature for doing thelabeling of controls so both have gone by the way side and never were ever fixed no matter what serotek might want to say about it.

 How even did you all come up with the name CSaw anyway? I used to know, and I just can't recall for the life of me. I do remember thinking that the accronym was kind a creative, taht much, I will!

yes that is what i am refering to and Buddy i remember you did work at serotek i even talked to you for some tech issues i had been having; and lets say this even though serotek droped that feature it

I have long maintained that during installation, the NVDA installer should give the option to use the default voice on the computer instead of E-Speak. Many people don't give NVDA a proper trial

I don't know how you tried to fill out the fields using NVDA. Usually, with experimentation, you can figure out what information goes with what field and have it read if it isn't. You or others may