AutoComplete (not AutoFill) behavior with NVDA using various web browsers


Gene
 

All you need do is turn off speech with NVDA key s before typing in a field where autocomplete is present.  I find autocomplete to be very useful and I wouldn't be without it.

If, for example, I want to open the New York Times, I go to the input field, control l, and I just type one letter, n.  Perhaps the browser places the New York Times address in the field because its the most frequent site I go to that begins with n, but all I have to do is press enter and the home page opens.  I don't have to use book marks or take any other steps, just control l, type n, then press enter.

My impression is that a lot of browser users have no idea how convenient autocomplete may be.

If I want to open Newsweek, I type the word news and the address appears in the input field so its just control l, news enter.  If autocomplete doesn't announce what is in the field, and it doesn't at times, I use read current line to be sure before I press enter.

While I only use autocomplete for a very few sites, it is very convenient for those sites.

Gene

Gene

On 1/31/2023 2:46 AM, Brian's Mail list account via groups.io wrote:
I do hate auto complete or lists of results that dynamically change as you type. Perhaps its me, but it puts me off when I'm typing, interrupting my thought process.
So what I'd like is a way to stop that behaviour, then look at the list afterwards, like in some spell checkers I've used.
From the search point of view, we are basically saying then is that Jaws stops the built in command in the browser, and inserts its own? That seems a dangerous course to take. You almost need a sub menu like applications built in command and Screenreader version.
Brian


David Ouimet
 

That is tremendous. Thank you so much for sharing this Luke. I just did those find command changes you mentioned in the input gestures and it works the same way with find as jaws does now.  

David


Travis Siegel
 

I understand that a lot of folks find autocomplete useful.  I however, do not.  I hate it, and if I could turn it off, I would. What should happen is this:

You start typing.  If you want autocompletion results, you should press the up/down arrows to scroll through the previous entries in the edit field in which you are typing.  This would serve the same purpose without causing undue frustration to those of us who hate that feature.  Personally, I think it's a bug that somebody decided should be labeled as a feature instead.

It has always bugged me when applications do this.

On 1/31/2023 4:47 AM, Gene wrote:
All you need do is turn off speech with NVDA key s before typing in a field where autocomplete is present.  I find autocomplete to be very useful and I wouldn't be without it.

If, for example, I want to open the New York Times, I go to the input field, control l, and I just type one letter, n.  Perhaps the browser places the New York Times address in the field because its the most frequent site I go to that begins with n, but all I have to do is press enter and the home page opens.  I don't have to use book marks or take any other steps, just control l, type n, then press enter.

My impression is that a lot of browser users have no idea how convenient autocomplete may be.

If I want to open Newsweek, I type the word news and the address appears in the input field so its just control l, news enter.  If autocomplete doesn't announce what is in the field, and it doesn't at times, I use read current line to be sure before I press enter.

While I only use autocomplete for a very few sites, it is very convenient for those sites.

Gene

Gene
On 1/31/2023 2:46 AM, Brian's Mail list account via groups.io wrote:
I do hate auto complete or lists of results that dynamically change as you type. Perhaps its me, but it puts me off when I'm typing, interrupting my thought process.
So what I'd like is a way to stop that behaviour, then look at the list afterwards, like in some spell checkers I've used.
From the search point of view, we are basically saying then is that Jaws stops the built in command in the browser, and inserts its own? That seems a dangerous course to take. You almost need a sub menu like applications built in command and Screenreader version.
Brian




 

Travis,

I absolutely agree with you.  Autocomplete should behave similarly to, say, Windows search, where what you've typed in the search box/edit box causes what's listed below it to change based upon changing input, but you don't get things read to you unless you choose to traverse the results list.

I love autocomplete, but because when using it by vision it is, essentially, behaving exactly as you mention.  Although I am presented a completed option, that I could choose by hitting tab, that's not read (of course when no screen reader is on) and it's also always the thing that's at the top of the results list based upon the input so far.  For a screen reader user, it would make much more sense to me to not have anything read from the edit box/address bar, and only read if you choose to down arrow once to see what might have turned up first.

For most of us, the first few, particularly 2, characters typed in a web address edit box can return literally hundreds of prior pages you've visited if you are not someone who clears their browsing history.

It would drive me insane if I had to deal with how autocomplete shows, visually, in the web address box "by ear."  It's very easy to visually screen out the stippled characters that show the "best guess" for autocomplete as you type, but having each character typed announce the next "best guess" would be maddening.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


 

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 05:59 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:
I could turn it off,
-
You can in all browsers I've used.  I've just pulled up the setting in Vivaldi and Microsoft Edge.  What browser are you using where you'd like to turn it off.

In Edge, the two settings are:
Show me search and site suggestions using my typed characters
and
Show me suggestions from history, favorites and other data on this device using my typed characters

Vivaldi's is: Address Auto-Complete

Firefox has much finer granularity on its Privacy & Security settings pane under the Address Bar — Firefox Suggest, section.

For Chrome, these instructions, seem to get rid of autocomplete in the address bar itself, though the list that shows up below it is still generated.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


Gene
 

The best solution might be to make no change in what is read in terms of the line being read.  If you start arrowing away from the line, you may well see suggestions that don't apply because the applicable suggestion is on the address line.  the best solution would probably be to have the screen-reader read the line after a pause in typing of perhaps half a second.  That would keep speech from being generated while typing and allow the user to hear what is on the line in case he/she wants to go to that site without a meaningfully inefficient delay.  It also would not make it necessary for the user to remove his hands from around the home keys to execute a read current line command to hear what is there.

Gene

On 1/31/2023 5:06 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:

Travis,

I absolutely agree with you.  Autocomplete should behave similarly to, say, Windows search, where what you've typed in the search box/edit box causes what's listed below it to change based upon changing input, but you don't get things read to you unless you choose to traverse the results list.

I love autocomplete, but because when using it by vision it is, essentially, behaving exactly as you mention.  Although I am presented a completed option, that I could choose by hitting tab, that's not read (of course when no screen reader is on) and it's also always the thing that's at the top of the results list based upon the input so far.  For a screen reader user, it would make much more sense to me to not have anything read from the edit box/address bar, and only read if you choose to down arrow once to see what might have turned up first.

For most of us, the first few, particularly 2, characters typed in a web address edit box can return literally hundreds of prior pages you've visited if you are not someone who clears their browsing history.

It would drive me insane if I had to deal with how autocomplete shows, visually, in the web address box "by ear."  It's very easy to visually screen out the stippled characters that show the "best guess" for autocomplete as you type, but having each character typed announce the next "best guess" would be maddening.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881



 

Gene,

That would be fine, too.  But what happens now as far as "instantaneously" announcing the changing suggestions as each character is typed makes no sense.

If you had to pause for even one second before the in-address-box auto complete suggestion was read that could work for most.

It would be nice if the browsers made it really easy to turn the address bar autocomplete off and the screen readers would let you decide if you even wanted the in-address-bar text that you have not typed to be announced even if the option remains on in the browser.  I'd favor the latter just because autocomplete is always on in my experience and I don't know of many (any, of my acquaintance) screen reader users who like the cacophony from constant and instantaneous reading of the completion option of the moment as you're typing.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


Travis Siegel
 

I use chrome, and although they have a autofill section in the settings, it only refers to passwords, addresses, and credit card information.  There's nothing there about the address/search bar.

On 1/31/2023 6:19 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 05:59 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:
I could turn it off,
-
You can in all browsers I've used.  I've just pulled up the setting in Vivaldi and Microsoft Edge.  What browser are you using where you'd like to turn it off.

In Edge, the two settings are:
Show me search and site suggestions using my typed characters
and
Show me suggestions from history, favorites and other data on this device using my typed characters

Vivaldi's is: Address Auto-Complete

Firefox has much finer granularity on its Privacy & Security settings pane under the Address Bar — Firefox Suggest, section.

For Chrome, these instructions, seem to get rid of autocomplete in the address bar itself, though the list that shows up below it is still generated.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


Travis Siegel
 

Gene.  I don't know what you're talking about here.

Nobody said anything about arrowing away from the input line.  The suggestion was that up/down arrows would  show you suggestions based on previous input inputs.  You can do that now with chrome, only the difference is that it autofills the address based on what it thinks you're going to type.  That's the part that needs to go away.  If I want it to fill in something, I'll select it from the suggestions, or press the tab key, and it can fill in the first one in the list.  That's simple and straight forward, and doesn't irritate the hell of people like me who can't stand the stupid autofill feature.


On 1/31/2023 6:35 PM, Gene wrote:

The best solution might be to make no change in what is read in terms of the line being read.  If you start arrowing away from the line, you may well see suggestions that don't apply because the applicable suggestion is on the address line.  the best solution would probably be to have the screen-reader read the line after a pause in typing of perhaps half a second.  That would keep speech from being generated while typing and allow the user to hear what is on the line in case he/she wants to go to that site without a meaningfully inefficient delay.  It also would not make it necessary for the user to remove his hands from around the home keys to execute a read current line command to hear what is there.

Gene

On 1/31/2023 5:06 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
Travis,

I absolutely agree with you.  Autocomplete should behave similarly to, say, Windows search, where what you've typed in the search box/edit box causes what's listed below it to change based upon changing input, but you don't get things read to you unless you choose to traverse the results list.

I love autocomplete, but because when using it by vision it is, essentially, behaving exactly as you mention.  Although I am presented a completed option, that I could choose by hitting tab, that's not read (of course when no screen reader is on) and it's also always the thing that's at the top of the results list based upon the input so far.  For a screen reader user, it would make much more sense to me to not have anything read from the edit box/address bar, and only read if you choose to down arrow once to see what might have turned up first.

For most of us, the first few, particularly 2, characters typed in a web address edit box can return literally hundreds of prior pages you've visited if you are not someone who clears their browsing history.

It would drive me insane if I had to deal with how autocomplete shows, visually, in the web address box "by ear."  It's very easy to visually screen out the stippled characters that show the "best guess" for autocomplete as you type, but having each character typed announce the next "best guess" would be maddening.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881



Gene
 

Earlier someone proposed that nothing be spoken unless you up or down arrow away from the address line to see the suggestions in the list.  If you do that, you won't see the suggestion which appears to be the most common site you go to based on the number of letters you typed.  That appears to be what is shown in the address bar.  If I want to go to The New York Times Home page, I can just type n and the address appears in the address bar.  I can then press enter and the page opens.  No use of book marks, no use of history, what could be more efficient than n followed by enter.

Perhaps if speech were delayed by half a second after you type in the address line from autocomplete, more people might be interested in using the feature.  I don't think most people are aware of how it works or how convenient it can be for sites you visit frequently.  that may in part be because autocomplete has such a bad reputation that it isn't taught as I am discussing it and people don't try it because all they want to do is not hear speech so they don't think of experimenting with it.

Gene

On 1/31/2023 7:07 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:

Gene.  I don't know what you're talking about here.

Nobody said anything about arrowing away from the input line.  The suggestion was that up/down arrows would  show you suggestions based on previous input inputs.  You can do that now with chrome, only the difference is that it autofills the address based on what it thinks you're going to type.  That's the part that needs to go away.  If I want it to fill in something, I'll select it from the suggestions, or press the tab key, and it can fill in the first one in the list.  That's simple and straight forward, and doesn't irritate the hell of people like me who can't stand the stupid autofill feature.


On 1/31/2023 6:35 PM, Gene wrote:
The best solution might be to make no change in what is read in terms of the line being read.  If you start arrowing away from the line, you may well see suggestions that don't apply because the applicable suggestion is on the address line.  the best solution would probably be to have the screen-reader read the line after a pause in typing of perhaps half a second.  That would keep speech from being generated while typing and allow the user to hear what is on the line in case he/she wants to go to that site without a meaningfully inefficient delay.  It also would not make it necessary for the user to remove his hands from around the home keys to execute a read current line command to hear what is there.

Gene

On 1/31/2023 5:06 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
Travis,

I absolutely agree with you.  Autocomplete should behave similarly to, say, Windows search, where what you've typed in the search box/edit box causes what's listed below it to change based upon changing input, but you don't get things read to you unless you choose to traverse the results list.

I love autocomplete, but because when using it by vision it is, essentially, behaving exactly as you mention.  Although I am presented a completed option, that I could choose by hitting tab, that's not read (of course when no screen reader is on) and it's also always the thing that's at the top of the results list based upon the input so far.  For a screen reader user, it would make much more sense to me to not have anything read from the edit box/address bar, and only read if you choose to down arrow once to see what might have turned up first.

For most of us, the first few, particularly 2, characters typed in a web address edit box can return literally hundreds of prior pages you've visited if you are not someone who clears their browsing history.

It would drive me insane if I had to deal with how autocomplete shows, visually, in the web address box "by ear."  It's very easy to visually screen out the stippled characters that show the "best guess" for autocomplete as you type, but having each character typed announce the next "best guess" would be maddening.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881




 

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:21 PM, Gene wrote:
Earlier someone proposed that nothing be spoken unless you up or down arrow away from the address line to see the suggestions in the list.  If you do that, you won't see the suggestion which appears to be the most common site you go to based on the number of letters you typed. 
-
That must depend on the browser.  In Firefox, Edge, and Vivaldi, where I do not have autocomplete turned off, the first thing at the top of the list beneath the address bar is always what's showing as the current autocomplete option in the address bar.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


Gene
 

It would have to be checked to compare what a screen-reader says with what you see.  When I move out of the address bar, I don't hear repeated what is spoken if I remain in the address bar.  I've checked this in Firefox and Edge.

Gene
On 1/31/2023 7:28 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:21 PM, Gene wrote:
Earlier someone proposed that nothing be spoken unless you up or down arrow away from the address line to see the suggestions in the list.  If you do that, you won't see the suggestion which appears to be the most common site you go to based on the number of letters you typed. 
-
That must depend on the browser.  In Firefox, Edge, and Vivaldi, where I do not have autocomplete turned off, the first thing at the top of the list beneath the address bar is always what's showing as the current autocomplete option in the address bar.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881



Dave Grossoehme
 

I'm with you here, on autofill.  I hate it with a pashion.

Dave


On 1/31/2023 8:07 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:

Gene.  I don't know what you're talking about here.

Nobody said anything about arrowing away from the input line.  The suggestion was that up/down arrows would  show you suggestions based on previous input inputs.  You can do that now with chrome, only the difference is that it autofills the address based on what it thinks you're going to type.  That's the part that needs to go away.  If I want it to fill in something, I'll select it from the suggestions, or press the tab key, and it can fill in the first one in the list.  That's simple and straight forward, and doesn't irritate the hell of people like me who can't stand the stupid autofill feature.


On 1/31/2023 6:35 PM, Gene wrote:
The best solution might be to make no change in what is read in terms of the line being read.  If you start arrowing away from the line, you may well see suggestions that don't apply because the applicable suggestion is on the address line.  the best solution would probably be to have the screen-reader read the line after a pause in typing of perhaps half a second.  That would keep speech from being generated while typing and allow the user to hear what is on the line in case he/she wants to go to that site without a meaningfully inefficient delay.  It also would not make it necessary for the user to remove his hands from around the home keys to execute a read current line command to hear what is there.

Gene

On 1/31/2023 5:06 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
Travis,

I absolutely agree with you.  Autocomplete should behave similarly to, say, Windows search, where what you've typed in the search box/edit box causes what's listed below it to change based upon changing input, but you don't get things read to you unless you choose to traverse the results list.

I love autocomplete, but because when using it by vision it is, essentially, behaving exactly as you mention.  Although I am presented a completed option, that I could choose by hitting tab, that's not read (of course when no screen reader is on) and it's also always the thing that's at the top of the results list based upon the input so far.  For a screen reader user, it would make much more sense to me to not have anything read from the edit box/address bar, and only read if you choose to down arrow once to see what might have turned up first.

For most of us, the first few, particularly 2, characters typed in a web address edit box can return literally hundreds of prior pages you've visited if you are not someone who clears their browsing history.

It would drive me insane if I had to deal with how autocomplete shows, visually, in the web address box "by ear."  It's very easy to visually screen out the stippled characters that show the "best guess" for autocomplete as you type, but having each character typed announce the next "best guess" would be maddening.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881



 

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 03:46 PM, Dave Grossoehme wrote:
I'm with you here, on autofill.  I hate it with a pashion.
-
The following is not said with snark, nor specifically for you, but in case someone missed several of my earlier messages:  You can turn it off!

And if you hate it, and I will never argue taste, and this is a feature one likes or dislikes, turn it off.

If anyone needs step-by-step instructions for a specific browser, and hasn't found the answer by searching, please feel free to post a topic on the Chat Subgroup since the focus of said question is a browser's settings and has nada to do with NVDA proper.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


 

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:36 PM, Gene wrote:
It would have to be checked to compare what a screen-reader says with what you see. 
-
OK, here's the deal by browser:

Firefox:  NVDA is not reading anything related to autofill when I'm in the address bar and typing, even when a suggestion is there.  In the vast majority of cases, and it's so consistent that I'd say this is the technique to use on Firefox, if I down arrow the first thing I land on is NOT the first thing in the autocomplete list, which is what would have completed in the address bar had I hit TAB, but on the second, which is read.  If I up arrow once, the auto complete that would have occurred in the address bar had I tabbed is read.  But in all cases, you can get good information from NVDA.  If you up arrow back in to the address bar, NVDA reads whatever it is that you had typed so far, which is generally pretty easy to recognize if you've only entered a few characters.

Edge: As it turns out, the behavior is exactly the same.  I get no feedback about what would autocomplete from NVDA as I type in the address bar.  If I down arrow after typing a certain number of characters that has triggered an autocomplete list, the first thing landed on is always the second in the list.  I suspect that this is actually a browser feature, because if you're sighted and you can see what would autocomplete, it would be really annoying to have the first thing you land on be exactly the same thing you could have gotten by hitting TAB.

I'm happy to test out any browser anyone else might want me to, unless I'd have to install it, in which case I might or might not do so here and request we do a remote session where I'm actually doing the test on your computer and you can listen to exactly what your screen reader is saying (if I have the time).

But, overall, you can easily review the entire autocomplete list, provided you do a down arrow, followed by an up arrow, to land back on what would have autocompleted with a tab.  After you've reviewed that, if it's not what you wanted, you can keep down arrowing through the remaining suggestions, or up arrow into the address bar and keep adding to what you already had there, beginning again with the autocomplete list after you've added those characters for the autocomplete search.  Feedback from NVDA is accurate and directly reflects what is shown, though it does not explicitly say if it's a search versus a URL until it hits the URL if you have enabled direct web searching from the address box, which I always do.

The first option in the autocomplete list in my experience is always a URL you've visited before if the characters you've typed will map to one.  Mind you, if you start typing something like washingtonpost.com, that first URL is likely to be a specific story or section page, and NVDA announces the title of said page before the actual naked URL content, which is what I'd want and expect.  Naked URLs tell me much less than a title does when it comes to webpages.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


Gene
 

What appears in the address bar, is, I suspect, dependent on what you open the most using the letter or letters you type like a search.  If the site you open the most that begins with the letter n is The New York Times, just typing n will cause it to appear in the address bar.  If you continue to type and add ews and if the most often opened site using news is Newsweek, that will appear in the address bar. 

If I type n and continue to type, if I type rather quickly, I may hear bits of speech as the address bar presents new information but, as usual, continuing to type stops that speech.  If I typed more slowly, I would here more of what appears in the address bar.

If I want to open something from the address bar with the fewest letters typed, I type one letter, pause a moment and see if I hear an address.  If I don't, I use read current line because NVDA doesn't always announce what appears there.  If it is what I want, then I know that all I have to do is type one letter in the address bar, wait a moment to hear confirmation, then press enter. 

I still maintain that the address bar has such a bad reputation among blind Internet users that the convenience of using it to go to sites you visit a lot is overlooked.  What can be more convenient and faster, if I want to open The New York Times page, than to type the letter n, wait a moment to hear the address of the Times web site for verification that it is there, and press enter?  If I want to go to GMail, what can be faster than for me to type the letters g and m, wait for confirmation, and press enter.  I go to groups.io by just typing gr, waiting, then pressing enter. 

Gene

On 2/3/2023 12:00 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:36 PM, Gene wrote:
It would have to be checked to compare what a screen-reader says with what you see. 
-
OK, here's the deal by browser:

Firefox:  NVDA is not reading anything related to autofill when I'm in the address bar and typing, even when a suggestion is there.  In the vast majority of cases, and it's so consistent that I'd say this is the technique to use on Firefox, if I down arrow the first thing I land on is NOT the first thing in the autocomplete list, which is what would have completed in the address bar had I hit TAB, but on the second, which is read.  If I up arrow once, the auto complete that would have occurred in the address bar had I tabbed is read.  But in all cases, you can get good information from NVDA.  If you up arrow back in to the address bar, NVDA reads whatever it is that you had typed so far, which is generally pretty easy to recognize if you've only entered a few characters.

Edge: As it turns out, the behavior is exactly the same.  I get no feedback about what would autocomplete from NVDA as I type in the address bar.  If I down arrow after typing a certain number of characters that has triggered an autocomplete list, the first thing landed on is always the second in the list.  I suspect that this is actually a browser feature, because if you're sighted and you can see what would autocomplete, it would be really annoying to have the first thing you land on be exactly the same thing you could have gotten by hitting TAB.

I'm happy to test out any browser anyone else might want me to, unless I'd have to install it, in which case I might or might not do so here and request we do a remote session where I'm actually doing the test on your computer and you can listen to exactly what your screen reader is saying (if I have the time).

But, overall, you can easily review the entire autocomplete list, provided you do a down arrow, followed by an up arrow, to land back on what would have autocompleted with a tab.  After you've reviewed that, if it's not what you wanted, you can keep down arrowing through the remaining suggestions, or up arrow into the address bar and keep adding to what you already had there, beginning again with the autocomplete list after you've added those characters for the autocomplete search.  Feedback from NVDA is accurate and directly reflects what is shown, though it does not explicitly say if it's a search versus a URL until it hits the URL if you have enabled direct web searching from the address box, which I always do.

The first option in the autocomplete list in my experience is always a URL you've visited before if the characters you've typed will map to one.  Mind you, if you start typing something like washingtonpost.com, that first URL is likely to be a specific story or section page, and NVDA announces the title of said page before the actual naked URL content, which is what I'd want and expect.  Naked URLs tell me much less than a title does when it comes to webpages.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881



 

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 01:20 PM, Gene wrote:
What appears in the address bar, is, I suspect, dependent on what you open the most using the letter or letters you type like a search.  If the site you open the most that begins with the letter n is The New York Times, just typing n will cause it to appear in the address bar.  If you continue to type and add ews and if the most often opened site using news is Newsweek, that will appear in the address bar. 
-
That is precisely what happens, and if what you are typing has no corresponding URL or page title, and you have your address bar settings such that it is used for web searches as well as web addresses, you will start getting search suggestions based on what you typed so far that you can review.

What I can't figure out is why others, and this is the majority, are hearing anything in regard to autocomplete as they type.  I get some typing feedback if I'm going slow enough, and have the settings on to get letter by letter feedback, but never is NVDA announcing the "what the expansion were if I were to stop typing now and just hit tab to complete it" showing is.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


 

By the way, and I will intentionally split off this offshoot in a couple of minutes, we really need to take the discussion of Autocomplete into a topic of its own.  It's really not related to any screen reader's find.

It's also not related to autofill, which tries to fill out online form fields all in one fell swoop, based on what you've entered for fields such as first name, last name, street address, etc., in the past.  And I've wondered a couple of times if there's a bit of discussion of autofill rather than autocomplete and vice versa.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881


 

This is the topic on which all subsequent discussion of how AutoComplete for the address bar and NVDA interact in any browser, with details regarding the browser being discussed given as needed.  If you're using anything other than NVDA 2022.4, then you need to mention the NVDA version, too.
--

Brian Virginia, USA Windows 11 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 22H2, Build 22621; Office 2016, Version 16.0.15726.20188, 32-bit

It is much easier to be critical than to be correct.

       ~ Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881