|
Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Hi, Ah yes… I do plan to publish a third-party try build that’ll include newer UEB tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this weekend. Cheers, Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Do you mean an addon? If so, I'll keep a look out on the addons list to see when it comes out.
From: joseph.lee22590@... To: nvda@groups.io Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:50:58 -0700 Hi, Ah yes… I do plan to publish a third-party try build that’ll include newer UEB tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this weekend. Cheers, Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Hi, No, not an add-on – a full NVDA build. Cheers, Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:55 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Do you mean an addon? If so, I'll keep a look out on the addons list to see when it comes out.
From: joseph.lee22590@...
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:50:58 -0700 Hi, Ah yes… I do plan to publish a third-party try build that’ll include newer UEB tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this weekend. Cheers, Joseph Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Ben J. Bloomgren
How does one implement Braille tables into NVDA
which aren't currently present? There's a jerry-rigged way to do so with the
*.JBT files within Jaws.
Ben
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:50
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in
NVDA
Hi,
Ah
yes…
I
do plan to publish a third-party try build that’ll include newer UEB tables
(as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this
weekend.
Cheers,
Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward
[mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016
12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The
UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
In recent emails, I
mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about
inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things
that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me
NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were
present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in
an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little
confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting
inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus
emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is
also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not
contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed
but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell,
it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still
presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as
the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming
from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never
looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being
relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if
anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have
been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like
a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things
correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and
although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes
into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet.
My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been
brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again.
:D
|
|
|
Christopher-Mark Gilland <clgilland07@...>
Ben,
They've updated JFW where it's not as hard as
that old trick you did in V11 anymore. I can help you privately with this
more, if you'd like.
---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Training
Instructor.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:01
PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in
NVDA
How does one implement Braille tables into NVDA
which aren't currently present? There's a jerry-rigged way to do so with the
*.JBT files within Jaws.
Ben
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016
12:50
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used
in NVDA
Hi,
Ah
yes…
I
do plan to publish a third-party try build that’ll include newer UEB tables
(as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this
weekend.
Cheers,
Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward
[mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda]
The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
In recent emails, I
mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about
inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things
that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me
NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were
present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and
in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little
confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting
inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus
emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is
also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not
contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed
but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the
cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are
still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I
recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in
UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two
weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to
the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a
Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I
apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013
that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those
working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed
some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next
update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd
point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes
and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I
needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Hi,
Braille tables in NVDA comes from LibLouis, the braille translation library used by NVDA.
Cheers,
Joseph
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben J. Bloomgren" <bbloomgren@...
To: nvda@groups.io
Date sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:01:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
How does one implement Braille tables into NVDA which aren't currently present? There's a jerry-rigged way to do so with the *.JBT files within Jaws.
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Lee
To: nvda@groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:50
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
Ah yes.
I do plan to publish a third-party try build that'll include newer UEB tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this weekend..
Cheers,
Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Christopher-Mark Gilland <clgilland07@...>
Right, I get that, but is there a way one could modify that library to add new tables which aren't there already? --- Christopher Gilland JAWS Certified, 2016. Training Instructor. @AHeart4God316Phone: (704) 256-8010 Extension 401.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Lee" < @joslee> To: <nvda@groups.io> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Hi,
Braille tables in NVDA comes from LibLouis, the braille translation library used by NVDA.
Cheers,
Joseph
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben J. Bloomgren" <bbloomgren@...
To: nvda@groups.io
Date sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:01:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
How does one implement Braille tables into NVDA which aren't currently present? There's a jerry-rigged way to do so with the *.JBT files within Jaws.
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Lee
To: nvda@groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:50
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
Ah yes.
I do plan to publish a third-party try build that'll include newer UEB tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this weekend..
Cheers,
Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table, but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise. Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Hi,
The table set and the library are sort of interrelated. You can add new
tables without modifying the library, and the only way to add new table for
use by NVDA is modifying the source code.
Cheers,
Joseph
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: Christopher-Mark Gilland [mailto: @AHeart4God316] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 5:23 PM To: nvda@groups.io Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Right, I get that, but is there a way one could modify that library to add new tables which aren't there already? --- Christopher Gilland JAWS Certified, 2016. Training Instructor. @AHeart4God316Phone: (704) 256-8010 Extension 401. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Lee" < @joslee> To: <nvda@groups.io> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Hi,
Braille tables in NVDA comes from LibLouis, the braille translation
library used by NVDA.
Cheers,
Joseph
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben J. Bloomgren" <bbloomgren@...
To: nvda@groups.io
Date sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:01:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
How does one implement Braille tables into NVDA which aren't currently
present? There's a jerry-rigged way to do so with the *.JBT files within
Jaws.
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Lee
To: nvda@groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:50
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
Ah yes.
I do plan to publish a third-party try build that'll include newer UEB
tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this
weekend..
Cheers,
Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was
wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a
couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English
Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table,
but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet
about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated
March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The
italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of
the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold
and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I
know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's
in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each
other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly
states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks
ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the
content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille
Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise.
Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I
don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting
these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope
it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such
coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My
earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been
brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
Christopher-Mark Gilland <clgilland07@...>
Ewww, ouch! That's kind of what I suspected, but I just wanted to be sure. --- Christopher Gilland JAWS Certified, 2016. Training Instructor. @AHeart4God316Phone: (704) 256-8010 Extension 401.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Lee" < @joslee> To: <nvda@groups.io> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:39 PM Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA Hi,
The table set and the library are sort of interrelated. You can add new
tables without modifying the library, and the only way to add new table for
use by NVDA is modifying the source code.
Cheers,
Joseph
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland [mailto:@AHeart4God316]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 5:23 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Right, I get that, but is there a way one could modify that library to add
new tables which aren't there already?
---
Christopher Gilland
JAWS Certified, 2016.
Training Instructor.
@AHeart4God316
Phone: (704) 256-8010 Extension 401.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Lee" <@joslee>
To: <nvda@groups.io>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
Braille tables in NVDA comes from LibLouis, the braille translation
library used by NVDA.
Cheers,
Joseph
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben J. Bloomgren" <bbloomgren@...
To: nvda@groups.io
Date sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:01:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
How does one implement Braille tables into NVDA which aren't currently
present? There's a jerry-rigged way to do so with the *.JBT files within
Jaws.
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Lee
To: nvda@groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:50
Subject: Re: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
Ah yes.
I do plan to publish a third-party try build that'll include newer UEB
tables (as an experimental option), likely tomorrow or sometime this
weekend..
Cheers,
Joseph
From: Sharni-Lee Ward [mailto:sharni-lee.ward@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:49 PM
To: nvda@groups.io
Subject: [nvda] The UEB table used in NVDA
Hi,
In recent emails, I mentioned I had a Focus 40 Braille display and was
wondering about inconsistencies with the Braille output. I've noticed a
couple other things that didn't gel with my knowledge of Unified English
Braille. Joseph told me NVDA was using an outdated version of the table,
but since these things were present both when I first got the pamphlet
about UEB in School in 2005 and in an overview I found via Google dated
March 2013, I find myself a little confused.
1. Related to previously mentioned formatting inconsistencies. The
italic terminator is used after a single word thus emphasised instead of
the italic word indicator appearing before it. This is also true of bold
and likely other such formatting.
2. "E-a" is not contracted in the middle of words. Neither is "cc". I
know "dd" was removed but nothing was mentioned about "cc" and since it's
in the middle of the cell, it should have been just fine.
3. And, For, Of, The and With are still presented as being next to each
other with no spaces. This, as I recall and as the 2013 overview clearly
states, was changed in UEB.
This is coming from someone who only got her Braille Display two weeks
ago and who never looked at Braille-related emails before then due to the
content not being relevant before aforementioned acquisition of a Braille
Display, so if anything like this has been mentioned before, I apologise.
Also, if there have been any changes to the UEB code since 2013 that I
don't know about, I'd like a link.
I look forward to those working on the Braille side of things correcting
these problems, if indeed some of them are problems, and although I hope
it will be in the next update, I don't know the work that goes into such
coding. I just thought I'd point them out in case nobody had as yet. My
earlier point about emdashes and italicised passages has already been
brought to Joseph's attention, so I needn't go over that again. :D
|
|
|
