Date   

Re: Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

Chris Mullins
 

Hi Robert
I had the same issue, below is a précis of the steps to add/remove exclusions to defender.

To add an exclusion toWindows Defender.

1. Open the Windows Defender Security Center app, and activate the Virus & threat protection icon.

2. activate the Virus & threat protection settings link.

3. activate the Add or remove exclusions link under the Exclusion ssection.

4. activate the Add an exclusion plus button, and go to step 5 (file), step 6(folder), step 7 (file type), or step 8 (process) below depending on the type of exclusion you want to add.

5. To Add a File Exclusion to Windows Defender

Note: This option is to add a specific file as an exclusion to no longer be scanned by Windows Defender.
A) activate File under Add an exclusion.
B) Navigate to and select a file you want to exclude, activate Open, and go to step 9 below.

6. To Add a Folder Exclusion to Windows Defender
Note:This option is to add a folder as an exclusion to no longer have the folder and the files in the folder scanned by Windows Defender.
A) activate Folder under Add an exclusion.
B) Navigate to and select a folder you want to exclude, activate Select folder, and go to step 9 below.

7. To Add a File Type Exclusion to Windows Defender
Note: This option is to add a file extension as an exclusion to no longer have all files with that file type scanned by Windows Defender.
A) activate File type under Add an exclusion. (see screenshot below step 4)
B) Enter a file extension you want to exclude, activate Add, and go to step 9 below.

8. To Add a Process Exclusion to Windows Defender
Note: This option is to add a process as an exclusion to no longer have any file associated with it scanned by Windows Defender.
A) activate Process under Add an exclusion.
B) Enter a process name you want to exclude, activate Add, and go to step 9 below.

9. activate Yes when prompted by UAC to approve.

10. Repeat step 4 above if you would like to add another exclusion to Windows Defender.

11. When finished, you can close Settings.


To remove an exclusion from Windows Defender

Repeat steps 1 to 3 as in 'To add an exclusion...' above.

4. select an added exclusion that you want to remove, and activate its Remove button.

5. activate Yes when prompted by UAC to approve.

6. Repeat step 4 above if you would like to remove another exclusion.

7. When finished, you can close Settings.


HTH
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Robert Mendoza
Sent: 21 February 2018 23:19
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: [nvda] Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

Early this morning when I am about to run the Virtual recorder and haven't use it for awhile the Windows Defender of my Windows 10 detected that there is a virus that's need to be scanned offline. not sure what happened but before the same program has been used with no problem for couple of months ago. Any thought or experience for this. Thanks.
--

Robert Mendoza


Re: Firefox ESR

 

Well skype7 works for me right now.

And when it dies, I just won't use skype anymore I suppose.

With firefox, I will never download it ever again.

Waterfox will handle itself till june as it is and after that aparently it will continue as its own opensource mozilla port aparently.

Even if it doesn't one hopes that it stays securely updated or at least is not deleted since I will be using it from now on.

June this year is when all old firefox extentions will die  with the new firefox but who knows.

To be honest, I hardly use skype.

I use it for the nvda group, and if push comes to shove, I can get out of nvda group.

Calling is its own problem.

I guess my next thing will to get an iphone or something and run things off whats app maybe skype but well.

On 22/02/2018 11:04 p.m., Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io wrote:
I think the only reason I'd update firefox now is if the new version handled pages  in the future better, or had a feature I needed to have.
I'm not saying never, but I do feel that we need to be a little less gung ho at accepting every update offered to us, since we are a minority user group, often rough edges for many can spell unusability for us, and for those using the system for earning a living this is bad news.
Take the recent Skype thread as a for instance. all the sysadmins went ahead and many blind users were at a  a stroke unable to do their work.
That kind of  inaccessibility as with firefox 57 is, in my view unacceptable at any level by any company.
It simply should have been part of routine testing.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Antony Stone" <antony.stone@nvda.open.source.it>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


What software does not run in such an environment?

I can only think of machines without a network connection, and that's hardly
useful these days (secure, agreed, but what can they do?).


Antony.

On Thursday 22 February 2018 at 00:39:12, Gene wrote:

Not all software.  All software that you use in an environment where it
comes into contact with possibly malicious content such as browsers.
There is lots of software that you don't need to upgrade.

Gene
----- Original Message -----

From: Antony Stone
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:11 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


"ESR" means Extended Support Release.

Every now and then, a Firefox release is labeled as ESR, and it means they
promise to support it for longer than the other in-between releases.

There is no reason to switch from a standard release to an ESR release
unless:

a) you like always running the latest release, and the ESR release is the
latest one

or

b) you are currently running a no-longer-supported release, you don't want
to update to the latest release, but there's an ESR release somewhere in
between which you are happy with.

Basically, do not run unsupported software.  If security vulnerabilities
are discovered, you may well run into problems and they will be nobody
else's fault.

So, either run a recent (supported) standard version, or run an ESR version
(which may be older, but has support for longer), but either way, update
before that version becomes unsupported.

The above is true for all software, not just Firefox.  Not all projects
have ESR versions, but many do - some are known as LTR - Long Term
Release.


Antony.

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 23:58:42, Andrea Sherry wrote:
What is this? Is it necessary to use instead of regular Firefox?

Andrea
--
+++ Divide By Cucumber Error.  Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++

                                                  Please reply to the list;
                                                        please *don't* CC me.





Re: OEClassic gets an update fixing more accessibility issues

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

Who said that?
I think the point was I just did in google
"oeclassic download"
And up came the address and that was it. No not using it yet, but may well do if it looks like it will suit.
The windows 10 offering is surely a joke written by the tea boy.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karim Lakhani" <karim.lakhani@shaw.ca>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:40 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] OEClassic gets an update fixing more accessibility issues


Are you telling me to unsubscribe from this list?
I'll just use Google as my support?
The reason I ask questions here is because if another blind person has the
URL, that means they may be using the software, and I will give it a shot.
In my experience, TB, OEclassic, are not as good as outlook.
I've been using outlook 2003 and it's hard to change a goat.
I'm not sure the point you are trying to make, don't ask questions on the
list?
I'm still having a hell of a time with TB and I have looked at help and
sometimes getting a prospective from a blind person can be really helpful.
If people don't want questions on a tech list for the bind please state
that in a list of rules, such as don't ask questions until you have made
sure to exhaust, all resources before asking a question on this list?
A clarification by someone wood be appreciated.
Have a great day!



$$$$$$
EMAIL:karim.lakhani@shaw.ca
$$$$
SKYPE: goldenace4
$$$
Your reputation is in the hands of others. That's what a
reputation is. You can't control that. The only thing you
can control is your character.
- Wayne Walter Dyer (1940-)



-----Original Message-----
From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Brian's
Mail list account via Groups.Io
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:45 AM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] OEClassic gets an update fixing more accessibility
issues


https://www.oeclassic.com/download


Strange that innit?
Simply search for these things on Google its faster than asking here!

Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karim Lakhani" <karim.lakhani@shaw.ca>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] OEClassic gets an update fixing more accessibility
issues


where do we find OE classic?



$$$$$$
EMAIL:karim.lakhani@shaw.ca
$$$$
SKYPE: goldenace4
$$$
Your reputation is in the hands of others. That's what a reputation
is. You can't control that. The only thing you can control is your
character.
- Wayne Walter Dyer (1940-)



-----Original Message-----
From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of
Brice Mijares
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 7:17 AM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] OEClassic gets an update fixing more accessibility
issues

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

On 2/20/2018 5:44 AM, Gene wrote:
This is a different program.?? It's OE Classic.?? You are talking
about the original Outlook express.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Brice Mijares <mailto:bricemijares@att.net>
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 7:39 AM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] OEClassic gets an update fixing more
accessibility issues

Didn't I hear when windows 10 has a major update it removes OE?

On 2/20/2018 5:05 AM, Robert Kingett wrote:
> I did some web crawling. The pro version has identities, so not
sure if > that is something you want, but I would comb through all
of their news > section <https://www.oeclassic.com/news> to see what
features have been > added. The free version is on 27 now. 28, the
more accessible version, > will be free when the pro version shoots
up to 29. I can wait. No big > deal for me, but I think it is a one
time payment? And you get upgrades > for life? I'll have to look at
the
website again though.
>











Re: Firefox ESR

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

I think the only reason I'd update firefox now is if the new version handled pages in the future better, or had a feature I needed to have.
I'm not saying never, but I do feel that we need to be a little less gung ho at accepting every update offered to us, since we are a minority user group, often rough edges for many can spell unusability for us, and for those using the system for earning a living this is bad news.
Take the recent Skype thread as a for instance. all the sysadmins went ahead and many blind users were at a a stroke unable to do their work.
That kind of inaccessibility as with firefox 57 is, in my view unacceptable at any level by any company.
It simply should have been part of routine testing.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Antony Stone" <antony.stone@nvda.open.source.it>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


What software does not run in such an environment?

I can only think of machines without a network connection, and that's hardly
useful these days (secure, agreed, but what can they do?).


Antony.

On Thursday 22 February 2018 at 00:39:12, Gene wrote:

Not all software. All software that you use in an environment where it
comes into contact with possibly malicious content such as browsers.
There is lots of software that you don't need to upgrade.

Gene
----- Original Message -----

From: Antony Stone
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:11 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


"ESR" means Extended Support Release.

Every now and then, a Firefox release is labeled as ESR, and it means they
promise to support it for longer than the other in-between releases.

There is no reason to switch from a standard release to an ESR release
unless:

a) you like always running the latest release, and the ESR release is the
latest one

or

b) you are currently running a no-longer-supported release, you don't want
to update to the latest release, but there's an ESR release somewhere in
between which you are happy with.

Basically, do not run unsupported software. If security vulnerabilities
are discovered, you may well run into problems and they will be nobody
else's fault.

So, either run a recent (supported) standard version, or run an ESR version
(which may be older, but has support for longer), but either way, update
before that version becomes unsupported.

The above is true for all software, not just Firefox. Not all projects
have ESR versions, but many do - some are known as LTR - Long Term
Release.


Antony.

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 23:58:42, Andrea Sherry wrote:
What is this? Is it necessary to use instead of regular Firefox?

Andrea
--
+++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++

Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.


Re: Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

 

Well I have hung on to my sanity, but I know people that have snapped.

They exclude their program files, user files, download files and windows folders in fact all their drives from the virus software because they just can't handle it anymore.

On 22/02/2018 10:44 p.m., Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io wrote:
I tend to just tell it to ignore it if things happen like this. In msse you can do this.
Obviously you need to be sure of the origin of the software.

it does the same to passview some software I use to get back peoples forgotten email client passwords too.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lenron" <lenron93@gmail.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder


stupid anti virus crap always breaking programs.

On 2/22/18, Robert Mendoza <lowvisiontek@gmail.com> wrote:
Now even my backup in my flash drive has been removed. Does anyone here
the link to download the installer for Virtual Recorder. I appreciate
your response.

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 3:03 PM, Robert Mendoza wrote:
I will give it a try once again. Thanks, Shaun!

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 11:07 AM, Shaun Everiss wrote:
Hmph its just windows defender targeting the blind again.

Programs your av detects is ok suddenly are problems, just exclude
that folder, you may have to reinstall virtual recorder.




On 22/02/2018 12:19 p.m., Robert Mendoza wrote:
Early this morning when I am about to run the Virtual recorder and
haven't use it for awhile the Windows Defender of my Windows 10
detected that there is a virus that's need to be scanned offline.
not sure what happened but before the same program has been used
with no problem for couple of months ago. Any thought or experience
for this. Thanks.








--
Lenron Brown
Cell: 985-271-2832
Skype: ron.brown762





Re: virtual recorder

 

Just reformat and it will be gone.

Its why I am against all this software bundling.

A good reformat fixes everything if there is a problem a reformat will fix it.

It just really angers me the user that this bundling has to yhappen at all.

I mean if it wasn't for all this bundling and some extra monitering with pro versions and slowing things down I'd probably buy the entire kit.

On 22/02/2018 10:42 p.m., Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io wrote:
Yes I know. I'm not as power user as you are, but I have an xp machine upstairs which accidentally got avast on it. I got a sighted person to uninstall it, but now there are a few core services still running which cannot be removed without, according to my research, using safe mode and a special remover from avast.

I'm sure all this seemed like a good idea to the vendors, but to the end user they are a pain. on our studio windows 7 machine avast seems to have been gotten rid of but there are still one or too bits that cannot be deleted claiming the partition that they refer to is in use but cannot be accessed from windows. How do I really know if avast is good or has it seated some bits of itself out of sight and is now sending data back? I'm not about to reformat that would be both impossible and stop the paper being published for a couple of weeks.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shaun Everiss" <sm.everiss@gmail.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 8:31 AM
Subject: [nvda] virtual recorder


Hi.

http://opopanax.net/dl is where all of the virtual recorder is.

Recently I have come to the conclusion that if it wasn't for ransomware, I think I'd actually go without antivirus, a firewall or any security software at all.

It seems that all a lot of this stuff does is target things that were working fine and screw them over.

The blind are targeted a lot.

Bgt excluded since that and how its written is just something antiviruses don't like.

The only way to fix the issue is exclude parts of your hard drive.

I have half a mind to just exclude all my drives and take my chances.

I do this to a few folders in my backup drives but to be honest I do wander at how security software has degraded not just in accessibility but functionality as well.

In the old days I used to use zone alarm and a few other firewalls.

Lets see, load 1, and suddenly the antivirus software says its bad, part of it is deleted, the system is screwed.

A reformat fixes it but now I need to find another.

The other certainly works, blocking everything including changed ips and remote shares which may have been fine if it was not inaccessible, and if I had a static ip it would be fine but I don't have one of those.

So printers drives etc.

I simply abandoned sharing and internal remoting all together.

Msse doesn't seem to be that bad but I can see I am going to have to restructure bits of my hard drive.

Firstly, directories for games, office apps, etc, and have those excluded, then an unprocessed folder in my root just so I can find out what exactly is not a virus when something is caught.

That may be a blessing as I have to structure my drives which I don't do.

On the other hand it takes time.

I am unsure about usb drives I guess you have to have apps in portable apps on e f g etc and exclude that and hope like hell nothing screws up.

And while this promotes best practice, it certainly stops me trying to get something better than crappy msse/defender.

If the crappy antivirus and malware software has so much false alarms what will a really good bit of software do.

No, I know what that did, I trialed on the network something and it decided that windows was a virus.

2 weeks later and 3 reformats for the 3 computers and reinstalling of things and either buying, or trying to get back lost licences to products I allready own, I went online to the site I got the programs to complain, and they had up and left.

And were nowhere on the net at all.







Re: espeak volume quite low

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

Assuming the other advice has been followed in this thread, then I'm at a bit of a loss as its plenty loud enough. Not as loud as maybe some voices in other synths, like Serena for example but those voices are very compressed and have few dynamics at all, therefore their average loudness sounds more, much like the adverts in tv programs for the same reason.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Covici" <covici@ccs.covici.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] espeak volume quite low


I am using Max as the variant. Volume is a lot lower than normal
stuff.

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:48:21 -0500,
zahra wrote:

hi.
do you use espeak bundled with nvda or
do you use espeak sapi5?
if you use espeak of sapi5, it depend on the valume of your choice in
control panel, valume control.
if you use espeak which is installed by default with nvda, i did not
try other synthesizer,
but for me the valume is loud and i select 60 or 70 for its valume.
also, it depend on the voice that you selected.
which variant are you using?

On 2/21/18, John Covici <covici@ccs.covici.com> wrote:
Hi. I am noticing that espeak has quite alower volume than other
system sounds, or listening to a video or anything else, even though
the volume is set at 100% in voice settings. How can I fix?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?

John Covici wb2una
covici@ccs.covici.com




--
By God,
were I given all the seven heavens
with all they contain
in order that
I may disobey God
by depriving an ant
from the husk of a grain of barley,
I would not do it.
imam ali


--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?

John Covici wb2una
covici@ccs.covici.com


Re: Firefox ESR

 

i have sometimes slowness in 52.6 which i tested and think its because
of spectre bug fix.
i read that fixing spectre makes slowness in some programs, but did
not read anything about effect of fixing spectre in firefox until now.

On 2/22/18, Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io
<bglists=blueyonder.co.uk@groups.io> wrote:
My only moans ar the download dialogue is not read and you cannot have
navigational sounds any more.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "JM Casey" <crystallogic@ca.inter.net>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:11 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


This brings me to the question – what sort of issues are users of Firefox 58

and NVDA experiencing? I know that other major screen-reader does not work
with any of the new FF versions, but nVDA does – seemingly quite well in
fact.







From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: February 21, 2018 7:56 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



This isn't just something Mozilla does every now and then. Extended Support

releases may be used by anyone but they are intended for businesses and
other institutions that don't want the program to be upgraded frequently.
The extended support release receives all security updates but the program
itself doesn't upgrade for one year after release.



The next ESR release will be this summer sometime in June, as I recall.



Because of all the changes being made in firefox now that may impair
performance for blind users and interfere with accessibility of some web
sites, those who don't want to use the new versions are instructed to use
the current ESR version which is version 52 of the program and was released

before these changes took place. Those who want to try the new versions, in

particular those who want to try new versions and send feedback regarding
problems and progress are encouraged to try the new versions as they are
released.



Gene

----- Original Message -----

From: Andrea Sherry <mailto:sherryan@wideband.net.au>

Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:40 PM

To: nvda@nvda.groups.io

Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



Thanks for that.

Andrea


On 22/02/2018 10:11 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
"ESR" means Extended Support Release.

Every now and then, a Firefox release is labeled as ESR, and it means
they
promise to support it for longer than the other in-between releases.

There is no reason to switch from a standard release to an ESR release
unless:

a) you like always running the latest release, and the ESR release is the
latest one

or

b) you are currently running a no-longer-supported release, you don't want

to
update to the latest release, but there's an ESR release somewhere in
between
which you are happy with.

Basically, do not run unsupported software. If security vulnerabilities
are
discovered, you may well run into problems and they will be nobody else's
fault.

So, either run a recent (supported) standard version, or run an ESR
version
(which may be older, but has support for longer), but either way, update
before that version becomes unsupported.

The above is true for all software, not just Firefox. Not all projects
have
ESR versions, but many do - some are known as LTR - Long Term Release.


Antony.

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 23:58:42, Andrea Sherry wrote:

What is this? Is it necessary to use instead of regular Firefox?

Andrea
--
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start
from now and make a brand new ending." - Carl Brad










--
By God,
were I given all the seven heavens
with all they contain
in order that
I may disobey God
by depriving an ant
from the husk of a grain of barley,
I would not do it.
imam ali


Re: Firefox ESR

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

My only moans ar the download dialogue is not read and you cannot have navigational sounds any more.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "JM Casey" <crystallogic@ca.inter.net>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:11 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


This brings me to the question – what sort of issues are users of Firefox 58 and NVDA experiencing? I know that other major screen-reader does not work with any of the new FF versions, but nVDA does – seemingly quite well in fact.







From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: February 21, 2018 7:56 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



This isn't just something Mozilla does every now and then. Extended Support releases may be used by anyone but they are intended for businesses and other institutions that don't want the program to be upgraded frequently. The extended support release receives all security updates but the program itself doesn't upgrade for one year after release.



The next ESR release will be this summer sometime in June, as I recall.



Because of all the changes being made in firefox now that may impair performance for blind users and interfere with accessibility of some web sites, those who don't want to use the new versions are instructed to use the current ESR version which is version 52 of the program and was released before these changes took place. Those who want to try the new versions, in particular those who want to try new versions and send feedback regarding problems and progress are encouraged to try the new versions as they are released.



Gene

----- Original Message -----

From: Andrea Sherry <mailto:sherryan@wideband.net.au>

Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:40 PM

To: nvda@nvda.groups.io

Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



Thanks for that.

Andrea


On 22/02/2018 10:11 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
"ESR" means Extended Support Release.

Every now and then, a Firefox release is labeled as ESR, and it means they
promise to support it for longer than the other in-between releases.

There is no reason to switch from a standard release to an ESR release unless:

a) you like always running the latest release, and the ESR release is the
latest one

or

b) you are currently running a no-longer-supported release, you don't want to
update to the latest release, but there's an ESR release somewhere in between
which you are happy with.

Basically, do not run unsupported software. If security vulnerabilities are
discovered, you may well run into problems and they will be nobody else's
fault.

So, either run a recent (supported) standard version, or run an ESR version
(which may be older, but has support for longer), but either way, update
before that version becomes unsupported.

The above is true for all software, not just Firefox. Not all projects have
ESR versions, but many do - some are known as LTR - Long Term Release.


Antony.

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 23:58:42, Andrea Sherry wrote:

What is this? Is it necessary to use instead of regular Firefox?

Andrea
--
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start
from now and make a brand new ending." - Carl Brad


Re: Bug in espeak ng used in NVDA Next

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

I'm still using the old Espeak in the speech palyer in espeak as the weird ways some words are said in ng is still a problem.
brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Quentin Christensen" <quentin@nvaccess.org>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:32 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Bug in espeak ng used in NVDA Next


Hi Simon,

What version of eSpeak-NG are you using? Looking at:
https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/releases indicates that the latest
version is 1.49.2, which we updated to prior to NVDA 2017.4.

Having said that, I know there are still issues with eSpeak, some of which
are tracked on our issue tracker, and some on eSpeak-NG's here:
https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues

Kind regards

Quentin.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Simon Eigeldinger <simon.eigeldinger@vol.at
wrote:
Hi all,

The currently used espeak ng has a bug in the german language.
The bug has been fixed and espeak ng should be updated to latest master.
haven't opened a ticket yet because i thought i'll not make to much
noise about it.
though i can open a ticket as well if the devs prefer that.

Greetings and thanks,
Simon



---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus





--
Quentin Christensen
Training and Support Manager

Official NVDA Training modules and expert certification now available:
http://www.nvaccess.org/shop/

www.nvaccess.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
Twitter: @NVAccess


Re: Firefox ESR

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

Yes but its the esr which the last update has slowed down for staarting for some reason.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "zahra" <nasrinkhaksar3@gmail.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR


esr is extended support release.
for example: firefox 52esr recieves security updates of firefox 52 until 61.
but regular versions be updated in at least 6weeks and maybe some
people dont want to miss previous features or dont like new features
and changes of updates.

On 2/22/18, JM Casey <crystallogic@ca.inter.net> wrote:
This brings me to the question – what sort of issues are users of Firefox 58
and NVDA experiencing? I know that other major screen-reader does not work
with any of the new FF versions, but nVDA does – seemingly quite well in
fact.







From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: February 21, 2018 7:56 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



This isn't just something Mozilla does every now and then. Extended Support
releases may be used by anyone but they are intended for businesses and
other institutions that don't want the program to be upgraded frequently.
The extended support release receives all security updates but the program
itself doesn't upgrade for one year after release.



The next ESR release will be this summer sometime in June, as I recall.



Because of all the changes being made in firefox now that may impair
performance for blind users and interfere with accessibility of some web
sites, those who don't want to use the new versions are instructed to use
the current ESR version which is version 52 of the program and was released
before these changes took place. Those who want to try the new versions, in
particular those who want to try new versions and send feedback regarding
problems and progress are encouraged to try the new versions as they are
released.



Gene

----- Original Message -----

From: Andrea Sherry <mailto:sherryan@wideband.net.au>

Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:40 PM

To: nvda@nvda.groups.io

Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



Thanks for that.

Andrea


On 22/02/2018 10:11 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
"ESR" means Extended Support Release.

Every now and then, a Firefox release is labeled as ESR, and it means
they
promise to support it for longer than the other in-between releases.

There is no reason to switch from a standard release to an ESR release
unless:

a) you like always running the latest release, and the ESR release is the
latest one

or

b) you are currently running a no-longer-supported release, you don't want
to
update to the latest release, but there's an ESR release somewhere in
between
which you are happy with.

Basically, do not run unsupported software. If security vulnerabilities
are
discovered, you may well run into problems and they will be nobody else's
fault.

So, either run a recent (supported) standard version, or run an ESR
version
(which may be older, but has support for longer), but either way, update
before that version becomes unsupported.

The above is true for all software, not just Firefox. Not all projects
have
ESR versions, but many do - some are known as LTR - Long Term Release.


Antony.

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 23:58:42, Andrea Sherry wrote:

What is this? Is it necessary to use instead of regular Firefox?

Andrea
--
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start
from now and make a brand new ending." - Carl Brad






--
By God,
were I given all the seven heavens
with all they contain
in order that
I may disobey God
by depriving an ant
from the husk of a grain of barley,
I would not do it.
imam ali


Re: Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

I tend to just tell it to ignore it if things happen like this. In msse you can do this.
Obviously you need to be sure of the origin of the software.

it does the same to passview some software I use to get back peoples forgotten email client passwords too.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lenron" <lenron93@gmail.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder


stupid anti virus crap always breaking programs.

On 2/22/18, Robert Mendoza <lowvisiontek@gmail.com> wrote:
Now even my backup in my flash drive has been removed. Does anyone here
the link to download the installer for Virtual Recorder. I appreciate
your response.

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 3:03 PM, Robert Mendoza wrote:
I will give it a try once again. Thanks, Shaun!

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 11:07 AM, Shaun Everiss wrote:
Hmph its just windows defender targeting the blind again.

Programs your av detects is ok suddenly are problems, just exclude
that folder, you may have to reinstall virtual recorder.




On 22/02/2018 12:19 p.m., Robert Mendoza wrote:
Early this morning when I am about to run the Virtual recorder and
haven't use it for awhile the Windows Defender of my Windows 10
detected that there is a virus that's need to be scanned offline.
not sure what happened but before the same program has been used
with no problem for couple of months ago. Any thought or experience
for this. Thanks.








--
Lenron Brown
Cell: 985-271-2832
Skype: ron.brown762


Re: virtual recorder

Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
 

Yes I know. I'm not as power user as you are, but I have an xp machine upstairs which accidentally got avast on it. I got a sighted person to uninstall it, but now there are a few core services still running which cannot be removed without, according to my research, using safe mode and a special remover from avast.

I'm sure all this seemed like a good idea to the vendors, but to the end user they are a pain. on our studio windows 7 machine avast seems to have been gotten rid of but there are still one or too bits that cannot be deleted claiming the partition that they refer to is in use but cannot be accessed from windows. How do I really know if avast is good or has it seated some bits of itself out of sight and is now sending data back? I'm not about to reformat that would be both impossible and stop the paper being published for a couple of weeks.
Brian

bglists@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent via blueyonder.
Please address personal email to:-
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name field.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaun Everiss" <sm.everiss@gmail.com>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 8:31 AM
Subject: [nvda] virtual recorder


Hi.

http://opopanax.net/dl is where all of the virtual recorder is.

Recently I have come to the conclusion that if it wasn't for ransomware, I think I'd actually go without antivirus, a firewall or any security software at all.

It seems that all a lot of this stuff does is target things that were working fine and screw them over.

The blind are targeted a lot.

Bgt excluded since that and how its written is just something antiviruses don't like.

The only way to fix the issue is exclude parts of your hard drive.

I have half a mind to just exclude all my drives and take my chances.

I do this to a few folders in my backup drives but to be honest I do wander at how security software has degraded not just in accessibility but functionality as well.

In the old days I used to use zone alarm and a few other firewalls.

Lets see, load 1, and suddenly the antivirus software says its bad, part of it is deleted, the system is screwed.

A reformat fixes it but now I need to find another.

The other certainly works, blocking everything including changed ips and remote shares which may have been fine if it was not inaccessible, and if I had a static ip it would be fine but I don't have one of those.

So printers drives etc.

I simply abandoned sharing and internal remoting all together.

Msse doesn't seem to be that bad but I can see I am going to have to restructure bits of my hard drive.

Firstly, directories for games, office apps, etc, and have those excluded, then an unprocessed folder in my root just so I can find out what exactly is not a virus when something is caught.

That may be a blessing as I have to structure my drives which I don't do.

On the other hand it takes time.

I am unsure about usb drives I guess you have to have apps in portable apps on e f g etc and exclude that and hope like hell nothing screws up.

And while this promotes best practice, it certainly stops me trying to get something better than crappy msse/defender.

If the crappy antivirus and malware software has so much false alarms what will a really good bit of software do.

No, I know what that did, I trialed on the network something and it decided that windows was a virus.

2 weeks later and 3 reformats for the 3 computers and reinstalling of things and either buying, or trying to get back lost licences to products I allready own, I went online to the site I got the programs to complain, and they had up and left.

And were nowhere on the net at all.




virtual recorder

 

Hi.

http://opopanax.net/dl is where all of the virtual recorder is.

Recently I have come to the conclusion that if it wasn't for ransomware, I think I'd actually go without antivirus, a firewall or any security software at all.

It seems that all a lot of this stuff does is target things that were working fine and screw them over.

The blind are targeted a lot.

Bgt excluded since that and how its written is just something antiviruses don't like.

The only way to fix the issue is exclude parts of your hard drive.

I have half a mind to just exclude all my drives and take my chances.

I do this to a few folders in my backup drives but to be honest I do wander at how security software has degraded not just in accessibility but functionality as well.

In the old days I used to use zone alarm and a few other firewalls.

Lets see, load 1, and suddenly the antivirus software says its bad, part of it is deleted, the system is screwed.

A reformat fixes it but now I need to find another.

The other certainly works, blocking everything including changed ips and remote shares which may have been fine if it was not inaccessible, and if I had a static ip it would be fine but I don't have one of those.

So printers drives etc.

I simply abandoned sharing and internal remoting all together.

Msse doesn't seem to be that bad but I can see I am going to have to restructure bits of my hard drive.

Firstly, directories for games, office apps, etc, and have those excluded, then an unprocessed folder in my root just so I can find out what exactly is not a virus when something is caught.

That may be a blessing as I have to structure my drives which I don't do.

On the other hand it takes time.

I am unsure about usb drives I guess you have to have apps in portable apps on e f g etc and exclude that and hope like hell nothing screws up.

And while this promotes best practice, it certainly stops me trying to get something better than crappy msse/defender.

If the crappy antivirus and malware software has so much false alarms what will a really good bit of software do.

No, I know what that did, I trialed on the network something and it decided that windows was a virus.

2 weeks later and 3 reformats for the 3 computers and reinstalling of things and either buying, or trying to get back lost licences to products I allready own, I went online to the site I got the programs to complain, and they had up and left.

And were nowhere on the net at all.


Re: Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

Lenron
 

stupid anti virus crap always breaking programs.

On 2/22/18, Robert Mendoza <lowvisiontek@gmail.com> wrote:
Now even my backup in my flash drive has been removed. Does anyone here
the link to download the installer for Virtual Recorder. I appreciate
your response.

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 3:03 PM, Robert Mendoza wrote:
I will give it a try once again. Thanks, Shaun!

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 11:07 AM, Shaun Everiss wrote:
Hmph its just windows defender targeting the blind again.

Programs your av detects is ok suddenly are problems, just exclude
that folder, you may have to reinstall virtual recorder.




On 22/02/2018 12:19 p.m., Robert Mendoza wrote:
Early this morning when I am about to run the Virtual recorder and
haven't use it for awhile the Windows Defender of my Windows 10
detected that there is a virus that's need to be scanned offline.
not sure what happened but before the same program has been used
with no problem for couple of months ago. Any thought or experience
for this. Thanks.







--
Lenron Brown
Cell: 985-271-2832
Skype: ron.brown762


Re: Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

Robert Mendoza
 

Now even my backup in my flash drive has been removed. Does anyone here the link to download the installer for Virtual Recorder. I appreciate your response.

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 3:03 PM, Robert Mendoza wrote:
I will give it a try once again. Thanks, Shaun!

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 11:07 AM, Shaun Everiss wrote:
Hmph its just windows defender targeting the blind again.

Programs your av detects is ok suddenly are problems, just exclude that folder, you may have to reinstall virtual recorder.




On 22/02/2018 12:19 p.m., Robert Mendoza wrote:
Early this morning when I am about to run the Virtual recorder and haven't use it for awhile the Windows Defender of my Windows 10 detected that there is a virus that's need to be scanned offline. not sure what happened but before the same program has been used with no problem for couple of months ago. Any thought or experience for this. Thanks.




Re: Windows 10 detected of virus in Virtual Recorder

Robert Mendoza
 

I will give it a try once again. Thanks, Shaun!

Robert Mendoza

On 2/22/2018 11:07 AM, Shaun Everiss wrote:
Hmph its just windows defender targeting the blind again.

Programs your av detects is ok suddenly are problems, just exclude that folder, you may have to reinstall virtual recorder.




On 22/02/2018 12:19 p.m., Robert Mendoza wrote:
Early this morning when I am about to run the Virtual recorder and haven't use it for awhile the Windows Defender of my Windows 10 detected that there is a virus that's need to be scanned offline. not sure what happened but before the same program has been used with no problem for couple of months ago. Any thought or experience for this. Thanks.


Re: quickbooks

Quentin Christensen
 

Hi John,

Sorry to hear that.  If you do try it again, it would be great if you could document any issues you encounter on our issue tracker: https://github.com/nvaccess/nvda/issues as then we will know where we stand when looking at it afresh.

Kind regards

Quentin.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, John Covici <covici@...> wrote:
OK, thanks.  I did try it originally and it seemed pretty lame.

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:25:34 -0500,
Quentin Christensen wrote:
>
> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> [2  <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> Hi John,
>
> The short answer would seem to be that no, there doesn't appear to have been any updates. The add-on is still available from the add-ons page, however as it was never listed as "stable", you need to go to the "addons under development"
> link. The direct link for the addon is: https://addons.nvda-project.org/addons/quickBooks2014.en.html
>
> I must admit, I haven't tried Quickbooks lately, so I am not sure how complete or incomplete it is, or whether newer versions of Quickbooks have changed anything.
>
> So, if you do try it, do please let us know how it goes.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Quentin.
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:22 AM, John Covici <covici@...> wrote:
>
>  Hi. A while ago there was a quickbooks addon, but it never seemed to
>  go anywhere -- I was just wondering if there has been any development
>  over the last year or two in the addin.
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  --
>  Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
>  How do
>  you spend it?
>
>  John Covici wb2una
covici@...
>
> --
> Quentin Christensen
> Training and Support Manager
>
> Official NVDA Training modules and expert certification now available: http://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
>
> www.nvaccess.org
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
> Twitter: @NVAccess
>

--
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici wb2una
         covici@...






--
Quentin Christensen
Training and Support Manager

Official NVDA Training modules and expert certification now available: http://www.nvaccess.org/shop/

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess 
Twitter: @NVAccess 


Re: quickbooks

John Covici
 

OK, thanks. I did try it originally and it seemed pretty lame.

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:25:34 -0500,
Quentin Christensen wrote:

[1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
[2 <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
Hi John,

The short answer would seem to be that no, there doesn't appear to have been any updates. The add-on is still available from the add-ons page, however as it was never listed as "stable", you need to go to the "addons under development"
link. The direct link for the addon is: https://addons.nvda-project.org/addons/quickBooks2014.en.html

I must admit, I haven't tried Quickbooks lately, so I am not sure how complete or incomplete it is, or whether newer versions of Quickbooks have changed anything.

So, if you do try it, do please let us know how it goes.

Kind regards

Quentin.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:22 AM, John Covici <covici@ccs.covici.com> wrote:

Hi. A while ago there was a quickbooks addon, but it never seemed to
go anywhere -- I was just wondering if there has been any development
over the last year or two in the addin.

Thanks.

--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?

John Covici wb2una
covici@ccs.covici.com

--
Quentin Christensen
Training and Support Manager

Official NVDA Training modules and expert certification now available: http://www.nvaccess.org/shop/

www.nvaccess.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
Twitter: @NVAccess
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?

John Covici wb2una
covici@ccs.covici.com


Re: Firefox ESR

 

esr is extended support release.
for example: firefox 52esr recieves security updates of firefox 52 until 61.
but regular versions be updated in at least 6weeks and maybe some
people dont want to miss previous features or dont like new features
and changes of updates.

On 2/22/18, JM Casey <crystallogic@ca.inter.net> wrote:
This brings me to the question – what sort of issues are users of Firefox 58
and NVDA experiencing? I know that other major screen-reader does not work
with any of the new FF versions, but nVDA does – seemingly quite well in
fact.







From: nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: February 21, 2018 7:56 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



This isn't just something Mozilla does every now and then. Extended Support
releases may be used by anyone but they are intended for businesses and
other institutions that don't want the program to be upgraded frequently.
The extended support release receives all security updates but the program
itself doesn't upgrade for one year after release.



The next ESR release will be this summer sometime in June, as I recall.



Because of all the changes being made in firefox now that may impair
performance for blind users and interfere with accessibility of some web
sites, those who don't want to use the new versions are instructed to use
the current ESR version which is version 52 of the program and was released
before these changes took place. Those who want to try the new versions, in
particular those who want to try new versions and send feedback regarding
problems and progress are encouraged to try the new versions as they are
released.



Gene

----- Original Message -----

From: Andrea Sherry <mailto:sherryan@wideband.net.au>

Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:40 PM

To: nvda@nvda.groups.io

Subject: Re: [nvda] Firefox ESR



Thanks for that.

Andrea


On 22/02/2018 10:11 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
"ESR" means Extended Support Release.

Every now and then, a Firefox release is labeled as ESR, and it means
they
promise to support it for longer than the other in-between releases.

There is no reason to switch from a standard release to an ESR release
unless:

a) you like always running the latest release, and the ESR release is the
latest one

or

b) you are currently running a no-longer-supported release, you don't want
to
update to the latest release, but there's an ESR release somewhere in
between
which you are happy with.

Basically, do not run unsupported software. If security vulnerabilities
are
discovered, you may well run into problems and they will be nobody else's
fault.

So, either run a recent (supported) standard version, or run an ESR
version
(which may be older, but has support for longer), but either way, update
before that version becomes unsupported.

The above is true for all software, not just Firefox. Not all projects
have
ESR versions, but many do - some are known as LTR - Long Term Release.


Antony.

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 23:58:42, Andrea Sherry wrote:

What is this? Is it necessary to use instead of regular Firefox?

Andrea
--
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start
from now and make a brand new ending." - Carl Brad





--
By God,
were I given all the seven heavens
with all they contain
in order that
I may disobey God
by depriving an ant
from the husk of a grain of barley,
I would not do it.
imam ali