Two proposals: should list elect moderators, and should there be a subgroup devoted to list policies and administration?
Hi NVDA forum members,
Recent discussion on moderator selection procedure brought up two important issues:
* Policy discussion: Because this list is devoted to talking about NVDA, it was suggested that a subgroup for discussing policies and what not be created.
* For consistency, this list should decide whether future moderators should be elected or appointed.
To minimize traffic, please send in your answers (yes or no for each suggestion) to firstname.lastname@example.org by March 25, 2016 at 23:59 UTC. When you do respond, please respond using the following format:
· Subgroup proposal: yes or no.
· Moderator election: yes or no.
This is done so Nimer and I can tally the results easily.
The moderators are also receiving nominations for moderator position (so far, we have one).
Joseph and every one,
I as a member of this list appreciate being asked for my opinions / thoughts on issues concerning nvda and the list.
I think no one on this list would like being told how and what writing / behavior was to be exhibited.
Joseph, you have done well taking care of the needs of this list!
Sorry to see you step down.
On 3/22/2016 3:40 PM, Joseph Lee wrote: