Recuva
Don H
Has anyone tried using the Recuva recovery software package made by the same company that makes ccleaner?
|
|
Yes.
-- Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134 The psychology of adultery has been falsified by conventional morals, which assume, in monogamous countries, that attraction to one person cannot co-exist with a serious affection for another. Everybody knows that this is untrue. . . ~ Bertrand Russell
|
|
hi.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
i tested many versions of recuva and could learn and use it without any tutorial or help. it is an user friendly and simple program to learn and use.
On 10/11/18, Brian Vogel <britechguy@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes. --
By God, were I given all the seven heavens with all they contain in order that I may disobey God by depriving an ant from the husk of a grain of barley, I would not do it. imam ali
|
|
Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
Yes I downloaded the portable version to help me get some files back about a month ago. Its OK, and gives you a feedback as to whether you can or cannot do it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Obviously once deleted any writing to the disc stands a good chance of overwriting the data. I downloaded it on an old xp machine and put it on a ram stick to run it from there to cut down on the writing on the machine with the lost files. Brian bglists@blueyonder.co.uk Sent via blueyonder. Please address personal E-mail to:- briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff' in the display name field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don H" <lmddh50@adams.net> To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:22 AM Subject: [nvda] Recuva Has anyone tried using the Recuva recovery software package made by the same company that makes ccleaner?
|
|
Tony Ballou
Hi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Yes, I have, and it works well with NVDA. tony
On 10/10/2018 8:22 PM, Don H wrote:
Has anyone tried using the Recuva recovery software package made by
|
|
Don H
I could not get to read the list of files it found that could be recovered.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 10/11/2018 6:12 AM, Tony Ballou wrote:
Hi,
|
|
Brian's Mail list account <bglists@...>
Well was this with a portable version of nvda by any chance?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Brian bglists@blueyonder.co.uk Sent via blueyonder. Please address personal E-mail to:- briang1@blueyonder.co.uk, putting 'Brian Gaff' in the display name field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don H" <lmddh50@adams.net> To: <nvda@nvda.groups.io> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:55 PM Subject: Re: [nvda] Recuva I could not get to read the list of files it found that could be recovered.
|
|
I have used and like Recuva. That being said, depending on exactly what sort of recovery is being done, it may not be the best tool for the task. I have been wondering since the topic started exactly what it is that the recovery attempt is being made for and on what medium.
For partition recoveries or even mass file recoveries TestDisk may be the better tool, though I cannot speak to its accessibility. Also, if the file one wishes to recover is on a HDD or SSD that's still being actively used, time is of the essence since the blocks now marked as free are up for grabs for reuse at any moment. When using any recovery tool it is essential that the disc being recovered from be offline and that what's being recovered be recovered to a different disk, at least if we're talking about trying to get something more than a single file or a couple of files. If the latter, you still have "the clock is ticking" factor if the disc is in use. -- Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134 The psychology of adultery has been falsified by conventional morals, which assume, in monogamous countries, that attraction to one person cannot co-exist with a serious affection for another. Everybody knows that this is untrue. . . ~ Bertrand Russell
|
|
Don H
No not a portable version of NVDA
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 10/11/2018 10:08 AM, Brian's Mail list account via Groups.Io wrote:
Well was this with a portable version of nvda by any chance?
|
|