Date   
Re: backing up thunderbird

Curtis Delzer
 

I use Becky! mail, it does and I can have all my configurations, filters,
folders structure, automatically backed up every night using open drive.
I had to restore, re-claiming all 29000 or messages without loss of a
thing, and not wasting space on my email provider who limits on disc
storage if I don't claim the mail. :)
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
WB6HEF
San Bernardino, CA

Re: Brave browser

Travis Siegel <tsiegel@...>
 

When I tried it several months ago, it worked, though it didn't work well enough to make it a primary browser.  I did have one heck of a time getting it uninstalled though. 

This brave browser is based on chromium, which means it's opensource, so if you're concerned about security, go look at the source code, and set your mind to rest.

On 2/28/2019 4:28 PM, Andy wrote:

Vivaldi!  What a neat name for a browser!
 
Andy
 
----- Original Message -----
From: JM Casey
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser

Indeed, there are many other Chromium browsers out there.

Which reminds me, has anybody else taken Vivaldi for a spin?

I love how customisable it is but so far my screen-reader experience is a bit cluttered, and not all controls behave as I think they should.

It should be tweakable though.

 

 

From: nvda@nvda.groups.io <nvda@nvda.groups.io> On Behalf Of Shaun Everiss
Sent: February 27, 2019 10:46 PM
To: nvda@nvda.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser

 

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.

 

Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.

 

 

On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:

If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser. 

 

Gene

----- Original Message -----

From: Dan Beaver

Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM

Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser

 

How do we know this is a safe browser?

 

 

-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)

Virus-free. www.avast.com

locked Re: [POP] Saving messages from an account to export to another and one more question

Travis Siegel <tsiegel@...>
 

Of course, theree's nothing wrong with having both pop3 and imap accounts pointing to the same account, just leave the pop3 one account disabled until you wish to clear the messages out of the imap server. in that case, you can then activate the pop3 account, download the messages, and go back to using imap for everyday mail. 

There's loads of advantages to imap from an organizational standpoint, and that's why so many people like imap as a solution, because you can do things with it that can't be done with vanila pop3, though most email programs allow you to create mailboxes and save messages in them anyway, even via pop3 delivery.  The main difference between pop3 and imap is that imap places the management on the server, whereas pop3 places any organizational structure on the email client, and since many folks aren't well versed in their email program's capabilities, pop3 is seen as a bad solution.

I have several folders where I place messages I want to organize, and it's a simple matter to copy a message to another folder for future reference. 

Imap and pop3 are both email delivery protocols, which one you use depends heavily on what capabilities you need, how familiar you are with your email program, and how much effort you want to put into keeping your email organized as desired.  I'd not say one protocol is better than the other, both have their uses, and what works best for me isn't necessarily what works best for you.

On 2/28/2019 2:07 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:

Hi,
As the mod kindly asked to the old thread about POP to be closed I'm starting this new one to ask it.

When I ask for a way to backup my messages, actually, I'm talking about saving them.
Let me try to explain it better.
I use POP and I delete most of the messages right after reading/answering themm. However, there are those that I want to keep (and I do), some of them way behind from a month.
What I want, then, is to save these messages in a way that I could put them back on my other profile that I'm thinking about creating with IMAP.

I also would like to know if there's any difference regarding how Thunderbird deal with these messages using IMAP instead of POP. There'll be some difference when I open a message to read, to see its attachments and such?

Thanks in advance :)
--

Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook


Virus-free. www.avast.com

locked Re: [POP] Saving messages from an account to export to another and one more question

 

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 05:36 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:
It's considerably easier to hit that quota with imap than it is with pop3, since pop3 takes the messages off the server by default, thereby clearing space for new messages, imap doesn't do this.
Er, no.  Really, and Sarah's one-person example of having over 200K messages saved shows this.

Since most people can and do delete messages regularly the probability of filling up any e-mail server these days, whether using POP or IMAP is incredibly remote for any individual user.

I am going to lock this topic after this post.  If it's to continue, it should do so on the chat subgroup.   I had no idea this thing would take on the life it has, and had I known I would have moved it to chat on my first reply.

This is not even vaguely NVDA related, though it is a topic worthy of discussion, but not on the main group.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763  

A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.

          ~ Saul Bellow, To Jerusalem and Back

 

 

Re: Brave browser

Richard Wells
 

64-bit applications install in c:\Program Files. 32-bit applications install in c:\Program Files (x86) or in C:\Windows\SysWOW64.

On 2/28/2019 4:13 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
I don't know if you are totally wrong, I don't think you would be.
In my experiences, what I notice over the time is that the programs which have 64 bit versions goes to the X86 folder whereas those which are 32 goes to the other one.
That being said, I don't know why Kevin was expecting the program to install on a different folder if it's a 64 bit program as far as I could see based on what he wrote.

Em 28/02/2019 19:06, James AUSTIN escreveu:
Hi

I could be wrong about this so please correct me somebody if so, but I think that the suffix X 86 for program files points  to user installed applications. The original program files points to   applications installed by Windows. However in most installation wizards I have used you can choose where to install files.

Best wishes
James
On 28 Feb 2019, at 21:53, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io <the.big.white.shepherd@...> wrote:

Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.
If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all
It's only fair that one should be wary.
Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html 

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)

        


locked Re: [POP] Saving messages from an account to export to another and one more question

Travis Siegel <tsiegel@...>
 

Imap leaves the messages on your server.  The only way you can put the messages on your imap account is to resend the messages to yourself.  Unless there's a way to import messages directly into the email program, in which case, you'll still have them accessible from the email porogram, but only as a folder, and that folder will be on your local machine, not on the imap server, which is kind of the point of imap in the first place..

The issue you'll run into with imap is that if you hit your disk quota, then you won't be able to receive any more email.  It's considerably easier to hit that quota with imap than it is with pop3, since pop3 takes the messages off the server by default, thereby clearing space for new messages, imap doesn't do this.  Of course, places like gmail and others have decent size allotments for imap mailboxes, but it's still a consideration, and one most people don't even take into account, because most folks just assume storage is unlimited, which of course, it isn't.

On 2/28/2019 2:07 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:

Hi,
As the mod kindly asked to the old thread about POP to be closed I'm starting this new one to ask it.

When I ask for a way to backup my messages, actually, I'm talking about saving them.
Let me try to explain it better.
I use POP and I delete most of the messages right after reading/answering themm. However, there are those that I want to keep (and I do), some of them way behind from a month.
What I want, then, is to save these messages in a way that I could put them back on my other profile that I'm thinking about creating with IMAP.

I also would like to know if there's any difference regarding how Thunderbird deal with these messages using IMAP instead of POP. There'll be some difference when I open a message to read, to see its attachments and such?

Thanks in advance :)
--

Re: backing up thunderbird

Kevin Cussick
 

it is a program for backing up everything in any Mozilla program and then you can restore it say on a clean install and have all your stuff like address books and so on in mail. and bookmarks. in your firefox.

On 28/02/2019 22:29, Brice Mijares wrote:
Would you explain what this most backup is? thank you.
On 2/28/2019 2:14 PM, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io wrote:
Hi,   the easy way is download moz backup  and install it this will back up everything I have used it for years. download link from my one drive folder below.

https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ame5fFtwuKO3zFyN0iTjnA0hiJe3

On 28/02/2019 21:07, Annette Moore wrote:
ron, does this save all of your configuration, as well as your messages? I care more about the configuration than about actually keeping any of my messages because it took about an hour for me to get everything I wanted/needed configured to the way I needed it sinceI have three email accounts. I have the instructions saved that Richard Wels gave me, but shoot, if I could back all that up and not have to go through that again with any clean install of thunderbird on a future new computer, that would be great!

Annette

On 2/28/2019 1:13 PM, Ron Canazzi wrote:

Hi Group,


This probably varies from mail program to mail program, but when using Thunderbird, you can back up almost everything by doing the following.


1.  Close Thunderbird.

2.  From the run dialogue, type %appdata% and press enter.

3.  You are in the roaming folder.  This folder contains all the application data, settings, address book and e-mails from Thunderbird.

4.  navigate to the folder named Thunderbird and when highlighted, press control + C to copy that folder.

5.  Then paste this folder onto a thumb drive, external hard drive or some similar device and you have everything backed up.

6.  Now if for some reason, you need a fresh install of Thunderbird or if you get a new computer and use Thunderbird, you can simply install Thunderbird and navigate to the Roaming folder as described in steps 1 through 3 above and paste the contents of the Thunderbird folder that you have copied into the Roaming folder.


I do this every few days to keep the mail and settings of Thunderbird backed up.


On 2/28/2019 1:14 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
100% agreed. Very, very well said, indeed.

Now I definitely would like to know how I can backup my messages. I never did it before just because I never knew it was even possible. Help me with this, please?

Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>

Em 28/02/2019 15:09, Travis Siegel escreveu:

Wishing something would go away because it doesn't fit your definition of what is useful is just plain silly.

If that were the case, then I wish narrator would go away, I whish jaws wold go away, I wish windows would go away. Hell, I wish microsoft would go away.

\See, it serves no purpose.

There are people who use pop3, and it works just fine for them. There are definitely use cases where pop3 is a better fit than imap, and there are use cases where imap is clearly the better alternative.  Wishing one or the other would go away is just ignorance talking.

If you don't wish to use it, then don't, but that doesn't mean that others who are fully aware of what they're getting, and do wish to use it shouldn't do so.  I for one much prefer pop3, for several reasons, including disk usage, security, issues, ease of backup, and others.

When folks talk about folks loosing years worth of emails because they used pop3, my question is did those folks ever backup their mail? I'm thinking no.  Sure, it's not the easiest thing to move mail from one email client to another, but you're just as likely to loose all your imap messages if your email provider goes bye-bye as well, and nobody here can tell me that's never happened.

It's six of one, and half dozen of the other, use what works for you, and allow others to use what works for them.


On 2/28/2019 12:47 PM, Rosemarie Chavarria wrote:

With my old internet provider, I had a pop 3 account. After I got to a certain amount of messages, my email started bouncing. I don't think people are using pop so much anymore but I could be wrong. I wish pop 3 would go away too.

*From:*nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] *On Behalf Of *Sarah k Alawami
*Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2019 8:27 AM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] POP is unwise [was: Being Unsubscribed for Marking Messages as Spam #adminnotice]

Yes you can. I have about 200 thousand messages on gmail's server and it doesn't really complain at me. You can also clean them up using iMap as well. I use iMap and wish that pop 3 would just go away and die. All the email and attachments are backed up in the cloud and no matter what device as stated you are on you can always get your mail. I lost over 3 years worth of messages once so am not going back to pop3.

On 28 Feb 2019, at 7:49, Gene wrote:

    I don't use IMAP so others can answer the question.  But I'm
    sure you can delete messages if you wish. As I understand it,
    you can keep a large number on the server if you wish.

    Gene

    ----- Original Message -----

    *From:*marcio via Groups.Io
    <mailto:marcinhorj21=yahoo.com.br@groups.io>

    *Sent:*Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:37 AM

    *To:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>

    *Subject:*Re: [nvda] POP is unwise [was: Being Unsubscribed for
    Marking Messages as Spam #adminnotice]

    Em 28/02/2019 12:34, Gene escreveu:

        unless you want a permanent collection of all your received
        messages off site.

    Does it means that using IMAP I won't be able to delete any
    message?

    Cheers,

    Marcio
    Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>     Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--
They Ask Me If I'm Happy; I say Yes.
They ask: "How Happy are You?"
I Say: "I'm as happy as a stow away chimpanzee on a banana boat!"




Re: Brave browser

Kevin Cussick
 

Hi, nvda will run on 32 bit windows as it is only a 32 bit program but it will work on a 64 bit as well, brave should have installed in something like c:\programfiles\brave and not c:\programfilesx86\brave I might not have typed the last path correctly but I am sure you get the idea.

On 28/02/2019 22:27, hurrikennyandopo ... wrote:
Hi
I did the same went for the 64 bit version and after it was installed it showed up in the 32 bit part of windows not the 64 bit  side of windows. Could it be like nvda where nvda will work on both 32 and 64 bit machines but only has the file name for one.
I did not look at the file coming down but did not have a version on it like some as like x64 or x32 at the end.
Gene nz
On 1/03/2019 11:22 AM, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io wrote:
no worries we all make mistakes.

On 28/02/2019 22:18, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
Really? I always thought the opposite!
Shame on me! It seems I need to  learn a bit more before concluding anything. LOL

Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>

Em 28/02/2019 19:18, Andy escreveu:
Program Files X86 is for 32 bit programs.  If that is the folder in which it is installed, it is a 32 bit program.

Andy

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io" <the.big.white.shepherd=googlemail.com@groups.io>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser


Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.

If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all


It's only fair that one should be wary.






Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



--
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)






--
Image NVDA certified expert
Check out my website for NVDA tutorials and other blindness related material at http://www.accessibilitycentral.net
Regardless of where you are in New Zealand if you are near one of the APNK sites you can use a copy of the NVDA screen reader on one of their computers. To find out which location (or locations) are nearest to you please visit http://www.aotearoapeoplesnetwork.org/content/partner-libraries (Aotearoa People's Network Kaharoa). To find out which software is installed on the APNK network please visit the following linkhttp://www.aotearoapeoplesnetwork.info/faq/software To find out how to use NVDA on APNK computers please visit the following linkhttp://www.aotearoapeoplesnetwork.info/faq/nvda
To find out which software is available on the Christchurch City Library network, and how to start the NVDA screen reader, please go to the following links. Software available https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/faq/computers/#faq_5884How to start the NVDA screen reader on Christchurch City Library computers https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/faqs/what-screen-reader-software-is-available/
To find an NVDA certified expert near you, please visit the following link https://certification.nvaccess.org/. The certification page contains the official list of NVDA certified individuals from around the world, who have sat and successfully passed the NVDA expert exam.

Re: backing up thunderbird

Brice Mijares
 

Would you explain what this most backup is? thank you.

On 2/28/2019 2:14 PM, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io wrote:
Hi,   the easy way is download moz backup  and install it this will back up everything I have used it for years. download link from my one drive folder below.
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ame5fFtwuKO3zFyN0iTjnA0hiJe3
On 28/02/2019 21:07, Annette Moore wrote:
ron, does this save all of your configuration, as well as your messages? I care more about the configuration than about actually keeping any of my messages because it took about an hour for me to get everything I wanted/needed configured to the way I needed it sinceI have three email accounts. I have the instructions saved that Richard Wels gave me, but shoot, if I could back all that up and not have to go through that again with any clean install of thunderbird on a future new computer, that would be great!

Annette

On 2/28/2019 1:13 PM, Ron Canazzi wrote:

Hi Group,


This probably varies from mail program to mail program, but when using Thunderbird, you can back up almost everything by doing the following.


1.  Close Thunderbird.

2.  From the run dialogue, type %appdata% and press enter.

3.  You are in the roaming folder.  This folder contains all the application data, settings, address book and e-mails from Thunderbird.

4.  navigate to the folder named Thunderbird and when highlighted, press control + C to copy that folder.

5.  Then paste this folder onto a thumb drive, external hard drive or some similar device and you have everything backed up.

6.  Now if for some reason, you need a fresh install of Thunderbird or if you get a new computer and use Thunderbird, you can simply install Thunderbird and navigate to the Roaming folder as described in steps 1 through 3 above and paste the contents of the Thunderbird folder that you have copied into the Roaming folder.


I do this every few days to keep the mail and settings of Thunderbird backed up.


On 2/28/2019 1:14 PM, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
100% agreed. Very, very well said, indeed.

Now I definitely would like to know how I can backup my messages. I never did it before just because I never knew it was even possible. Help me with this, please?

Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>

Em 28/02/2019 15:09, Travis Siegel escreveu:

Wishing something would go away because it doesn't fit your definition of what is useful is just plain silly.

If that were the case, then I wish narrator would go away, I whish jaws wold go away, I wish windows would go away. Hell, I wish microsoft would go away.

\See, it serves no purpose.

There are people who use pop3, and it works just fine for them. There are definitely use cases where pop3 is a better fit than imap, and there are use cases where imap is clearly the better alternative.  Wishing one or the other would go away is just ignorance talking.

If you don't wish to use it, then don't, but that doesn't mean that others who are fully aware of what they're getting, and do wish to use it shouldn't do so.  I for one much prefer pop3, for several reasons, including disk usage, security, issues, ease of backup, and others.

When folks talk about folks loosing years worth of emails because they used pop3, my question is did those folks ever backup their mail? I'm thinking no.  Sure, it's not the easiest thing to move mail from one email client to another, but you're just as likely to loose all your imap messages if your email provider goes bye-bye as well, and nobody here can tell me that's never happened.

It's six of one, and half dozen of the other, use what works for you, and allow others to use what works for them.


On 2/28/2019 12:47 PM, Rosemarie Chavarria wrote:

With my old internet provider, I had a pop 3 account. After I got to a certain amount of messages, my email started bouncing. I don't think people are using pop so much anymore but I could be wrong. I wish pop 3 would go away too.

*From:*nvda@nvda.groups.io [mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io] *On Behalf Of *Sarah k Alawami
*Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2019 8:27 AM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] POP is unwise [was: Being Unsubscribed for Marking Messages as Spam #adminnotice]

Yes you can. I have about 200 thousand messages on gmail's server and it doesn't really complain at me. You can also clean them up using iMap as well. I use iMap and wish that pop 3 would just go away and die. All the email and attachments are backed up in the cloud and no matter what device as stated you are on you can always get your mail. I lost over 3 years worth of messages once so am not going back to pop3.

On 28 Feb 2019, at 7:49, Gene wrote:

    I don't use IMAP so others can answer the question.  But I'm
    sure you can delete messages if you wish. As I understand it,
    you can keep a large number on the server if you wish.

    Gene

    ----- Original Message -----

    *From:*marcio via Groups.Io
    <mailto:marcinhorj21=yahoo.com.br@groups.io>

    *Sent:*Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:37 AM

    *To:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>

    *Subject:*Re: [nvda] POP is unwise [was: Being Unsubscribed for
    Marking Messages as Spam #adminnotice]

    Em 28/02/2019 12:34, Gene escreveu:

        unless you want a permanent collection of all your received
        messages off site.

    Does it means that using IMAP I won't be able to delete any
    message?

    Cheers,

    Marcio
    Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>     Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--
They Ask Me If I'm Happy; I say Yes.
They ask: "How Happy are You?"
I Say: "I'm as happy as a stow away chimpanzee on a banana boat!"


Re: Brave browser

ADRIAN POCOCK
 

No 86 refers to 32 bit systems and has always been the case, on 64 bit windows system such as win 7 64 bit programs go to program files and 86 bit go to program files x 86.

The confusion could be that they have said it will work on 64 bit and maybe it is actually a 32 bit application.

Best Adrian Pocock.

On 28/02/2019 22:06, James AUSTIN wrote:
Hi

I could be wrong about this so please correct me somebody if so, but I think that the suffix X 86 for program files points  to user installed applications. The original program files points to   applications installed by Windows. However in most installation wizards I have used you can choose where to install files.

Best wishes
James
On 28 Feb 2019, at 21:53, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io <the.big.white.shepherd@...> wrote:

Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.
If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all
It's only fair that one should be wary.
Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html 

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)





Re: Brave browser

hurrikennyandopo ...
 

Hi


I did the same went for the 64 bit version and after it was installed it showed up in the 32 bit part of windows not the 64 bit  side of windows. Could it be like nvda where nvda will work on both 32 and 64 bit machines but only has the file name for one.


I did not look at the file coming down but did not have a version on it like some as like x64 or x32 at the end.


Gene nz


On 1/03/2019 11:22 AM, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io wrote:
no worries we all make mistakes.

On 28/02/2019 22:18, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
Really? I always thought the opposite!
Shame on me! It seems I need to  learn a bit more before concluding anything. LOL

Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>

Em 28/02/2019 19:18, Andy escreveu:
Program Files X86 is for 32 bit programs.  If that is the folder in which it is installed, it is a 32 bit program.

Andy

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io" <the.big.white.shepherd@...>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser


Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.

If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all


It's only fair that one should be wary.






Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)

















--
Check out my website for NVDA tutorials and other blindness related material at http://www.accessibilitycentral.net
 
Regardless of where you are in New Zealand if you are near one of the APNK sites you can use a copy of the NVDA screen reader on one of their computers. To find out which location (or locations) are nearest to you please visit http://www.aotearoapeoplesnetwork.org/content/partner-libraries (Aotearoa People's Network Kaharoa).
To find out which software is installed on the APNK network please visit the following link http://www.aotearoapeoplesnetwork.info/faq/software To find out how to use NVDA on APNK computers please visit the following link http://www.aotearoapeoplesnetwork.info/faq/nvda
 

To find out which software is available on the Christchurch City Library network, and how to start the NVDA screen reader, please go to the following links. Software available  https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/faq/computers/#faq_5884  How to start the NVDA screen reader on Christchurch City Library computers  https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/faqs/what-screen-reader-software-is-available/
 
To find an NVDA certified expert near you, please visit the following link https://certification.nvaccess.org/. The certification page contains the official list of NVDA certified individuals from around the world, who have sat and successfully passed the NVDA expert exam.

Re: Brave browser

Kevin Cussick
 

no worries we all make mistakes.

On 28/02/2019 22:18, marcio via Groups.Io wrote:
Really? I always thought the opposite!
Shame on me! It seems I need to  learn a bit more before concluding anything. LOL
Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
Em 28/02/2019 19:18, Andy escreveu:
Program Files X86 is for 32 bit programs.  If that is the folder in which it is installed, it is a 32 bit program.

Andy

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io" <the.big.white.shepherd=googlemail.com@groups.io>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser


Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.

If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all


It's only fair that one should be wary.






Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



--
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)





Re: Being Unsubscribed for Marking Messages as Spam #adminnotice

ADRIAN POCOCK
 

Hi

The discussion here has been enlightening to me, I am relatively new to newsgroups and forums and i didn't realise that deleting junk mail could cause such problems.  I must hold my hands up, I did it.  Is emptying the junk folder all at once causing the same problems.


Best Adrian Pocock

On 28/02/2019 14:22, Brian Vogel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 03:45 AM, Brian's Mail list account wrote:
Oh if only one could actually do that.. The real world is not that simple, sadly. See my long post.
One can actually do that in a great many cases, thus it is important that when one can, one does.   The real world is never simple.   Using POP in this day and age is unwise (though that is a separate issue of its own).
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763  

A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.

          ~ Saul Bellow, To Jerusalem and Back

 

 

Re: Brave browser

Brice Mijares
 

Is there not a portable version of this browser?

On 2/28/2019 12:55 PM, Mallard wrote:
You can get it at
www.brave.com
There are versions for all platforms.
hth, ciao,
Ollie
Il 28/02/2019 21:33, Andy ha scritto:

How do I obtain this browser?
Andy

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Gene <mailto:gsasner@...>
    *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
    *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:01 AM
    *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

    Did you try the site with JAVA scripts disabled?  The site may not
    be useable, or fully useable, but you may be able to do what you
    want on it.  You can cause the music not to play in various ways
    as well, while having JAVA scripts enabled. the choice is not
    between an add blocker or no add blocker. there are other ways
    that may result in making difficult sites, because of advertising,
    reasonably useable.
    Gene
    ----- original Message -----
    *From:* Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io
    <mailto:bglists=blueyonder.co.uk@groups.io>
    *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:54 AM
    *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
    *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

    The question these days is will the ads be blocked in such a way
    as to still
    allow access to the site. Many now seem to be able to see you have
    an ad
    blocker and will not let you in till you turn it off or grease
    their palm
    with  pieces of eight!

    Now I'd be happy to  turn them off, but the big problem I'm sure
    we as blind
    users have is that a very accessible site can be rendered unusable by
    stupidly designed adverts. Yesterday I allowed them on one site to be
    greeted by loud music and scrolling rubbish neither of which
    seemed to be in
    any way letting me  use the site. I'm sure its not deliberate but
    if you do
    not  take control of the advertising in the same way you do oas on
    site
    design, don't be surprised when blind people  go elsewhere.
     Brian

    bglists@... <mailto:bglists@...>
    Sent via blueyonder.
    Please address personal E-mail to:-
    briang1@... <mailto:briang1@...>,
    putting 'Brian Gaff'
    in the display name field.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Mallard" <mallard@... <mailto:mallard@...>>
    To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>>
    Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 6:42 AM
    Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser


    > Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android
    nor in
    > Windows.
    >
    > If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I
    don't see the
    > purpose of having them at all
    >
    >
    > It's only fair that one should be wary.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
    >>
    >> Well its the latest chromium alternertive.
    >>
    >> FFull add blocking and extra security.
    >>
    >> review here.
    >>
    >>
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html
    >>
    >> I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the
    eventual plan
    >> for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and
    tracks with
    >> its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.
    >>
    >> Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware
    though they
    >> say its false.
    >>
    >> Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.
    >>
    >> If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no
    garantee that
    >> eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another
    >> echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.
    >>
    >> This is a really new project, its not the first chromium
    sourced brouser
    >> and it will not be the last.
    >>
    >> One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome,
    >> firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a
    supported
    >> brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.
    >>
    >> Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such
    because of
    >> the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built
    using modern
    >> techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.
    >>
    >> But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff
    you won't
    >> get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or
    >> anything like that.
    >>
    >> The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to
    deal with
    >> now with eventually another person's adds.
    >>
    >> If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my
    antimalware software
    >> and turn off my firewall.
    >>
    >> Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.
    >>
    >>
    >> Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues
    doing so
    >> however who knows.
    >>
    >> Ports come and go.
    >>
    >> It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.
    >>
    >> CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till
    piriform went
    >> with avast.
    >>
    >> Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do
    malwareish things,
    >> trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other
    things I have
    >> to modify my ini file every day or so.
    >>
    >> Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total
    crap access
    >> wize.
    >>
    >> And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.
    >>
    >> I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have
    google
    >> spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use
    that but
    >> later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk
    and I had
    >> to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the
    extra
    >> junkware.
    >>
    >> Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled
    with any
    >> software is pritty much malware because most of the time the
    user has not
    >> requested that software so its malware.
    >>
    >> THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds
    or google
    >> trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.
    >>
    >> Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the
    other add
    >> makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.
    >>
    >> I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have
    blocked google
    >> and all sort of extras.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
    >>> If people do a Google or other search engine search for
    something like
    >>> Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments
    of the
    >>> browser.
    >>> Gene
    >>> ----- Original Message -----
    >>> *From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
    >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
    >>> *To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
    <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
    >>> *Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser
    >>>
    >>> How do we know this is a safe browser?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)
    >>
    >
    >
    >



Re: Brave browser

Kevin Cussick
 

Hi, yes the other way round.

On 28/02/2019 22:20, Andy wrote:

I think you have it backwards.
Andy
----- Original Message -----
*From:* marcio via Groups.Io
<mailto:marcinhorj21=yahoo.com.br@groups.io>
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:13 PM
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser
I don't know if you are totally wrong, I don't think you would be.
In my experiences, what I notice over the time is that the programs
which have 64 bit versions goes to the X86 folder whereas those
which are 32 goes to the other one.
That being said, I don't know why Kevin was expecting the program to
install on a different folder if it's a 64 bit program as far as I
could see based on what he wrote.
Cheers,
Marcio
Follow or add me on Facebook <https://facebook.com/firirinfonfon>
Em 28/02/2019 19:06, James AUSTIN escreveu:
Hi

I could be wrong about this so please correct me somebody if so, but I think that the suffix X 86 for program files points to user installed applications. The original program files points to applications installed by Windows. However in most installation wizards I have used you can choose where to install files.

Best wishes
James
On 28 Feb 2019, at 21:53, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io<the.big.white.shepherd=googlemail.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi, I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version. at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer. any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.
If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all
It's only fair that one should be wary.
Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html
I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver<mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:*nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



--
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)

Re: Brave browser

Kevin Cussick
 

thanks, sense but when I downloaded it it aid it was 64 bit.

On 28/02/2019 22:18, Andy wrote:
Program Files X86 is for 32 bit programs.  If that is the folder in which it is installed, it is a 32 bit program.
Andy
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io" <the.big.white.shepherd=googlemail.com@groups.io>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser

Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.

If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all


It's only fair that one should be wary.






Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



--
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)


Re: Brave browser

 

Really? I always thought the opposite!
Shame on me! It seems I need to  learn a bit more before concluding anything. LOL
Em 28/02/2019 19:18, Andy escreveu:

Program Files X86 is for 32 bit programs.  If that is the folder in which it is installed, it is a 32 bit program.

Andy

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io" <the.big.white.shepherd@...>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser


Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.

If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all


It's only fair that one should be wary.






Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)













Re: Brave browser

Andy
 


I think you have it backwards.
 
Andy
 

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser

I don't know if you are totally wrong, I don't think you would be.
In my experiences, what I notice over the time is that the programs which have 64 bit versions goes to the X86 folder whereas those which are 32 goes to the other one.
That being said, I don't know why Kevin was expecting the program to install on a different folder if it's a 64 bit program as far as I could see based on what he wrote.

Em 28/02/2019 19:06, James AUSTIN escreveu:
Hi

I could be wrong about this so please correct me somebody if so, but I think that the suffix X 86 for program files points  to user installed applications. The original program files points to   applications installed by Windows. However in most installation wizards I have used you can choose where to install files.

Best wishes
James
On 28 Feb 2019, at 21:53, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io <the.big.white.shepherd@...> wrote:

Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.
If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all
It's only fair that one should be wary.
Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html 

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)




Re: Brave browser

Andy
 

Program Files X86 is for 32 bit programs. If that is the folder in which it is installed, it is a 32 bit program.

Andy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io" <the.big.white.shepherd=googlemail.com@groups.io>
To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] Brave browser


Hi, I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version. at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer. any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.

If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all


It's only fair that one should be wary.






Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:

Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



--
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)

Re: Brave browser

 

I don't know if you are totally wrong, I don't think you would be.
In my experiences, what I notice over the time is that the programs which have 64 bit versions goes to the X86 folder whereas those which are 32 goes to the other one.
That being said, I don't know why Kevin was expecting the program to install on a different folder if it's a 64 bit program as far as I could see based on what he wrote.

Em 28/02/2019 19:06, James AUSTIN escreveu:

Hi

I could be wrong about this so please correct me somebody if so, but I think that the suffix X 86 for program files points  to user installed applications. The original program files points to   applications installed by Windows. However in most installation wizards I have used you can choose where to install files.

Best wishes
James
On 28 Feb 2019, at 21:53, Kevin Cussick via Groups.Io <the.big.white.shepherd@...> wrote:

Hi,   I installed the 64 bit butt yet it is in program files x86 and yes I am sure I have the 64 bit version.   at least when I went to the download page it said 64 bit installer.   any ideas anyone else had this?

On 28/02/2019 06:42, Mallard wrote:
Well, I haven't seen any ads at all in Brave, neither in Android nor in Windows.
If there are, they are well hidden. And if they're hidden, I don't see the purpose of having them at all
It's only fair that one should be wary.
Il 28/02/2019 04:45, Shaun Everiss ha scritto:
Well its the latest chromium alternertive.

FFull add blocking and extra security.

review here.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/web-browsers/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html 

I do caution users, in the article link I pasted above the eventual plan for brave is to replace all adds from other's websites and tracks with its own adds and trackers or at least thats what I read.

Some antimalware and security tools detect brave as malware though they say its false.

Reviews seem generally good now, but I am not sure.

If this brouser is replacing adds with its own, there is no garantee that eventually you trade a malware free environment with using another echosystem, with its own adds, trackers, and malware thrown in.

This is a really new project, its not the first chromium sourced brouser and it will not be the last.

One other thing to note, its not a main stay brouser like chrome, firefox, ie and edge, so interface wize while it may be good, a supported brouser that is supported is better than one which may have issues.

Now saying that with nvda that probably doesn't matter as such because of the fact nvda itself is basically a scripted program built using modern techniques and using commen os access commands and apis.

But Its probable that if you run something like dolphin stuff you won't get access and its unlikely that it would be supported by jaws or anything like that.

The thing I don't care for is trading all the malware I have to deal with now with eventually another person's adds.

If I am ready to do this, I may as well uninstall my antimalware software and turn off my firewall.

Users do have glowing reviews right now but its new.


Now if you want to try it you probably won't have any issues doing so however who knows.

Ports come and go.

It may have some big names developing it but look at piriform.

CCleaner is a good program, it used to be really good till piriform went with avast.

Now ccleaner is its own malware, and sadly it does do malwareish things, trying to have quickclean run, and a entire load of other things I have to modify my ini file every day or so.

Its interface or at least the main interface panel is total crap access wize.

And it comes with avast which is total crap access wize to.

I used to use programs with dvdvideosoftware they used to have google spyware in them and I don't care about google because I use that but later it had conduit then opencandy, then a lot of other junk and I had to get rid of it and reformat my system to get rid of all the extra junkware.

Sadly it seems to be the rage, any software that is bundled with any software is pritty much malware because most of the time the user has not requested that software so its malware.

THats another issue with brave, it does not block google adds or google trackers, so we know who is funding brave now.

Now if brave got cash from doubleclick, yahoo adds and all the other add makers to have their adds unblocked then we have a problem.

I know that with waterfox I have full control, and I have blocked google and all sort of extras.



On 28/02/2019 11:12 AM, Gene wrote:
If people do a Google or other search engine search for something like Brave browser review, they may find knowledgeable assessments of the browser.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Dan Beaver <mailto:dbeaver888@...>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* nvda@nvda.groups.io <mailto:nvda@nvda.groups.io>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda] Brave browser

How do we know this is a safe browser?



-- 
Dan Beaver (KC4DOY)